Literature DB >> 21864223

Are there health effects of harassment in the workplace? A gender-sensitive study of the relationships between work and neck pain.

Susan R Stock1, France Tissot.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to identify workplace physical and psychosocial risk factors for neck pain among male and female workers and, in particular, to study the relationship between neck pain and intimidation and sexual harassment in the workplace in a representative sample of the Quebec working population. The study sample included 5405 men and 3987 women. In multiple logistic regression analyses, when taking into account individual and other workplace factors, neck pain was significantly associated with intimidation at work among both male (odds ratio (OR) 1.4 (1.01-1.8)) and female workers (OR 1.3 (1.01-1.8)). Among female workers, neck pain was alsosignificantly associated with unwanted sexual attention (OR 1.6 (1.1-2.4)). If confirmed in prospective studies, these results suggest that interventions to prevent harassment in the workplace may help reduce musculoskeletal disorders in the workplace and that workplace programmes to reduce harassment in the workplace should include prevention of sexual harassment. PRACTITIONER
SUMMARY: While taking into account relevant personal factors and previously identified workplace physical and psychosocial risk factors, this gender-based study identifies new work exposures associated with neck pain that have not previously been studied, including unwanted sexual attention, intimidation and difficult or tense situations with the public.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21864223     DOI: 10.1080/00140139.2011.598243

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ergonomics        ISSN: 0014-0139            Impact factor:   2.778


  7 in total

1.  Workplace psychosocial and organizational factors for neck pain in workers in the United States.

Authors:  Haiou Yang; Edward Hitchcock; Scott Haldeman; Naomi Swanson; Ming-Lun Lu; BongKyoo Choi; Akinori Nakata; Dean Baker
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  2016-05-17       Impact factor: 2.214

2.  Worker-to-Worker Violence in Hospitals: Perpetrator Characteristics and Common Dyads.

Authors:  Lydia E Hamblin; Lynnette Essenmacher; Joel Ager; Mark Upfal; Mark Luborsky; Jim Russell; Judith Arnetz
Journal:  Workplace Health Saf       Date:  2015-10-08       Impact factor: 1.413

3.  Application and implementation of the hazard risk matrix to identify hospital workplaces at risk for violence.

Authors:  Judith E Arnetz; Lydia Hamblin; Joel Ager; Deanna Aranyos; Mark J Upfal; Mark Luborsky; Jim Russell; Lynnette Essenmacher
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  2014-09-15       Impact factor: 2.214

4.  Associations of workplace bullying and harassment with pain.

Authors:  Jiro Takaki; Toshiyo Taniguchi; Kumi Hirokawa
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2013-09-25       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 5.  Sex and Gender Differences in Occupational Hazard Exposures: a Scoping Review of the Recent Literature.

Authors:  A Biswas; S Harbin; E Irvin; H Johnston; M Begum; M Tiong; D Apedaile; M Koehoorn; P Smith
Journal:  Curr Environ Health Rep       Date:  2021-11-27

6.  Risk of psychiatric and neurological diseases in patients with workplace mobbing experience in Germany: a retrospective database analysis.

Authors:  Karel Kostev; Juliana Rex; Lilia Waehlert; Daniela Hog; Christina Heilmaier
Journal:  Ger Med Sci       Date:  2014-05-27

7.  Prevention Strategies for Sexual Harassment in Academic Medicine: A Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Sabine C Jenner; Pia Djermester; Sabine Oertelt-Prigione
Journal:  J Interpers Violence       Date:  2020-01-30
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.