BACKGROUND: Volatile anesthetics have a dual effect on cell survival dependent on caveolin expression. The effect of volatile anesthetics on cancer cell survival and death after anesthetic exposure has not been well investigated. The authors examined the effects of isoflurane exposure on apoptosis and its regulation by caveolin-1 (Cav-1). METHODS: The authors exposed human colon cancer cell lines to isoflurane and proapoptotic stimuli and assessed what role Cav-1 plays in cell protection. They evaluated apoptosis using assays for nucleosomal fragmentation, cleaved caspase 3 expression, and caspase activity assays. To test the mechanism, they used pharmacologic inhibitors (i.e., pertussis toxin) and assessed changes in glycolysis. RESULTS: Apoptosis as measured by nucleosomal fragmentation was enhanced by isoflurane (1.2% in air) in HT29 (by 64% relative to control, P < 0.001) and decreased in HCT116 (by 23% relative to control, P < 0.001) cells. Knockdown of Cav-1 in HCT116 cells increased the sensitivity to apoptotic stimuli but not with scrambled small interfering RNA (siRNA) treatment (19.7 ± 0.4 vs. 20.0 ± 0.6, P = 0.7786 and 19.7 ± 0.5 vs. 16.3 ± 0.4, P = 0.0012, isoflurane vs. control in Cav-1 small interfering RNA vs. scrambled small interfering RNA treated cells, respectively). The protective effect of isoflurane with various exposure times on apoptosis was enhanced in HT29 cells overexpressing Cav-1 (P < 0.001 by two-way ANOVA). Pertussis toxin effectively blocked the antiapoptotic effect of isoflurane exhibited by Cav-1 in all cell lines. Cav-1 cells had increased glycolysis with isoflurane exposure; however, in the presence of tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand, this increase in glycolysis was maintained in HT29-Cav-1 but not control cells. CONCLUSION: Brief isoflurane exposure leads to resistance against apoptosis via a Cav-1-dependent mechanism.
BACKGROUND: Volatile anesthetics have a dual effect on cell survival dependent on caveolin expression. The effect of volatile anesthetics on cancer cell survival and death after anesthetic exposure has not been well investigated. The authors examined the effects of isoflurane exposure on apoptosis and its regulation by caveolin-1 (Cav-1). METHODS: The authors exposed humancolon cancer cell lines to isoflurane and proapoptotic stimuli and assessed what role Cav-1 plays in cell protection. They evaluated apoptosis using assays for nucleosomal fragmentation, cleaved caspase 3 expression, and caspase activity assays. To test the mechanism, they used pharmacologic inhibitors (i.e., pertussis toxin) and assessed changes in glycolysis. RESULTS: Apoptosis as measured by nucleosomal fragmentation was enhanced by isoflurane (1.2% in air) in HT29 (by 64% relative to control, P < 0.001) and decreased in HCT116 (by 23% relative to control, P < 0.001) cells. Knockdown of Cav-1 in HCT116 cells increased the sensitivity to apoptotic stimuli but not with scrambled small interfering RNA (siRNA) treatment (19.7 ± 0.4 vs. 20.0 ± 0.6, P = 0.7786 and 19.7 ± 0.5 vs. 16.3 ± 0.4, P = 0.0012, isoflurane vs. control in Cav-1 small interfering RNA vs. scrambled small interfering RNA treated cells, respectively). The protective effect of isoflurane with various exposure times on apoptosis was enhanced in HT29 cells overexpressing Cav-1 (P < 0.001 by two-way ANOVA). Pertussis toxin effectively blocked the antiapoptotic effect of isoflurane exhibited by Cav-1 in all cell lines. Cav-1 cells had increased glycolysis with isoflurane exposure; however, in the presence of tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand, this increase in glycolysis was maintained in HT29-Cav-1 but not control cells. CONCLUSION: Brief isoflurane exposure leads to resistance against apoptosis via a Cav-1-dependent mechanism.
Authors: D T Ross; U Scherf; M B Eisen; C M Perou; C Rees; P Spellman; V Iyer; S S Jeffrey; M Van de Rijn; M Waltham; A Pergamenschikov; J C Lee; D Lashkari; D Shalon; T G Myers; J N Weinstein; D Botstein; P O Brown Journal: Nat Genet Date: 2000-03 Impact factor: 38.330
Authors: Vesna Jevtovic-Todorovic; Richard E Hartman; Yukitoshi Izumi; Nicholas D Benshoff; Krikor Dikranian; Charles F Zorumski; John W Olney; David F Wozniak Journal: J Neurosci Date: 2003-02-01 Impact factor: 6.167
Authors: Franco Capozza; Terence M Williams; William Schubert; Steve McClain; Boumediene Bouzahzah; Federica Sotgia; Michael P Lisanti Journal: Am J Pathol Date: 2003-06 Impact factor: 4.307
Authors: Marija Tonkovic-Capin; Garrett J Gross; Zeljko J Bosnjak; James S Tweddell; Colleen M Fitzpatrick; John E Baker Journal: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol Date: 2002-07 Impact factor: 4.733
Authors: Sebastian Heinrich; Katrin Janitz; Susanne Merkel; Peter Klein; Joachim Schmidt Journal: Langenbecks Arch Surg Date: 2014-09-21 Impact factor: 3.445
Authors: Andrea Yap; Maria A Lopez-Olivo; Julia Dubowitz; Jonathan Hiller; Bernhard Riedel Journal: Can J Anaesth Date: 2019-03-04 Impact factor: 5.063