Literature DB >> 21862820

Automated ultrasound of the breast for diagnosis: interobserver agreement on lesion detection and characterization.

Hee Jung Shin1, Hak Hee Kim, Joo Hee Cha, Ju Hyun Park, Kyoung Eun Lee, Jeoung Hyun Kim.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to prospectively evaluate interobserver agreement on lesion detection and characterization in the review of automated ultrasound images of the breast by five radiologists. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: From August to October 2009, bilateral whole-breast ultrasound examinations were performed with an automated technique and with a handheld device for 55 women consecutively scheduled to undergo diagnostic ultrasound. Three-dimensional volume data from automated ultrasound were reviewed by five radiologists, who were unaware of the results of ultrasound with a handheld device and mammography and of the clinical information. If a lesion was detected with automated ultrasound, clock-face position, distance from the nipple, largest diameter, and BI-RADS final assessment category were evaluated. If the lesion was a mass, shape, orientation, margin, echogenicity, and posterior feature were analyzed. Intraclass correlation coefficients and kappa statistics were used for statistical analysis.
RESULTS: At least two observers identified 145 lesions with automated ultrasound. Among 725 possible detections, 587 (81%) detections were made. Individual investigators detected between 74% (107/145) and 88% (127/145) of the lesions. The rate of detection of lesions larger than 1.2 cm was 92%. Most lesions detected only with handheld ultrasound (11/12, 92%) or automated ultrasound (34/36, 94%) were cysts or probably benign masses. All intraclass correlation coefficients for lesion location and size exceeded 0.75, indicating high reliability. Substantial agreement was found for mass shape (κ = 0.71), orientation (κ = 0.72), margin (κ = 0.61), and BI-RADS final assessment category (κ = 0.63).
CONCLUSION: Detection of lesions larger than 1.2 cm in greatest diameter was reliable. High reliability was obtained for reporting lesion size and location. Substantial agreement was obtained for description of key feature and final assessment category.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21862820     DOI: 10.2214/AJR.10.5841

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  23 in total

Review 1.  Diagnostic performance of the automated breast volume scanner: a systematic review of inter-rater reliability/agreement and meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy for differentiating benign and malignant breast lesions.

Authors:  Zheying Meng; Cui Chen; Yitong Zhu; Shuling Zhang; Cong Wei; Bin Hu; Li Yu; Bing Hu; E Shen
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Three-dimensional shear-wave elastography for differentiating benign and malignant breast lesions: comparison with two-dimensional shear-wave elastography.

Authors:  Ji Hyun Youk; Hye Mi Gweon; Eun Ju Son; Jin Chung; Jeong-Ah Kim; Eun-Kyung Kim
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-12-02       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  The performance of 3D ABUS versus HHUS in the visualisation and BI-RADS characterisation of breast lesions in a large cohort of 1,886 women.

Authors:  Athina Vourtsis; Aspasia Kachulis
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-08-21       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 4.  Automated breast ultrasound: basic principles and emerging clinical applications.

Authors:  Martina Zanotel; Iliana Bednarova; Viviana Londero; Anna Linda; Michele Lorenzon; Rossano Girometti; Chiara Zuiani
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2017-08-28       Impact factor: 3.469

Review 5.  Ultrasound Imaging Technologies for Breast Cancer Detection and Management: A Review.

Authors:  Rongrong Guo; Guolan Lu; Binjie Qin; Baowei Fei
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2017-10-26       Impact factor: 2.998

Review 6.  Characterisation of breast papillary neoplasm on automated breast ultrasound.

Authors:  Q-L Zhu; J Zhang; X-J Lai; H-Y Wang; M-S Xiao; Y-X Jiang
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2013-07-05       Impact factor: 3.039

7.  The lesion detection efficacy of deep learning on automatic breast ultrasound and factors affecting its efficacy: a pilot study.

Authors:  Xiao Luo PhD; Min Xu; Guoxue Tang; Yi Wang PhD; Na Wang; Dong Ni PhD; Xi Lin PhD; An-Hua Li
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-12-15       Impact factor: 3.039

8.  Automated breast volume scanner (ABVS) in assessing breast cancer size: A comparison with conventional ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Rossano Girometti; Martina Zanotel; Viviana Londero; Anna Linda; Michele Lorenzon; Chiara Zuiani
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-10-10       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  3D Automated Breast Ultrasound System: Comparison of Interpretation Time of Senior Versus Junior Radiologist.

Authors:  Aydan Arslan; Gökhan Ertaş; Erkin Arıbal
Journal:  Eur J Breast Health       Date:  2019-07-01

10.  Diagnostic value of an automated breast volume scanner compared with a hand-held ultrasound: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xiaohui Zhang; Juan Chen; Yidong Zhou; Feng Mao; Yan Lin; Songjie Shen; Qiang Sun; Zhaolian Ouyang
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2019-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.