Literature DB >> 21862511

Macroporous bioceramics: a remarkable material for bone regeneration.

Kien-Seng Lew1, Radzali Othman, Kunio Ishikawa, Fei-Yee Yeoh.   

Abstract

This review summarises the major developments of macroporous bioceramics used mainly for repairing bone defects. Porous bioceramics have been receiving attention ever since their larger surface area was reported to be beneficial for the formation of more rigid bonds with host tissues. The study of porous bioceramics is important to overcome the less favourable bonds formed between dense bioceramics and host tissues, especially in healing bone defects. Macroporous bioceramics, which have been studied extensively, include hydroxyapatite, tricalcium phosphate, alumina, and zirconia. The pore size and interconnections both have significant effects on the growth rate of bone tissues. The optimum pore size of hydroxyapatite scaffolds for bone growth was found to be 300 µm. The existence of interconnections between pores is critical during the initial stage of tissue ingrowth on porous hydroxyapatite scaffolds. Furthermore, pore formation on β-tricalcium phosphate scaffolds also allowed the impregnation of growth factors and cells to improve bone tissues growth significantly. The formation of vascularised tissues was observed on macroporous alumina but did not take place in the case of dense alumina due to its bioinert nature. A macroporous alumina coating on scaffolds was able to improve the overall mechanical properties, and it enabled the impregnation of bioactive materials that could increase the bone growth rate. Despite the bioinertness of zirconia, porous zirconia was useful in designing scaffolds with superior mechanical properties after being coated with bioactive materials. The pores in zirconia were believed to improve the bone growth on the coated system. In summary, although the formation of pores in bioceramics may adversely affect mechanical properties, the advantages provided by the pores are crucial in repairing bone defects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21862511     DOI: 10.1177/0885328211406459

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomater Appl        ISSN: 0885-3282            Impact factor:   2.646


  7 in total

Review 1.  Calcium Orthophosphate-Based Bioceramics.

Authors:  Sergey V Dorozhkin
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2013-09-06       Impact factor: 3.623

2.  Enhancement of mechanical strength and in vivo cytocompatibility of porous β-tricalcium phosphate ceramics by gelatin coating.

Authors:  Toshitake Furusawa; Tsutomu Minatoya; Toshimitsu Okudera; Yasuo Sakai; Tomohiro Sato; Yuta Matsushima; Hidero Unuma
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2016-02-06

3.  Design and Production of Continuously Gradient Macro/Microporous Calcium Phosphate (CaP) Scaffolds Using Ceramic/Camphene-Based 3D Extrusion.

Authors:  Min-Kyung Ahn; Young-Wook Moon; Woo-Youl Maeng; Young-Hag Koh; Hyoun-Ee Kim
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 3.623

4.  Commentary: Bioceramics and Scaffolds: A Winning Combination for Tissue Engineering.

Authors:  Eric Denes; Guislaine Barrière; Evelyne Poli; Guillaume Lévêque
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2017-03-08

5.  Coextrusion-Based 3D Plotting of Ceramic Pastes for Porous Calcium Phosphate Scaffolds Comprised of Hollow Filaments.

Authors:  In-Hwan Jo; Young-Hag Koh; Hyoun-Ee Kim
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2018-05-29       Impact factor: 3.623

Review 6.  Recent advances in the local antibiotics delivery systems for management of osteomyelitis.

Authors:  Reem Khaled Wassif; Maha Elkayal; Rehab Nabil Shamma; Seham A Elkheshen
Journal:  Drug Deliv       Date:  2021-12       Impact factor: 6.819

7.  Effect of Porosity of Alumina and Zirconia Ceramics toward Pre-Osteoblast Response.

Authors:  Chrystalleni Hadjicharalambous; Oleg Prymak; Kateryna Loza; Ales Buyakov; Sergei Kulkov; Maria Chatzinikolaidou
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2015-10-28
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.