Literature DB >> 21862416

Kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty: trends in use in ambulatory and inpatient settings.

Vadim Goz1, Steven M Koehler, Natalia N Egorova, Alan J Moskowitz, Stephanie A Guillerme, Andrew C Hecht, Sheeraz A Qureshi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Vertebral compression fractures (VCFs) are a substantial health concern. Kyphoplasty (KP) and vertebroplasty (VP) are vertebral augmentation procedures (VAPs) used to treat VCFs.
PURPOSE: To compare VP and KP patient demographics and evaluate inpatient and outpatient utilization trends. STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of patient demographics, and inpatient and outpatient utilization trends, from California, New York, and Florida inpatient and ambulatory discharge databases.
METHODS: Hospitalizations for VP and KP were identified from California, New York, and Florida inpatient and ambulatory discharge databases from 2005 to 2008. International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision diagnosis codes for pathologic, dorsal, and lumbar fracture of vertebrae were cross-referenced with ICD-9 procedure codes and Current Procedural Terminology codes to select the population. Patients younger than 40 years or those who underwent both procedures were excluded.
RESULTS: The final population contained 61,851 VAPs (35,805 KPs and 26,046 VPs). Kyphoplasty showed increased inpatient and outpatient utilization. Vertebroplasty utilization remained at a low level of 6/100,000 capita. Kyphoplasty patients had more comorbidities than VP patients. In Florida in 2008, radiologists performed most VPs (52.3%) and orthopedists performed the most KPs (35.45%). Postoperative complication rates were significantly different; 0.79% of KPs had cardiac complications versus 0.57% of VPs (p=.0073). Respiratory complications occurred in 0.83% of KPs and 0.49% of VPs (p<.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: Vertebral augmentation procedures have seen a continued increase in use from 2004 to 2008. Use of KP significantly outpaces the use of VP. Reasons for the increasing utilization of KP likely include financial incentives, the specialty performing KP, perceived safety, and effectiveness of vertebral height restoration. Conflicting evidence regarding which procedure is safer warrants further evaluation.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21862416     DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2011.07.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine J        ISSN: 1529-9430            Impact factor:   4.166


  8 in total

1.  Vertebral compression fracture with intravertebral vacuum cleft sign: pathogenesis, image, and surgical intervention.

Authors:  Ai-Min Wu; Yong-Long Chi; Wen-Fei Ni
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2013-05-22

2.  Cost-effectiveness of a multifactorial fracture prevention program for elderly people admitted to nursing homes.

Authors:  Dirk Müller; Lisa Borsi; Claudia Stracke; Stephanie Stock; Björn Stollenwerk
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2014-05-13

3.  A randomized trial comparing balloon kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty for vertebral compression fractures due to osteoporosis.

Authors:  M Dohm; C M Black; A Dacre; J B Tillman; G Fueredi
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2014-10-09       Impact factor: 3.825

4.  Incidence and Risk Factors for Complications and Mortality After Vertebroplasty or Kyphoplasty in the Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fracture-Analysis of 1,932 Cases From the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement.

Authors:  Ho-Joong Kim; Scott L Zuckerman; Meghan Cerpa; Jin S Yeom; Ronald A Lehman; Lawrence G Lenke
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2020-12-30

5.  Spine surgeon specialty differences in single-level percutaneous kyphoplasty.

Authors:  Kejia Hu; Motao Liu; Amy J Wang; Gexin Zhao; Yuhao Sun; Chaoqun Yang; Yiwang Zhang; Matthew M Hutter; Dehong Feng; Bomin Sun; Ziv Williams
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2019-11-06       Impact factor: 2.102

6.  Cement Augmentation of Vertebral Compression Fractures May Be Safely Considered in the Very Elderly.

Authors:  Anoop R Galivanche; Courtney Toombs; Murillo Adrados; Wyatt B David; Rohil Malpani; Comron Saifi; Peter G Whang; Jonathan N Grauer; Arya G Varthi
Journal:  Neurospine       Date:  2021-03-31

7.  Why does patients' discharge delay after vertebral augmentation? A factor analysis of 1,442 patients.

Authors:  He Zhao; Zhengping Zhang; Yanjun Wang; Bing Qian; Xinhao Cao; Ming Yang; Yangjin Liu; Qinpeng Zhao
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-09-23

8.  Cost-effectiveness of strontium ranelate in the treatment of male osteoporosis.

Authors:  M Hiligsmann; W Ben Sedrine; O Bruyère; J-Y Reginster
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2013-02-01       Impact factor: 4.507

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.