Literature DB >> 21862132

Willingness to pay for improvements in chronic long-acting insulin therapy in individuals with type 1 or type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Andrew Lloyd1, Beenish Nafees, Anthony H Barnett, Simon Heller, Uffe J Ploug, Morten Lammert, Mette Bøgelund.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Long-acting insulin treatments with varying clinical benefits are currently available for patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). The current evidence base demonstrates the efficacy of treatments, but it is critical also to understand patient preferences regarding treatments and how they are determined.
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to measure the willingness to pay (WTP) of individuals with diabetes in the United Kingdom for different attributes of long-acting insulin therapy.
METHODS: A survey based on discrete choice experiment methodology was developed to elicit the preferences and values of adults with T1DM or insulin-dependent T2DM regarding different aspects of their therapy. Participants were presented with a series of 27 paired choices and asked which they preferred. WTP values were calculated for relevant attribute levels.
RESULTS: A total of 252 participants completed the questionnaire (52% response rate); 143 had T1DM and 109 had insulin-treated T2DM. The highest WTP values in participants with T1DM were avoiding 2-kg or 4-kg weight gain (£29 and £58, respectively), avoiding major difficulties with the injection device (£49), increasing the number of days per week when blood glucose levels are in the target range from 2 to 6 (£40), reducing the number of daily injections from 3 to 1 (£39), and avoiding nighttime hypoglycemia (£33). In participants with T2DM, similar factors had the highest WTP.
CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to assess WTP for long-acting insulin therapy and could have implications for future guidelines on diabetes management, however some limitations, notably in sample selection, could affect generalizability of the results. In both T1DM and T2DM, the highest WTP values were for avoidance of weight gain, and reduction in the number of injections and hypoglycemia.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier HS Journals, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21862132     DOI: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2011.07.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Ther        ISSN: 0149-2918            Impact factor:   3.393


  17 in total

Review 1.  A descriptive review on methods to prioritize outcomes in a health care context.

Authors:  Inger M Janssen; Ansgar Gerhardus; Milly A Schröer-Günther; Fülöp Scheibler
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2014-08-25       Impact factor: 3.377

Review 2.  Incorporating process utility into quality adjusted life years: a systematic review of empirical studies.

Authors:  Victoria K Brennan; Simon Dixon
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  Discrete Choice Experiment Attribute Selection Using a Multinational Interview Study: Treatment Features Important to Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.

Authors:  Anna Rydén; Stephanie Chen; Emuella Flood; Beverly Romero; Susan Grandy
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 3.883

4.  Cost-effectiveness of reducing glycaemic episodes through community pharmacy management of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Delia Hendrie; Ted R Miller; Richard J Woodman; Kreshnik Hoti; Jeff Hughes
Journal:  J Prim Prev       Date:  2014-12

5.  A Framework for Instrument Development of a Choice Experiment: An Application to Type 2 Diabetes.

Authors:  Ellen M Janssen; Jodi B Segal; John F P Bridges
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 3.883

Review 6.  Discrete choice experiments in health economics: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Michael D Clark; Domino Determann; Stavros Petrou; Domenico Moro; Esther W de Bekker-Grob
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 7.  Patient preferences for the treatment of type 2 diabetes: a scoping review.

Authors:  Susan M Joy; Emily Little; Nisa M Maruthur; Tanjala S Purnell; John F P Bridges
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 8.  The patient perspective of diabetes care: a systematic review of stated preference research.

Authors:  Lill-Brith von Arx; Trine Kjeer
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 3.883

9.  Patients' with type 2 diabetes willingness to pay for insulin therapy and clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Michael D Feher; John Brazier; Nicolaas Schaper; Gabriela Vega-Hernandez; Annie Nikolajsen; Mette Bøgelund
Journal:  BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care       Date:  2016-04-29

Review 10.  Patient and physician preferences for type 2 diabetes medications: a systematic review.

Authors:  Mahdi Toroski; Abbas Kebriaeezadeh; Alireza Esteghamati; Ali Kazemi Karyani; Hadi Abbasian; Shekoufeh Nikfar
Journal:  J Diabetes Metab Disord       Date:  2019-11-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.