Literature DB >> 21861672

Prostate-specific antigen testing across the spectrum of prostate cancer.

Mark R Haythorn1, Richard J Ablin.   

Abstract

Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) is a protein produced by the prostate, and this protein may be elevated for several reasons, including prostatitis, benign prostatic hypertrophy and/or cancer. PSA is not cancer-specific, cannot be used as a cancer marker and it has been demonstrated that there is no level of PSA that is definitive for prostate cancer. The value of the PSA test varies when used for screening, diagnosis, prognosis or as a signal of disease recurrence. Misuse of the test for screening has created unnecessary anxiety and costs, and has led to the significant overdiagnosis and overtreatment of men. More important than whether or not to screen is how one acts upon the data from a single test; with the exception of extremely high double- or triple-digit levels of PSA, it is prudent only to use a single PSA determination as a baseline, with biopsy and cancer treatment reserved for those with significant PSA changes over time, or for those with clinical manifestations mandating immediate therapy. Using the PSA test to monitor disease progression or recurrence is appropriate, provided one understands that absolute levels of PSA are rarely meaningful; it is the relative change in PSA levels over time that provides insight, but not definitive proof of a cancerous condition necessitating therapy. PSA secretion is under hormonal control and thus PSA levels may be affected differently by the type of drug therapy, by the stage of a patients' disease, and by genetic factors suggesting some men are 'high PSA producers'. Until a validated alternative test for prostate cancer is found and adopted, the current flawed PSA test needs to be used more judiciously and not used for routine screening as studies have demonstrated that screening, as defined, does not lead to a reduction in patient mortality. All men, their families and their physicians need to understand the significant limitations of PSA testing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21861672     DOI: 10.2217/bmm.11.53

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomark Med        ISSN: 1752-0363            Impact factor:   2.851


  11 in total

1.  Age-Specific Reference Ranges of Prostate-Specific Antigen among Saudi Men as a Representation of the Arab Population.

Authors:  Danny Munther Rabah; Karim Hamda Farhat; Mohamed Abdullah Al-Atawi; Mostafa Ahmed Arafa
Journal:  Med Princ Pract       Date:  2019-02-07       Impact factor: 1.927

2.  Mean Platelet Volume-A Predictive Factor for the Diagnosis of Nonsymptomatic Prostatitis: Results of Univariate and Multivariate Models.

Authors:  Murat Mehmet Rifaioglu; Onur Demirbas; Hasan Gokce; Mursel Davarci
Journal:  Am J Mens Health       Date:  2016-07-08

Review 3.  Potential of nuclear magnetic resonance metabolomics in the study of prostate cancer.

Authors:  R Ravikanth Reddy; Naranamangalam R Jagannathan
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2022-04-01

4.  Prediction of Prostate Cancer Disease Aggressiveness Using Bi-Parametric Mri Radiomics.

Authors:  Ana Rodrigues; João Santinha; Bernardo Galvão; Celso Matos; Francisco M Couto; Nickolas Papanikolaou
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 6.639

5.  The risks of information in health care: do we need a new decision aid?

Authors:  Franz Porzsolt; Tania Gouvêa Thomaz; Thiago Inocêncio Constâncio; Aluisio Gomes da Silva-Júnior; Antonio Claudio Lucas da Nóbrega
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 2.365

Review 6.  Current status of biomarkers for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Vicki M Velonas; Henry H Woo; Cristobal G dos Remedios; Stephen J Assinder
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2013-05-24       Impact factor: 5.923

7.  Evaluation and characterization of anti-RalA autoantibody as a potential serum biomarker in human prostate cancer.

Authors:  Jitian Li; Liping Dai; Ningjing Lei; Mengtao Xing; Pei Li; Chenglin Luo; Carlos A Casiano; Jian-Ying Zhang
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-07-12

Review 8.  RNAs as Candidate Diagnostic and Prognostic Markers of Prostate Cancer-From Cell Line Models to Liquid Biopsies.

Authors:  Marvin C J Lim; Anne-Marie Baird; John Aird; John Greene; Dhruv Kapoor; Steven G Gray; Ray McDermott; Stephen P Finn
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2018-08-30

9.  Predicting clinically significant prostate cancer using DCE-MRI habitat descriptors.

Authors:  N Andres Parra; Hong Lu; Qian Li; Radka Stoyanova; Alan Pollack; Sanoj Punnen; Jung Choi; Mahmoud Abdalah; Christopher Lopez; Kenneth Gage; Jong Y Park; Yamoah Kosj; Julio M Pow-Sang; Robert J Gillies; Yoganand Balagurunathan
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2018-12-14

10.  Lipocalin-2 (LCN2) Deficiency Leads to Cellular Changes in Highly Metastatic Human Prostate Cancer Cell Line PC-3.

Authors:  Sarah K Schröder; Manuela Pinoé-Schmidt; Ralf Weiskirchen
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2022-01-13       Impact factor: 6.600

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.