Literature DB >> 21861629

Pro- and antisaccades: dissociating stimulus and response influences the online control of saccade trajectories.

Jeffrey Weiler1, Scott A Holmes, Ali Mulla, Matthew Heath.   

Abstract

The authors examined whether the diminished online control of antisaccades is related to a trade-off between movement planning and control or the remapping of target properties to a mirror-symmetrical location (i.e., vector inversion). Pro- and antisaccades were examined in a standard no-delay schedule wherein target onset served as the movement imperative and a delay cuing schedule wherein responses were initiated 2,000 ms following target onset. Importantly, the delay cuing schedule was employed to equate pro- and antisaccade reaction times. Online control was evaluated by indexing the strength of trajectory amendments at normalized increments of movement time. Antisaccades exhibited fewer online corrections than prosaccades, and this result was consistent across cuing schedules. Thus, the diminished online control of antisaccades cannot be tied to a trade-off between movement planning and control. Rather, the authors propose that the intentional nature of dissociating stimulus and response (i.e., vector inversion) engenders a slow mode of cognitive control that is not optimized for fast oculomotor corrections.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21861629     DOI: 10.1080/00222895.2011.604656

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mot Behav        ISSN: 0022-2895            Impact factor:   1.328


  4 in total

1.  Alternating between pro- and antisaccades: switch-costs manifest via decoupling the spatial relations between stimulus and response.

Authors:  Matthew Heath; Caitlin Gillen; Ashna Samani
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-12-12       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Stimulus-driven saccades are characterized by an invariant undershooting bias: no evidence for a range effect.

Authors:  Caitlin Gillen; Jeffrey Weiler; Matthew Heath
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-07-25       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  The prior-antisaccade effect influences the planning and online control of prosaccades.

Authors:  Jeffrey Weiler; Matthew Heath
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-11-27       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Error correcting mechanisms during antisaccades: contribution of online control during primary saccades and offline control via secondary saccades.

Authors:  Harleen Bedi; Herbert C Goltz; Agnes M F Wong; Manokaraananthan Chandrakumar; Ewa Niechwiej-Szwedo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-06       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.