Blanca Molins1, Esther Peña, Raquel de la Torre, Lina Badimon. 1. Cardiovascular Research Center, CSIC-ICCC, Institut Investigacions Biomèdiques Sant Pau, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, C/ Sant Antoni Mª Claret 167, 08025 Barcelona, Spain.
Abstract
AIMS: We previously reported that C-reactive protein bioactivity on thrombogenesis was based on loss of its pentameric symmetry, resulting in formation of monomeric C-reactive protein. Our purpose was to provide mechanistic information on the direct effects of C-reactive protein isoforms on platelet activation and provide a C-reactive protein dissociation mechanism in circulating blood. METHODS AND RESULTS: C-reactive protein-induced platelet activation was evaluated by flow cytometry. Platelet aggregation, clot properties, and coagulation were also measured. Washed platelets were incubated with C-reactive protein isoforms and vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein (VASP) phosphorylation was analysed by western blot and immunofluorescence. C-reactive protein dissociation under flow was evaluated by confocal microscopy on the surface of adhered platelets after perfusing human blood containing pentameric C-reactive protein at different shear rates. Dissociated monomeric C-reactive protein thrombogenicity was measured in flow experiments. Platelet aggregation and flow cytometry analysis revealed that monomeric C-reactive protein significantly induced platelet aggregation, surface P-selectin and CD63 exposure, and glycoprotein IIb-IIIa activation, whereas pentameric C-reactive protein was unable to produce any effect. p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) and Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) inhibitors, as well as CD36 blocking antibody partially inhibited monomeric C-reactive protein-induced platelet activation and aggregation. Additionally, monomeric C-reactive protein significantly induced VASP dephosphorylation at serine 239. We found that pentameric C-reactive protein dissociated into monomeric C-reactive protein on the surface of activated adhered platelets under flow conditions and that this generated monomeric C-reactive protein promoted further platelet recruitment. CONCLUSIONS: These data indicate that whereas serum pentameric C-reactive protein may not affect platelet activation, monomeric C-reactive protein, which dissociates from pentameric C-reactive protein on the surface of activated platelets, could contribute to atherothrombotic complications by promoting thrombosis.
AIMS: We previously reported that C-reactive protein bioactivity on thrombogenesis was based on loss of its pentameric symmetry, resulting in formation of monomeric C-reactive protein. Our purpose was to provide mechanistic information on the direct effects of C-reactive protein isoforms on platelet activation and provide a C-reactive protein dissociation mechanism in circulating blood. METHODS AND RESULTS:C-reactive protein-induced platelet activation was evaluated by flow cytometry. Platelet aggregation, clot properties, and coagulation were also measured. Washed platelets were incubated with C-reactive protein isoforms and vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein (VASP) phosphorylation was analysed by western blot and immunofluorescence. C-reactive protein dissociation under flow was evaluated by confocal microscopy on the surface of adhered platelets after perfusing human blood containing pentameric C-reactive protein at different shear rates. Dissociated monomeric C-reactive protein thrombogenicity was measured in flow experiments. Platelet aggregation and flow cytometry analysis revealed that monomeric C-reactive protein significantly induced platelet aggregation, surface P-selectin and CD63 exposure, and glycoprotein IIb-IIIa activation, whereas pentameric C-reactive protein was unable to produce any effect. p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) and Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) inhibitors, as well as CD36 blocking antibody partially inhibited monomeric C-reactive protein-induced platelet activation and aggregation. Additionally, monomeric C-reactive protein significantly induced VASP dephosphorylation at serine 239. We found that pentameric C-reactive protein dissociated into monomeric C-reactive protein on the surface of activated adhered platelets under flow conditions and that this generated monomeric C-reactive protein promoted further platelet recruitment. CONCLUSIONS: These data indicate that whereas serum pentameric C-reactive protein may not affect platelet activation, monomeric C-reactive protein, which dissociates from pentameric C-reactive protein on the surface of activated platelets, could contribute to atherothrombotic complications by promoting thrombosis.
Authors: Vivian K Kawai; Ingrid Avalos; Annette Oeser; John A Oates; Ginger L Milne; Joseph F Solus; Cecilia P Chung; C Michael Stein Journal: Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) Date: 2014-02 Impact factor: 4.794
Authors: Hai-Yun Li; Jing Wang; Yue-Xin Wu; Lin Zhang; Zu-Pei Liu; János G Filep; Lawrence A Potempa; Yi Wu; Shang-Rong Ji Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2014-04-07 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Kathleen R Chirco; S Scott Whitmore; Kai Wang; Lawrence A Potempa; Jennifer A Halder; Edwin M Stone; Budd A Tucker; Robert F Mullins Journal: J Pathol Date: 2016-09-19 Impact factor: 7.996