Literature DB >> 21859505

A cost-effectiveness study of the community-based intervention '10 000 Steps Ghent'.

Delphine De Smedt1, Katrien De Cocker, Lieven Annemans, Ilse De Bourdeaudhuij, Greet Cardon.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of the European community-based project '10 000 Steps Ghent', an intervention that resulted in a significant decrease in sedentary time and a significant increase in step counts (896 steps/d) and self-reported walking (66 min/week).
DESIGN: An age- and gender-dependent Markov model, with a time horizon of 20 years and a cycle length of 1 year, estimating the development of diabetes, cardiovascular events and colorectal cancer.
SETTING: All individuals started in a health state free of events. The effect of the intervention was based on published risk reductions related to increased walking time. Costs and utility decrements related to events were obtained from published literature. The impact of the uncertainty of the parameters on incremental costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALY) were assessed with one-way sensitivity analyses and a Monte Carlo analysis.
SUBJECTS: Cohort representing the population reached by the intervention (266 adults aged 25-75 years with a mean age of 48·2 (sd 13·1) years, 45·6 % men, 64·6 % highly educated, 70·0 % employed).
RESULTS: Implementing the community-based programme increased average QALY by 0·16 and 0·11 for men and women, respectively. The total costs decreased by approximately 576€ and 427€, respectively. Hence, for both genders the intervention programme was dominant. The sensitivity analyses did not change the conclusion of dominance.
CONCLUSION: The community-based '10 000 Steps Ghent' campaign is a dominant intervention. Sensitivity analyses have proved the robustness of the results; hence implementing this intervention on a population-based level could lead to improved health outcomes and reduced costs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21859505     DOI: 10.1017/S1368980011001716

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Public Health Nutr        ISSN: 1368-9800            Impact factor:   4.022


  6 in total

1.  Gastric bypass is a cost-saving procedure: results from a comprehensive Markov model.

Authors:  Gil R Faria; John R Preto; José Costa-Maia
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 4.129

2.  Cost-effectiveness of health promotion targeting physical activity and healthy eating in mental health care.

Authors:  Nick Verhaeghe; Delphine De Smedt; Jan De Maeseneer; Lea Maes; Cornelis Van Heeringen; Lieven Annemans
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2014-08-18       Impact factor: 3.295

3.  The cost-effectiveness of interventions targeting lifestyle change for the prevention of diabetes in a Swedish primary care and community based prevention program.

Authors:  Anne Neumann; Lars Lindholm; Margareta Norberg; Olaf Schoffer; Stefanie J Klug; Fredrik Norström
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2016-12-02

Review 4.  Economic evaluation of physical activity mass media campaigns across the globe: a systematic review.

Authors:  Marina B Pinheiro; Kirsten Howard; Cathie Sherrington; Adrian Bauman; Nathalia Costa; Ben J Smith; William Bellew; Ding Ding; Anne Tiedemann; Belinda Wang; Andreia C Santos; Fiona Bull; Juana Willumsen; Bruna S Albuquerque; Frances Rom Lunar; Vishwesh Bapat; Sarah K Norris
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2022-08-26       Impact factor: 8.915

5.  Cost-effectiveness of counseling and pedometer use to increase physical activity in the Netherlands: a modeling study.

Authors:  Eelco Ab Over; Gc Wanda Wendel-Vos; Matthijs van den Berg; Heleen H Hamberg-van Reenen; Luqman Tariq; Rudolf T Hoogenveen; Pieter Hm van Baal
Journal:  Cost Eff Resour Alloc       Date:  2012-09-24

6.  Short-term and long-term cost-effectiveness of a pedometer-based exercise intervention in primary care: a within-trial analysis and beyond-trial modelling.

Authors:  Nana Anokye; Julia Fox-Rushby; Sabina Sanghera; Derek G Cook; Elizabeth Limb; Cheryl Furness; Sally Margaret Kerry; Christina R Victor; Steve Iliffe; Michael Ussher; Peter H Whincup; Ulf Ekelund; Stephen deWilde; Tess Harris
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-10-17       Impact factor: 2.692

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.