Literature DB >> 2185930

Prediction of rebleeding in peptic ulcers by visual stigmata and endoscopic Doppler ultrasound criteria.

G M Fullarton1, W R Murray.   

Abstract

Following peptic ulcer hemorrhage, the ability to accurately determine those patients at highest risk of rebleeding relies on clinical and endoscopic criteria which are accurate in only a variable proportion of cases. In this study we have assessed prediction of rebleeding in peptic ulcers using a transendoscopic vascular detector (TVD) to compare the presence of a positive Doppler signal in relation to an ulcer base with visual stigmata of recent hemorrhage (SRH). Of 711 patients endoscoped for upper GI hemorrhage over an 18-month period 180 (25%) were found to have a peptic ulcer. One hundred and twenty-four had either minor or no SRH at the time of endoscopy, and none of these patients rebled. Fifty-six patients had a single peptic ulcer with either active hemorrhage, a visible vessel or adherent clot, and 22 were entered into the trial. Overall, 9 patients (41%) in this group rebled. Considering prediction of rebleeding, visible vessels had a sensitivity of 89% and specificity of 92% compared with a positive Doppler signal sensitivity of 87% and specificity of 86%. These results suggest that the TVD can predict rebleeding in peptic ulcers with an accuracy similar to that of endoscopic identification of a visible vessel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2185930     DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-1012795

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Endoscopy        ISSN: 0013-726X            Impact factor:   10.093


  8 in total

1.  Endoscopic intervention in bleeding peptic ulcer.

Authors:  K R Palmer; C P Choudari
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 23.059

2.  Clinical courses and predictors for rebleeding in patients with peptic ulcers and non-bleeding visible vessels: a prospective study.

Authors:  H J Lin; C L Perng; F Y Lee; C H Lee; S D Lee
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 23.059

3.  Doppler Endoscopic Probe Monitoring of Blood Flow Improves Risk Stratification and Outcomes of Patients With Severe Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage.

Authors:  Dennis M Jensen; Thomas O G Kovacs; Gordon V Ohning; Kevin Ghassemi; Gustavo A Machicado; Gareth S Dulai; Alireza Sedarat; Rome Jutabha; Jeffrey Gornbein
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2017-02-04       Impact factor: 22.682

4.  Acute ulcer bleeding. A prospective randomized trial to compare Doppler and Forrest classifications in endoscopic diagnosis and therapy.

Authors:  B Kohler; M Maier; C Benz; J F Riemann
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 5.  A practical guide to the management of bleeding ulcers.

Authors:  C Villanueva; J Balanzó
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 9.546

6.  Endoscopic Doppler ultrasound versus endoscopic stigmata-directed management of acute peptic ulcer hemorrhage: a multimodel cost analysis.

Authors:  Victor K Chen; Richard C K Wong
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2006-11-16       Impact factor: 3.487

Review 7.  Recent advances in the management of peptic ulcer bleeding.

Authors:  Ian Beales
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2017-09-27

Review 8.  Hemostasis Techniques for Non-variceal Upper GI Hemorrhage: Beyond Injection and Cautery.

Authors:  B Nulsen; D M Jensen
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 3.487

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.