Literature DB >> 21859001

A fast three-dimensional gamma evaluation using a GPU utilizing texture memory for on-the-fly interpolations.

Lucas C G G Persoon1, Mark Podesta, Wouter J C van Elmpt, Sebastiaan M J J G Nijsten, Frank Verhaegen.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: A widely accepted method to quantify differences in dose distributions is the gamma (gamma) evaluation. Currently, almost all gamma implementations utilize the central processing unit (CPU). Recently, the graphics processing unit (GPU) has become a powerful platform for specific computing tasks. In this study, we describe the implementation of a 3D gamma evaluation using a GPU to improve calculation time.
METHODS: The gamma evaluation algorithm was implemented on an NVIDIA Tesla C2050 GPU using the compute unified device architecture (CUDA). First, several cubic virtual phantoms were simulated. These phantoms were tested with varying dose cube sizes and set-ups, introducing artificial dose differences. Second, to show applicability in clinical practice, five patient cases have been evaluated using the 3D dose distribution from a treatment planning system as the reference and the delivered dose determined during treatment as the comparison. A calculation time comparison between the CPU and GPU was made with varying thread-block sizes including the option of using texture or global memory.
RESULTS: A GPU over CPU speed-up of 66 +/- 12 was achieved for the virtual phantoms. For the patient cases, a speed-up of 57 +/- 15 using the GPU was obtained. A thread-block size of 16 x 16 performed best in all cases. The use of texture memory improved the total calculation time, especially when interpolation was applied. Differences between the CPU and GPU gammas were negligible.
CONCLUSIONS: The GPU and its features, such as texture memory, decreased the calculation time for gamma evaluations considerably without loss of accuracy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21859001     DOI: 10.1118/1.3595114

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  6 in total

1.  Optical cone beam tomography of Cherenkov-mediated signals for fast 3D dosimetry of x-ray photon beams in water.

Authors:  Adam K Glaser; Jacqueline M Andreozzi; Rongxiao Zhang; Brian W Pogue; David J Gladstone
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Comparison of 2D and 3D gamma analyses.

Authors:  Kiley B Pulliam; Jessie Y Huang; Rebecca M Howell; David Followill; Ryan Bosca; Jennifer O'Daniel; Stephen F Kry
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 3.  GPU-based high-performance computing for radiation therapy.

Authors:  Xun Jia; Peter Ziegenhein; Steve B Jiang
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2014-02-03       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Three-dimensional gamma criterion for patient-specific quality assurance of spot scanning proton beams.

Authors:  Chang Chang; Kendra L Poole; Anthony V Teran; Scott Luckman; Dennis Mah
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2015-09-08       Impact factor: 2.102

5.  Correlation analysis between 2D and quasi-3D gamma evaluations for both intensity-modulated radiation therapy and volumetric modulated arc therapy.

Authors:  Jung-In Kim; Chang Heon Choi; Hong-Gyun Wu; Jin Ho Kim; Kyubo Kim; Jong Min Park
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-01-17

6.  Practical application of Octavius® -4D: Characteristics and criticalities for IMRT and VMAT verification.

Authors:  Patrizia Urso; Rita Lorusso; Luca Marzoli; Daniela Corletto; Paolo Imperiale; Annalisa Pepe; Lorenzo Bianchi
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2018-07-16       Impact factor: 2.102

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.