Literature DB >> 21858885

Standardized approach for imaging and measuring Cesarean section scars using ultrasonography.

O Naji1, Y Abdallah, A J Bij De Vaate, A Smith, A Pexsters, C Stalder, A McIndoe, S Ghaem-Maghami, C Lees, H A M Brölmann, J A F Huirne, D Timmerman, T Bourne.   

Abstract

Incomplete healing of the scar is a recognized sequel of Cesarean section (CS) and may be associated with complications in later pregnancies. These complications can include scar pregnancy, a morbidly adherent placenta, scar dehiscence or rupture. To date there is uncertainty relating to the factors that lead to poor scar healing and how to recognize it. In recent years, there has been an increase in studies using ultrasound that describe scars as deficient, or poorly, incompletely or inadequately healed with few data to associate the morphology of the scar with the functional integrity of the lower segment of the uterus. There have been multiple attempts to describe CS scars using ultrasonography. Different terminology, methods and results have been reported, yet there is still no consensus regarding the prevalence, clinical significance or most appropriate method to describe the appearances of these scars. Developing a test that can predict the likelihood of women having problems associated with a CS scar is becoming increasingly important. On the other hand, understanding whether the ultrasound appearances of the scar can tell us anything about its integrity is not well supported by the research evidence. In this article we present an overview of ultrasound-based definitions and methods used to describe CS scars. We also present information relating to the performance of alternative techniques used to evaluate CS scars. Having examined the current evidence we suggest a standardized approach to describe CS scars using ultrasound so that future studies can be meaningfully compared.
Copyright © 2012 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 21858885     DOI: 10.1002/uog.10077

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0960-7692            Impact factor:   7.299


  24 in total

Review 1.  Post-caesarean Niche (Isthmocele) in Uterine Scar: An Update.

Authors:  Vidushi Kulshrestha; Nutan Agarwal; Garima Kachhawa
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2020-09-21

2.  Complications of Caesarean delivery part 1: Early complications.

Authors:  Eelin Tan; Timothy Shao Ern Tan; Harvey Eu Leong Teo; Li Ching Lau
Journal:  Ultrasound       Date:  2021-08-27

3.  Changes in uterine flexion caused by cesarean section: correlation between post-flexion and deficient cesarean section scars.

Authors:  Eiji Ryo; Rina Sakurai; Hideo Kamata; Michiharu Seto; Masayoshi Morita; Takuya Ayabe
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 1.314

4.  Laparoscopic management of a full-thickness uterine niche with subsequent pregnancy outcome.

Authors:  D Z Kasapoglu; L Y O Tang; R A Kadir; F Shakir
Journal:  Facts Views Vis Obgyn       Date:  2021-12

5.  Prediction of uterine dehiscence using ultrasonographic parameters of cesarean section scar in the nonpregnant uterus: a prospective observational study.

Authors:  Michal Pomorski; Tomasz Fuchs; Mariusz Zimmer
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2014-10-29       Impact factor: 3.007

6.  Misoprostol for miscarriage management in a woman with previous five cesarean deliveries: a case report and literature review.

Authors:  Doua AlSaad; Sawsan Alobaidly; Palli Abdulrouf; Binny Thomas; Afif Ahmed; Moza AlHail
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2017-05-09       Impact factor: 2.423

7.  Hysteroscopic resection of a uterine caesarean scar defect (niche) in women with postmenstrual spotting: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Ajmw Vervoort; L F van der Voet; Wjk Hehenkamp; A L Thurkow; Pjm van Kesteren; H Quartero; W Kuchenbecker; M Bongers; P Geomini; Lhm de Vleeschouwer; Mha van Hooff; H van Vliet; S Veersema; W B Renes; K Oude Rengerink; S E Zwolsman; Ham Brölmann; Bwj Mol; Jaf Huirne
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2017-07-05       Impact factor: 6.531

8.  Why do niches develop in Caesarean uterine scars? Hypotheses on the aetiology of niche development.

Authors:  A J M W Vervoort; L B Uittenbogaard; W J K Hehenkamp; H A M Brölmann; B W J Mol; J A F Huirne
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2015-09-25       Impact factor: 6.918

9.  The HysNiche trial: hysteroscopic resection of uterine caesarean scar defect (niche) in patients with abnormal bleeding, a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  A J M W Vervoort; L F Van der Voet; M Witmer; A L Thurkow; C M Radder; P J M van Kesteren; H W P Quartero; W K H Kuchenbecker; M Y Bongers; P M A J Geomini; L H M de Vleeschouwer; M H A van Hooff; H A A M van Vliet; S Veersema; W B Renes; H S van Meurs; J Bosmans; K Oude Rengerink; H A M Brölmann; B W J Mol; J A F Huirne
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2015-11-12       Impact factor: 2.809

Review 10.  Etiology of Cesarean Uterine Scar Defect (Niche): Detailed Critical Analysis of Hypotheses and Prevention Strategies and Peritoneal Closure Debate.

Authors:  Shashikant L Sholapurkar
Journal:  J Clin Med Res       Date:  2018-01-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.