Literature DB >> 21858733

Twice random, once mixed: applying mixed models to simultaneously analyze random effects of language and participants.

Dirk P Janssen1.   

Abstract

Psychologists, psycholinguists, and other researchers using language stimuli have been struggling for more than 30 years with the problem of how to analyze experimental data that contain two crossed random effects (items and participants). The classical analysis of variance does not apply; alternatives have been proposed but have failed to catch on, and a statistically unsatisfactory procedure of using two approximations (known as F(1) and F(2)) has become the standard. A simple and elegant solution using mixed model analysis has been available for 15 years, and recent improvements in statistical software have made mixed models analysis widely available. The aim of this article is to increase the use of mixed models by giving a concise practical introduction and by giving clear directions for undertaking the analysis in the most popular statistical packages. The article also introduces the DJMIXED: add-on package for SPSS, which makes entering the models and reporting their results as straightforward as possible.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 21858733     DOI: 10.3758/s13428-011-0145-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Res Methods        ISSN: 1554-351X


  15 in total

1.  The Picture-Word Interference Paradigm: Grammatical Class Effects in Lexical Production.

Authors:  Flavia De Simone; Simona Collina
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2016-10

2.  Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal.

Authors:  Dale J Barr; Roger Levy; Christoph Scheepers; Harry J Tily
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 3.059

3.  The function of regressions in reading: backward eye movements allow rereading.

Authors:  Robert W Booth; Ulrich W Weger
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2013-01

4.  Friends and foes in the lexicon: homophone naming in aphasia.

Authors:  Erica L Middleton; Qi Chen; Jay Verkuilen
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2014-10-20       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  Comparing audio and video data for rating communication.

Authors:  Kristine Williams; Ruth Herman; Daniel Bontempo
Journal:  West J Nurs Res       Date:  2013-04-10       Impact factor: 1.967

6.  10 years of BAWLing into affective and aesthetic processes in reading: what are the echoes?

Authors:  Arthur M Jacobs; Melissa L-H Võ; Benny B Briesemeister; Markus Conrad; Markus J Hofmann; Lars Kuchinke; Jana Lüdtke; Mario Braun
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-06-03

7.  Context-dependent lexical ambiguity resolution: MEG evidence for the time-course of activity in left inferior frontal gyrus and posterior middle temporal gyrus.

Authors:  Giovanna Mollo; Elizabeth Jefferies; Piers Cornelissen; Silvia P Gennari
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2018-02-02       Impact factor: 2.381

8.  Crowdsourcing a normative natural language dataset: a comparison of Amazon Mechanical Turk and in-lab data collection.

Authors:  Daniel R Saunders; Peter J Bex; Russell L Woods
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2013-05-20       Impact factor: 5.428

9.  Exploring modality switching effects in negated sentences: further evidence for grounded representations.

Authors:  Lea A Hald; Ian Hocking; David Vernon; Julie-Ann Marshall; Alan Garnham
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-02-28

10.  Measuring information acquisition from sensory input using automated scoring of natural-language descriptions.

Authors:  Daniel R Saunders; Peter J Bex; Dylan J Rose; Russell L Woods
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-02       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.