Literature DB >> 21858582

Length of Barrett's segment predicts success of extensive endomucosal resection for eradication of Barrett's esophagus with early neoplasia.

T Thomas1, L Ayaru, E Y Lee, M Cirocco, G Kandel, G May, P Kortan, N E Marcon.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although the efficacy and safety of extensive endomucosal resection (EMR) in eradicating Barrett's esophagus (BE) harbouring early neoplasia have been established, factors predicting efficacy remains unclear. AIM: To determine the complete eradication rate of Barrett's esophagus with high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia (HGIN) or intramucosal carcinoma (IMC), safety, and factors predicting complete eradication by EMR.
METHODS: Patients with histological confirmation of Barrett's HGIN/IMC were prospectively identified. EMR was performed using Duette multiband ligator or cap technique by a single operator (NEM).
RESULTS: 99 patients (81 males) with median age 67 years [interquartile range (IQR) 60-77 years] and median Barrett's length 4 cm (IQR 2-6 cm) were included. Of 628 index EMRs [mean 6.3, median 5 (IQR 3-8)], 23% showed IMC, 58.5% showed HGIN, and 16% showed low-grade dysplasia only. A median of 8 EMR resections per patient (IQR 6-16, 1,064 resections in 89 patients) resulted in complete eradication of BE harboring neoplasia in 49.4% and eradication of HGIN/IMC in 81% (BE <5 cm subgroup: 65% complete eradication and 91% HGIN eradication) at median follow-up of 18 months (range 6-27 months). On univariate analysis, focal dysplasia (P = 0.003) and Barrett's length <5 cm (P = 0.001) were predictors of complete BE eradication. Barrett's length <5 cm was the only significant predictor [odds ratio (OR) 3.4, standard error (SE) 0.11, P = 0.0006] on multiple logistic regression analysis. Strictures developed in 27% and major bleeding in 2% with no procedure-related perforations or mortality.
CONCLUSIONS: Extensive EMR for removal of BE with early neoplasia is safe. Outcomes for complete BE eradication are modest at 49.4% and eradication of high-grade dysplasia at 81%. Barrett's length <5 cm is the only significant predictor of complete response.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21858582     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-011-1769-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  26 in total

1.  Outcomes of esophagectomy at academic centers: an association between volume and outcome.

Authors:  Kevin M Reavis; Brian R Smith; Marcelo W Hinojosa; Ninh T Nguyen
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 0.688

2.  The location and frequency of intestinal metaplasia at the esophagogastric junction in 223 consecutive autopsies: implications for patient treatment and preventive strategies in Barrett's esophagus.

Authors:  A H Ormsby; S P Kilgore; J R Goldblum; J E Richter; T W Rice; T L Gramlich
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 7.842

3.  Endoscopic mucosal resection of early cancer and high-grade dysplasia in Barrett's esophagus.

Authors:  C Ell; A May; L Gossner; O Pech; E Günter; G Mayer; R Henrich; M Vieth; H Müller; G Seitz; M Stolte
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 22.682

4.  Endoscopic mucosal resection with a cap-fitted panendoscope for esophagus, stomach, and colon mucosal lesions.

Authors:  H Inoue; K Takeshita; H Hori; Y Muraoka; H Yoneshima; M Endo
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1993 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 9.427

5.  The Vienna classification of gastrointestinal epithelial neoplasia.

Authors:  R J Schlemper; R H Riddell; Y Kato; F Borchard; H S Cooper; S M Dawsey; M F Dixon; C M Fenoglio-Preiser; J F Fléjou; K Geboes; T Hattori; T Hirota; M Itabashi; M Iwafuchi; A Iwashita; Y I Kim; T Kirchner; M Klimpfinger; M Koike; G Y Lauwers; K J Lewin; G Oberhuber; F Offner; A B Price; C A Rubio; M Shimizu; T Shimoda; P Sipponen; E Solcia; M Stolte; H Watanabe; H Yamabe
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 23.059

6.  Endoscopic mucosal resection for lesions with endoscopic features suggestive of malignancy and high-grade dysplasia within Barrett's esophagus.

Authors:  P K Nijhawan; K K Wang
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 9.427

7.  Stepwise radical endoscopic resection is effective for complete removal of Barrett's esophagus with early neoplasia: a prospective study.

Authors:  Femke P Peters; Mohammed A Kara; Wilda D Rosmolen; Fiebo J W ten Kate; Kausilia K Krishnadath; J Jan B van Lanschot; Paul Fockens; Jacques J G H M Bergman
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 10.864

8.  Circumferential endoscopic mucosal resection in Barrett's esophagus with high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia or mucosal cancer. Preliminary results in 21 patients.

Authors:  M Giovannini; E Bories; C Pesenti; V Moutardier; G Monges; C Danisi; B Lelong; J R Delpero
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 10.093

9.  Esophageal stenosis after endoscopic mucosal resection of superficial esophageal lesions.

Authors:  Chikatoshi Katada; Manabu Muto; Tetsuro Manabe; Narikazu Boku; Atsushi Ohtsu; Shigeaki Yoshida
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 9.427

10.  Radiofrequency ablation in Barrett's esophagus with dysplasia.

Authors:  Nicholas J Shaheen; Prateek Sharma; Bergein F Overholt; Herbert C Wolfsen; Richard E Sampliner; Kenneth K Wang; Joseph A Galanko; Mary P Bronner; John R Goldblum; Ana E Bennett; Blair A Jobe; Glenn M Eisen; M Brian Fennerty; John G Hunter; David E Fleischer; Virender K Sharma; Robert H Hawes; Brenda J Hoffman; Richard I Rothstein; Stuart R Gordon; Hiroshi Mashimo; Kenneth J Chang; V Raman Muthusamy; Steven A Edmundowicz; Stuart J Spechler; Ali A Siddiqui; Rhonda F Souza; Anthony Infantolino; Gary W Falk; Michael B Kimmey; Ryan D Madanick; Amitabh Chak; Charles J Lightdale
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-05-28       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  6 in total

1.  Radiofrequency ablation for Barrett's-associated intramucosal carcinoma: a multi-center follow-up study.

Authors:  Adam C Strauss; Agoston T Agoston; Parambir S Dulai; Amitabh Srivastava; Richard I Rothstein
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  The impact of flexible endoscopy in esophageal surgery.

Authors:  Alejandro Nieponice; Fabio Nachman; Adolfo Badaloni; Franco Ciotola; Cecilia Zubieta; Mauricio Ramirez
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 2.895

3.  Evolving changes in the management of early oesophageal adenocarcinoma in a tertiary centre.

Authors:  N J O'Farrell; J V Reynolds; N Ravi; J O Larkin; V Malik; G F Wilson; C Muldoon; D O'Toole
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2012-12-16       Impact factor: 1.568

4.  Management of early-stage esophageal neoplasia (MESEN) consensus.

Authors:  Alejandro Nieponice; Adolfo E Badaloni; Blair A Jobe; Toshitaka Hoppo; Carlos Pellegrini; Vic Velanovich; Gary W Falk; Kevin Reavis; Lee Swanstrom; Virender K Sharma; Fabio Nachman; Franco F Ciotola; Luis E Caro; Cecilio Cerisoli; Demetrio Cavadas; Luis Durand Figueroa; Daniel Pirchi; Michael Gibson; Santiago Elizalde; Henry Cohen
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 5.  EMR is not inferior to ESD for early Barrett's and EGJ neoplasia: An extensive review on outcome, recurrence and complication rates.

Authors:  Yoriaki Komeda; Marco Bruno; Arjun Koch
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2014-05-07

6.  Barrett's esophagus: review of diagnosis and treatment.

Authors:  Raja Shekhar Sappati Biyyani; Amithab Chak
Journal:  Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf)       Date:  2013-04-30
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.