Literature DB >> 21857758

The Impact of Research Grant Funding on Scientific Productivity.

Brian A Jacob1, Lars Lefgren.   

Abstract

In this paper, we estimate the impact of receiving an NIH grant on subsequent publications and citations. Our sample consists of all applications (unsuccessful as well as successful) to the NIH from 1980 to 2000 for standard research grants (R01s). Both OLS and IV estimates show that receipt of an NIH research grant (worth roughly $1.7 million) leads to only one additional publication over the next five years, which corresponds to a 7 percent increase. The limited impact of NIH grants is consistent with a model in which the market for research funding is competitive, so that the loss of an NIH grant simply causes researchers to shift to another source of funding.

Entities:  

Year:  2011        PMID: 21857758      PMCID: PMC3156466          DOI: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2011.05.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Public Econ        ISSN: 0047-2727


  1 in total

1.  The Matthew effect in science. The reward and communication systems of science are considered.

Authors:  R K Merton
Journal:  Science       Date:  1968-01-05       Impact factor: 47.728

  1 in total
  24 in total

1.  Percentile ranking and citation impact of a large cohort of National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute-funded cardiovascular R01 grants.

Authors:  Narasimhan Danthi; Colin O Wu; Peibei Shi; Michael Lauer
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2014-01-09       Impact factor: 17.367

2.  Mentoring Experiences and Publication Productivity among Early Career Biomedical Investigators and Trainees.

Authors:  Ángela Gutiérrez; Lourdes R Guerrero; Heather E McCreath; Steven P Wallace
Journal:  Ethn Dis       Date:  2021-04-15       Impact factor: 1.847

3.  Training Patterns and Lifetime Career Achievements of US Academic Cardiothoracic Surgeons.

Authors:  Carlo Maria Rosati; Nakul P Valsangkar; Mario Gaudino; David Blitzer; Panos N Vardas; Leonard N Girardi; Mark W Turrentine; John W Brown; Leonidas G Koniaris
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Pro-Con Perspectives on Ethics in Surgical Research: Update from the 39th Annual Surgical Infection Society Meeting.

Authors:  Vanessa P Ho; Evelyn I Truong; Saira Nisar; Addison K May; Gregory J Beilman; Donald E Fry; Philip S Barie; Jared M Huston; Jeffrey W Shupp; Fredric M Pieracci
Journal:  Surg Infect (Larchmt)       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 2.150

5.  Association of percentile ranking with citation impact and productivity in a large cohort of de novo NIMH-funded R01 grants.

Authors:  J M Doyle; K Quinn; Y A Bodenstein; C O Wu; N Danthi; M S Lauer
Journal:  Mol Psychiatry       Date:  2015-06-02       Impact factor: 15.992

6.  The Matthew effect in science funding.

Authors:  Thijs Bol; Mathijs de Vaan; Arnout van de Rijt
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-04-23       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Public R&D Investments and Private-sector Patenting: Evidence from NIH Funding Rules.

Authors:  Pierre Azoulay; Danielle Li; Joshua S Graff Zivin; Bhaven N Sampat
Journal:  Rev Econ Stud       Date:  2018-06-15

8.  Administrative Discretion in Scientific Funding: Evidence from a Prestigious Postdoctoral Training Program.

Authors:  Donna K Ginther; Misty L Heggeness
Journal:  Res Policy       Date:  2020-03-14

9.  The Effects of Research & Development Funding on Scientific Productivity: Academic Chemistry, 1990-2009.

Authors:  Joshua L Rosenbloom; Donna K Ginther; Ted Juhl; Joseph A Heppert
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-15       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  How to Receive More Funding for Your Research? Get Connected to the Right People!

Authors:  Ashkan Ebadi; Andrea Schiffauerova
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-29       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.