Literature DB >> 21857046

Ilizarov technique of lengthening and then nailing for height increase.

Khaled Emara1, Amr Farouk, Rami Diab.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the risks and types of complications associated with the Ilizarov technique of lengthening and then nailing in persons of normal height.
METHODS: Records of 26 men and 6 women aged 21 to 47 (mean, 27) years with body height of 160 to 176 (mean, 170) cm who underwent tibial and fibular lengthening and then intramedullary nailing were reviewed. They were skeletally mature healthy persons, with no systemic/local bone disease, deformity or limb length discrepancy. Pain was assessed using the visual analogue scale (VAS). Patient satisfaction in terms of the treatment outcomes and expectations was also assessed. Complications encountered during or after treatment were recorded.
RESULTS: The mean lengthening achieved was 7.6 (range, 3.5-12) cm or 26% (range, 10-40%) of the original length. The mean duration of external fixation was 96 (range, 45-135) days. The mean follow-up duration after intramedullary nailing was 38.7 (range, 24-93) months. The mean VAS pain score was 9.3 at week 1, 6.6 at week 4, and 5.7 at week 8. After intramedullary nailing, the mean VAS pain score was 2.6 at week 4, 0.9 at month 6, and 0.3 at year 1. 91% of the patients were satisfied with the outcome at week 6; 81% after intramedullary nailing, and 94% at the one-year follow-up. Four patients had revision operations: one for pin exchange owing to pin bending after a fall, one for adjusting external rotation of the tibia after nailing, one for bone grafting for delayed union, and one for drainage of a haematoma just after nailing.
CONCLUSION: Most complications related to patient discomfort and psychological stress, which were important issues in this type of patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21857046     DOI: 10.1177/230949901101900215

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong)        ISSN: 1022-5536            Impact factor:   1.118


  7 in total

1.  Editorial: indications--on the fringes and in the mainstream.

Authors:  Seth S Leopold; Sanjeev Sabharwal
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-09-11       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Cost of external fixation vs external fixation then nailing in bone infection.

Authors:  Khaled Mohamed Emara; Ramy Ahmed Diab; Khaled Abd El Ghafar
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2015-01-18

3.  Functional recovery of daily living and sports activities after cosmetic bilateral tibia lengthening.

Authors:  Kun-Bo Park; Yoon Hae Kwak; Jung Woo Lee; Byoung Kyu Park; Hoon Park; Dong Hoon Lee
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-10-11       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Cosmetic lower limb lengthening by Ilizarov apparatus: what are the risks?

Authors:  Konstantin I Novikov; Koushik N Subramanyam; Serghei O Muradisinov; Olga S Novikova; Elina S Kolesnikova
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-09-03       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Incidence and analysis of open fractures of the midshaft and distal femur.

Authors:  Florian M Kovar; Manuela Jaindl; Rupert Schuster; Georg Endler; Patrick Platzer
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 1.704

6.  Cosmetic stature lengthening: systematic review of outcomes and complications.

Authors:  Yousef Marwan; Dan Cohen; Mohammed Alotaibi; Abdullah Addar; Mitchell Bernstein; Reggie Hamdy
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2020-07-08       Impact factor: 5.853

Review 7.  Exploring the Ethics of Stature Lengthening as Treatment for Height Dysphoria.

Authors:  Richard C Lee; Mark Aulisio; Raymond W Liu
Journal:  Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr       Date:  2020 Sep-Dec
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.