OBJECTIVE: To examine the health benefits of a bedroom window view to natural surroundings for patients undergoing a residential rehabilitation programme. DESIGN: Longitudinal quasi-experiment. SETTING: A residential rehabilitation centre. SUBJECTS: Two-hundred and seventy-eight coronary and pulmonary patients provided data at all measurement points during the programme. INTERVENTION: Blind, quasi-random allocation to a private bedroom with a panoramic view to natural surroundings or with a view either partially or entirely blocked by buildings. MAIN MEASURES: Self-reported physical and mental health (SF-12), subjective well-being, emotional states, use of the private bedroom and leisure activities. RESULTS: For women, a blocked view appeared to negatively influence change in physical health (time × view × gender interaction, F(4,504) = 2.51, P = 0.04), whereas for men, a blocked view appeared to negatively influence change in mental health (time × view × gender interaction, F(4,504) = 5.67, P < 0.01). Pulmonary patients with a panoramic view showed greater improvement in mental health than coronary patients with such a view (time × view × diagnostic group interaction, F(4,504) = 2.76, P = 0.03). Those with a panoramic view to nature more often chose to stay in their bedroom when they wanted to be alone than those with a blocked view (odds ratio (OR) = 2.32, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.08-5.01). CONCLUSION: An unobstructed bedroom view to natural surroundings appears to have better supported improvement in self-reported physical and mental health during a residential rehabilitation programme, although the degree of change varied with gender and diagnostic group.
OBJECTIVE: To examine the health benefits of a bedroom window view to natural surroundings for patients undergoing a residential rehabilitation programme. DESIGN: Longitudinal quasi-experiment. SETTING: A residential rehabilitation centre. SUBJECTS: Two-hundred and seventy-eight coronary and pulmonarypatients provided data at all measurement points during the programme. INTERVENTION: Blind, quasi-random allocation to a private bedroom with a panoramic view to natural surroundings or with a view either partially or entirely blocked by buildings. MAIN MEASURES: Self-reported physical and mental health (SF-12), subjective well-being, emotional states, use of the private bedroom and leisure activities. RESULTS: For women, a blocked view appeared to negatively influence change in physical health (time × view × gender interaction, F(4,504) = 2.51, P = 0.04), whereas for men, a blocked view appeared to negatively influence change in mental health (time × view × gender interaction, F(4,504) = 5.67, P < 0.01). Pulmonarypatients with a panoramic view showed greater improvement in mental health than coronary patients with such a view (time × view × diagnostic group interaction, F(4,504) = 2.76, P = 0.03). Those with a panoramic view to nature more often chose to stay in their bedroom when they wanted to be alone than those with a blocked view (odds ratio (OR) = 2.32, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.08-5.01). CONCLUSION: An unobstructed bedroom view to natural surroundings appears to have better supported improvement in self-reported physical and mental health during a residential rehabilitation programme, although the degree of change varied with gender and diagnostic group.
Authors: Melissa R Marselle; Katherine N Irvine; Altea Lorenzo-Arribas; Sara L Warber Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2014-12-23 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Danielle F Shanahan; Thomas Astell-Burt; Elizabeth A Barber; Eric Brymer; Daniel T C Cox; Julie Dean; Michael Depledge; Richard A Fuller; Terry Hartig; Katherine N Irvine; Andy Jones; Heidy Kikillus; Rebecca Lovell; Richard Mitchell; Jari Niemelä; Mark Nieuwenhuijsen; Jules Pretty; Mardie Townsend; Yolanda van Heezik; Sara Warber; Kevin J Gaston Journal: Sports (Basel) Date: 2019-06-10
Authors: Marcia P Jimenez; Nicole V DeVille; Elise G Elliott; Jessica E Schiff; Grete E Wilt; Jaime E Hart; Peter James Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-04-30 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Yu-Tzu Wu; Linda Clare; Ian Rees Jones; Sharon M Nelis; Catherine Quinn; Anthony Martyr; Christina R Victor; Ruth A Lamont; Isla Rippon; Fiona E Matthews Journal: Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol Date: 2021-01-23 Impact factor: 4.328