Literature DB >> 21856229

PGD and aneuploidy screening for 24 chromosomes: advantages and disadvantages of competing platforms.

A Bisignano1, D Wells, G Harton, S Munné.   

Abstract

Diagnosis of embryos for chromosome abnormalities, i.e. aneuploidy screening, has been invigorated by the introduction of microarray-based testing methods allowing analysis of 24 chromosomes in one test. Recent data have been suggestive of increased implantation and pregnancy rates following microarray testing. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis for infertility aims to test for gross chromosome changes with the hope that identification and transfer of normal embryos will improve IVF outcomes. Testing by some methods, specifically single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) microarrays, allow for more information and potential insight into parental origin of aneuploidy and uniparental disomy. The usefulness and validity of reporting this information is flawed. Numerous papers have shown that the majority of meiotic errors occur in the egg, while mitotic errors in the embryo affect parental chromosomes at random. Potential mistakes made in assigning an error as meiotic or mitotic may lead to erroneous reporting of results with medical consequences. This study's data suggest that the bioinformatic cleaning used to 'fix' the miscalls that plague single-cell whole-genome amplification provides little improvement in the quality of useful data. Based on the information available, SNP-based aneuploidy screening suffers from a number of serious issues that must be resolved.
Copyright © 2011 Reproductive Healthcare Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21856229     DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2011.05.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online        ISSN: 1472-6483            Impact factor:   3.828


  5 in total

1.  The number of biopsied trophectoderm cells may affect pregnancy outcomes.

Authors:  Luis Guzman; D Nuñez; R López; N Inoue; J Portella; F Vizcarra; L Noriega-Portella; L Noriega-Hoces; S Munné
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2018-10-17       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Age, body weight and ovarian function affect oocyte size and morphology in non-PCOS patients undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI).

Authors:  A Weghofer; V A Kushnir; S K Darmon; H Jafri; E Lazzaroni-Tealdi; L Zhang; D F Albertini; D H Barad; N Gleicher
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-10-24       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Preimplantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidy and translocations using array comparative genomic hybridization.

Authors:  Santiago Munné
Journal:  Curr Genomics       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 2.236

4.  Letter to the editor by megan Hall.

Authors:  Jennifer Saucier; Katrina Merrion; Janine Mash; Barbara Pettersen; Megan Hall; Zachary Demko
Journal:  Curr Genomics       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 2.236

5.  Pre-implantation genetic diagnosis and pre-implantation genetic screening: two years experience at a single center.

Authors:  Se Yeon Won; Hannah Kim; Woo Sik Lee; Ji Won Kim; Sung Han Shim
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Sci       Date:  2018-01-05
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.