Charles Glisson1, Philip Green. 1. Children's Mental Health Services Research Center, Henson Hall University of Tennessee, Knoxville, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This study examines the association of organizational climate, casework services, and youth outcomes in child welfare systems. Building on preliminary findings linking organizational climate to youth outcomes over a 3-year follow-up period, the current study extends the follow-up period to 7 years and tests main, moderating and mediating effects of organizational climate and casework services on outcomes. METHODS: The study applies hierarchical linear models (HLMs) analyses to all 5 waves of the National Survey of Child and Adolescent Well-being (NSCAW) with a US nationwide sample of 1,678 maltreated youth aged 4-16 years and 1,696 caseworkers from 88 child welfare systems. Organizational climate is assessed on 2 dimensions, Engagement and Stress, with scales from the well established measure, Organizational Social Context (OSC); youth outcomes are measured as problems in psychosocial functioning with the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL); and casework services are assessed with original scales developed for the study and completed by the maltreated youths' primary caregivers and caseworkers. RESULTS: Maltreated youth served by child welfare systems with more engaged organizational climates have significantly better outcomes. Moreover, the quantity and quality of casework services neither mediate nor interact with the effects of organizational climate on youth outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Organizational climate is associated with youth outcomes in child welfare systems, but a better understanding is needed of the mechanisms that link organizational climate to outcomes. In addition, there is a need for evidence-based organizational interventions that can improve the organizational climates and effectiveness of child welfare systems.
OBJECTIVE: This study examines the association of organizational climate, casework services, and youth outcomes in child welfare systems. Building on preliminary findings linking organizational climate to youth outcomes over a 3-year follow-up period, the current study extends the follow-up period to 7 years and tests main, moderating and mediating effects of organizational climate and casework services on outcomes. METHODS: The study applies hierarchical linear models (HLMs) analyses to all 5 waves of the National Survey of Child and Adolescent Well-being (NSCAW) with a US nationwide sample of 1,678 maltreated youth aged 4-16 years and 1,696 caseworkers from 88 child welfare systems. Organizational climate is assessed on 2 dimensions, Engagement and Stress, with scales from the well established measure, Organizational Social Context (OSC); youth outcomes are measured as problems in psychosocial functioning with the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL); and casework services are assessed with original scales developed for the study and completed by the maltreated youths' primary caregivers and caseworkers. RESULTS: Maltreated youth served by child welfare systems with more engaged organizational climates have significantly better outcomes. Moreover, the quantity and quality of casework services neither mediate nor interact with the effects of organizational climate on youth outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Organizational climate is associated with youth outcomes in child welfare systems, but a better understanding is needed of the mechanisms that link organizational climate to outcomes. In addition, there is a need for evidence-based organizational interventions that can improve the organizational climates and effectiveness of child welfare systems.
Authors: Sarah McCue Horwitz; Michael S Hurlburt; Jeremy D Goldhaber-Fiebert; Lawrence A Palinkas; Jennifer Rolls-Reutz; Jinjin Zhang; Emily Fisher; John Landsverk Journal: Child Youth Serv Rev Date: 2014-04-01
Authors: Rinad S Beidas; Julie Edmunds; Matthew Ditty; Jessica Watkins; Lucia Walsh; Steven Marcus; Philip Kendall Journal: Adm Policy Ment Health Date: 2014-11
Authors: Kim C Brimhall; Karissa Fenwick; Lauren R Farahnak; Michael S Hurlburt; Scott C Roesch; Gregory A Aarons Journal: Adm Policy Ment Health Date: 2016-09
Authors: Rinad S Beidas; Matthew P Mychailyszyn; Julie M Edmunds; Muniya S Khanna; Margaret Mary Downey; Philip C Kendall Journal: School Ment Health Date: 2012-12-01
Authors: Laura C Skriner; Courtney Benjamin Wolk; Rebecca E Stewart; Danielle R Adams; Ronnie M Rubin; Arthur C Evans; Rinad S Beidas Journal: J Behav Health Serv Res Date: 2018-04 Impact factor: 1.505
Authors: Sarah A Helseth; Samuel O Peer; Funlola Are; Alyssa M Korell; Benjamin E Saunders; Sonja K Schoenwald; Jason E Chapman; Rochelle F Hanson Journal: Adm Policy Ment Health Date: 2020-07