Literature DB >> 21855937

Degree of urge, perception of bladder fullness and bladder volume--how are they related?

Rhea Heeringa1, Gommert A van Koeveringe, Bjorn Winkens, Philip E V van Kerrebroeck, Stefan G G de Wachter.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We evaluated the reliability of the degree of urge and perception of bladder fullness scales, the relationship between the scales and bladder volume, and possible differences between bladder sensations experienced in a controlled or an uncontrolled setting.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Volunteers and patients with overactive bladder symptoms participated in the protocols. They were asked to grade bladder sensation on a 4-point urge scale of no sensation to need to void now and assess the perception of fullness on a visual analog scale of empty to full bladder. This was assessed in a 3-day bladder diary and during controlled, noninvasive bladder filling.
RESULTS: Each scale was reliable and significantly related to bladder volume (p <0.001). Agreement between the scales and voided volume was poor. Patients and volunteers grade bladder fullness and degree of urge higher in an uncontrolled than in a controlled setting.
CONCLUSIONS: The perception of bladder fullness and the degree of urge have a significant relation to bladder volume in controlled and uncontrolled settings. Due to poor agreement between the scales and actual voided volume these scales cannot replace measuring voided volume. The perception of bladder sensation depends on the setting. Bladder sensation at the hospital might underestimate the bother of symptoms experienced by a patient in daily life.
Copyright © 2011 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21855937     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2011.05.050

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  4 in total

1.  Bladder volume correction factors measured with 3D ultrasound and BladderScan.

Authors:  Naomi N Vinod; Anna S Nagle; Hameeda A Naimi; Hiren Kolli; Derek Sheen; Naveen Nandanan; Laura R Carucci; John E Speich; Adam P Klausner
Journal:  Can J Urol       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 1.344

2.  Protocol for a prospective, randomized study on neurophysiological assessment of lower urinary tract function in a healthy cohort.

Authors:  Stéphanie van der Lely; Martina Stefanovic; Melanie R Schmidhalter; Marta Pittavino; Reinhard Furrer; Martina D Liechti; Martin Schubert; Thomas M Kessler; Ulrich Mehnert
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2016-11-25       Impact factor: 2.264

3.  Validation of a water-load protocol to define the pattern of bladder sensation.

Authors:  Hayser Medina Lucena; Douglas G Tincello
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2018-08-18       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 4.  Can Interoception Improve the Pragmatic Search for Biomarkers in Psychiatry?

Authors:  Sahib S Khalsa; Rachel C Lapidus
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2016-07-25       Impact factor: 4.157

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.