Literature DB >> 21855868

Self-expandable metal stents for relieving malignant colorectal obstruction: short-term safety and efficacy within 30 days of stent procedure in 447 patients.

Søren Meisner1, Ferran González-Huix, Jo G Vandervoort, Paul Goldberg, Juan A Casellas, Oscar Roncero, Karl E Grund, Alberto Alvarez, Jesús García-Cano, Enrique Vázquez-Astray, Javier Jiménez-Pérez.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The self-expandable metal stent (SEMS) can alleviate malignant colonic obstruction and avoid emergency decompressive surgery.
OBJECTIVE: To document performance, safety, and effectiveness of colorectal stents used per local standards of practice in patients with malignant large-bowel obstruction to avoid palliative stoma surgery in incurable patients (PAL) and facilitate bowel decompression as a bridge to surgery for curable patients (BTS).
DESIGN: Prospective clinical cohort study.
SETTING: Two global registries with 39 academic and community centers. PATIENTS: This study involved 447 patients with malignant colonic obstruction who received stents (255 PAL, 182 BTS, 10 no indication specified). INTERVENTION: Colorectal through-the-scope SEMS placement. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: The primary endpoint was clinical success at 30 days, defined as the patient's ability to maintain bowel function without adverse events related to the procedure or stent. Secondary endpoints were procedural success, defined as successful stent placement in the correct position, symptoms of persistent or recurrent colonic obstruction, and complications.
RESULTS: The procedural success rate was 94.8% (439/463), and the clinical success rates were 90.5% (313/346) as assessed on a per protocol basis and 71.6% (313/437) as assessed on an intent-to-treat basis. Complications included 15 (3.9%) perforations, 3 resulting in death, 7 (1.8%) migrations, 7 (1.8%) cases of pain, and 2 (0.5%) cases of bleeding. LIMITATIONS: No control group. No primary endpoint analysis data for 25% of patients.
CONCLUSION: This largest multicenter, prospective study of colonic SEMS placement demonstrates that colonic SEMSs are safe and highly effective for the short-term treatment of malignant colorectal obstruction, allowing most curable patients to have 1-step resection without stoma and providing most incurable patients minimally invasive palliation instead of surgery. The risk of complications, including perforation, was low.
Copyright © 2011 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21855868     DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.06.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc        ISSN: 0016-5107            Impact factor:   9.427


  32 in total

Review 1.  Self-Expanding Metallic Stents for the Management of Emergency Malignant Large Bowel Obstruction: a Systematic Review.

Authors:  Yasoba Nayanapriya Atukorale; Jody Lynne Church; Benjamin Lee Hoggan; Robyn Sheree Lambert; Stefanie Lynette Gurgacz; Stephen Goodall; Guy J Maddern
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Colonic stent placement as a bridge to surgery in patients with left-sided malignant large bowel obstruction. An observational study.

Authors:  S Occhionorelli; D Tartarini; L Cappellari; R Stano; G Vasquez
Journal:  G Chir       Date:  2014 Nov-Dec

3.  Patients who failed endoscopic stenting for left-sided malignant colorectal obstruction suffered the worst outcomes.

Authors:  Tian-Zhi Lim; Dedrick Chan; Ker-Kan Tan
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2014-07-02       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Clinical outcomes following secondary self-expandable metal stent (SEMS) insertion due to previous stent migration in malignant colorectal obstruction.

Authors:  A Ra Choi; Jin Young Yoon; Hyun Jung Lee; Hui Won Jang; Soo Jung Park; Sung Pil Hong; Tae Il Kim; Won Ho Kim; Jae Hee Cheon
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-03-22       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Oncologic safety of stent as bridge to surgery compared to emergency radical surgery for left-sided colorectal cancer obstruction.

Authors:  Hun Jin Kim; Jung Wook Huh; Wu Seong Kang; Chang Hyun Kim; Sang Woo Lim; Young Eun Joo; Hyeong Rok Kim; Young Jin Kim
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-02-23       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Colonic stenting: a practical update.

Authors:  Sanchoy Sarkar; Joe Geraghty; Paul Rooney
Journal:  Frontline Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-03-12

7.  Stenting for colorectal cancer obstruction compared to surgery--a study of consecutive patients in a single institution.

Authors:  Eva Angenete; Dan Asplund; Maria Bergström; Per-Ola Park
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2011-11-29       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Covered self-expandable metal stents are more associated with complications in the management of malignant colorectal obstruction.

Authors:  Jae Hyuk Choi; Yoo Jin Lee; Eun Soo Kim; Jong Hwan Choi; Kwang Bum Cho; Kyung Sik Park; Byoung Kuk Jang; Woo Jin Chung; Jae Seok Hwang
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-03-14       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Meta-analysis of randomized trials comparing endoscopic stenting and surgical decompression for colorectal cancer obstruction.

Authors:  Vincenzo Cennamo; Carmelo Luigiano; Federico Coccolini; Carlo Fabbri; Marco Bassi; Giuseppe De Caro; Liza Ceroni; Antonella Maimone; Paolo Ravelli; Luca Ansaloni
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2012-11-15       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 10.  Treatment of colorectal cancer in older patients.

Authors:  Riccardo A Audisio; Demetris Papamichael
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2012-10-09       Impact factor: 46.802

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.