Literature DB >> 21855854

Transplantation of high panel-reactive antibody left ventricular assist device patients without crossmatch using on-bypass pheresis and alemtuzumab.

Scott D Lick1, Daniel L Beckles, Giovanni Piovesana, Smita Vaidya, Alexander Indrikovs, N Alexander Barbagelata, Vincent Valentine.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Highly sensitized (HS) left ventricular assist device (LVAD) patients with high panel-reactive antibody (PRA) levels present a challenge. Alemtuzumab, a potent depleting agent for T and B lymphocytes (months to years), and plasmapheresis, offer an opportunity for heart transplantation to these patients who might die of VAD complications on the transplant waiting list. This study compared rates of acute rejection and survival of a HS LVAD cohort with a contemporaneous control group after heart transplant.
METHODS: Clinical courses of 31 consecutive patients who underwent transplantation between January 2006 and January 2011 were reviewed. Eight patients with a T or B PRA of 70 or more (HS+) received non-crossmatched, ABO-compatible hearts using intraoperative plasmapheresis and alemtuzumab induction. Controls (HS-) received basiliximab induction. Acute rejection was defined as International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation grades 2R or higher, or antibody-mediated rejection.
RESULTS: The difference in survival between HS+ and HS- groups at 1 year (100% vs 94%) or at a mean follow-up of 2.3 and 2.4 years (75% vs 70%) was not significant. Retrospective lymphocytotoxic crossmatches were positive in 7 of 8 HS+ patients (6 T+ and B+, 1 B+) vs none in the HS- group (p < 0.001). There was a trend toward increased risk of cellular rejection per 100 patient-days beyond 1 year in the HS+ group (p = 0.07). Risk of humoral rejection was significantly increased in the HS+ group (38% vs 4%; p = 0.04).
CONCLUSIONS: Heart transplantation with plasmapheresis and alemtuzumab in HS LVAD patients, most with a positive crossmatch, does not compromise midterm survival. The expected higher rates of rejection, especially beyond the first postoperative year, demand adjustments in surveillance strategies and immunosuppressive management.
Copyright © 2011 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21855854     DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2011.04.064

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  5 in total

Review 1.  Ventricular assist devices: pharmacological aspects of a mechanical therapy.

Authors:  O Wever-Pinzon; J Stehlik; A G Kfoury; J V Terrovitis; N A Diakos; C Charitos; D Y Li; S G Drakos
Journal:  Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2012-01-16       Impact factor: 12.310

Review 2.  Donor selection in heart transplantation.

Authors:  Ahmet Kilic; Sitaramesh Emani; Chittoor B Sai-Sudhakar; Robert S D Higgins; Bryan A Whitson
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 3.  Human leukocyte antigens and alloimmunization in heart transplantation: an open debate.

Authors:  Antonietta Picascia; Vincenzo Grimaldi; Amelia Casamassimi; Maria Rosaria De Pascale; Concetta Schiano; Claudio Napoli
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2014-09-05       Impact factor: 4.132

4.  The Approach to Antibodies After Heart Transplantation.

Authors:  Olivia N Gilbert; Patricia P Chang
Journal:  Curr Transplant Rep       Date:  2017-08-11

5.  Profound hyperacute cardiac allograft rejection rescue with biventricular mechanical circulatory support and plasmapheresis, intravenous immunoglobulin, and rituximab therapy.

Authors:  David J Kaczorowski; Jashodeep Datta; Malek Kamoun; Daniel L Dries; Y Joseph Woo
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2013-03-16       Impact factor: 1.637

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.