Bivariate phase-rectified signal averaging for assessment of spontaneous baroreflex sensitivity: normalization of the results.

BACKGROUND: Previously proposed technique for assessment of spontaneous baroreflex sensitivity (BRS) based on bivariate phase-rectified signal averaging measures averaged R-R interval (RRI) changes triggered by beat-to-beat increases in systolic blood pressure (SBP). In this study, we investigate a normalized version of the method that relates the averaged RRI changes to the triggering blood pressure changes, thus providing the results in measurement units comparable with existing literature.
METHODS: Data of previously reported prospective observational study were used. In each of 146 heart failure patients presenting with sinus rhythm, 10-minute recordings of electrocardiogram and arterial and blood pressures were obtained in the supine resting position. The averaged RRI increases initiated by beat-to-beat SBP increases were measured (original BRS result in milliseconds) and normalized for the averaged beat-to-beat SBP increases (normalized BRS result in milliseconds per millimeters of mercury). Both results were compared in terms of predicting all-cause mortality during a mean follow-up of 2.7 ± 1.1 years when 42 patients (28.8%) died.
RESULTS: Both types of results were highly correlated (r = 0.938, P < .001) and led to similarly strong separation of high- and low-risk groups. The receiver operator characteristics of both indices were well within the 95% confidence intervals of each other, and the areas under the characteristics were practically identical: 71.1% (95% confidence interval, 60.7%-80.9%) for original BRS and 69.7% (58.9%-79.2%) for normalized BRS.
CONCLUSION: The results might question the concept of a linear relationship between the SBP changes and RRI changes. The phase-rectified signal averaging-based assessment of BRS may be used with equal legitimacy in the nonnormalized and normalized forms; the normalized form provides results in conventional measurement units.