Literature DB >> 21855058

Numerical ordering ability mediates the relation between number-sense and arithmetic competence.

Ian M Lyons1, Sian L Beilock.   

Abstract

What predicts human mathematical competence? While detailed models of number representation in the brain have been developed, it remains to be seen exactly how basic number representations link to higher math abilities. We propose that representation of ordinal associations between numerical symbols is one important factor that underpins this link. We show that individual variability in symbolic number-ordering ability strongly predicts performance on complex mental-arithmetic tasks even when controlling for several competing factors, including approximate number acuity. Crucially, symbolic number-ordering ability fully mediates the previously reported relation between approximate number acuity and more complex mathematical skills, suggesting that symbolic number-ordering may be a stepping stone from approximate number representation to mathematical competence. These results are important for understanding how evolution has interacted with culture to generate complex representations of abstract numerical relationships. Moreover, the finding that symbolic number-ordering ability links approximate number acuity and complex math skills carries implications for designing math-education curricula and identifying reliable markers of math performance during schooling.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21855058     DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2011.07.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cognition        ISSN: 0010-0277


  70 in total

1.  An Introduction to the Approximate Number System.

Authors:  Darko Odic; Ariel Starr
Journal:  Child Dev Perspect       Date:  2018-04-10

2.  Assessing the Approximate Number System: no relation between numerical comparison and estimation tasks.

Authors:  Mathieu Guillaume; Wim Gevers; Alain Content
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2015-03-06

3.  How do individual differences in children's domain specific and domain general abilities relate to brain activity within the intraparietal sulcus during arithmetic? An fMRI study.

Authors:  Anna A Matejko; Daniel Ansari
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2017-05-10       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Nonsymbolic number and cumulative area representations contribute shared and unique variance to symbolic math competence.

Authors:  Stella F Lourenco; Justin W Bonny; Edmund P Fernandez; Sonia Rao
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-10-22       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Intuitive sense of number correlates with math scores on college-entrance examination.

Authors:  Melissa E Libertus; Darko Odic; Justin Halberda
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2012-10-23

6.  Using cognitive training studies to unravel the mechanisms by which the approximate number system supports symbolic math ability.

Authors:  Stephanie Bugden; Nicholas K DeWind; Elizabeth M Brannon
Journal:  Curr Opin Behav Sci       Date:  2016-05-11

7.  Brief non-symbolic, approximate number practice enhances subsequent exact symbolic arithmetic in children.

Authors:  Daniel C Hyde; Saeeda Khanum; Elizabeth S Spelke
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2014-01-22

8.  Distinctive Role of Symbolic Number Sense in Mediating the Mathematical Abilities of Children with Autism.

Authors:  Alexis Hiniker; Miriam Rosenberg-Lee; Vinod Menon
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2016-04

9.  The approximate number system and domain-general abilities as predictors of math ability in children with normal hearing and hearing loss.

Authors:  Rebecca Bull; Marc Marschark; Emily Nordmann; Patricia Sapere; Wendy A Skene
Journal:  Br J Dev Psychol       Date:  2017-08-29

10.  Individual differences in algebraic cognition: Relation to the approximate number and semantic memory systems.

Authors:  David C Geary; Mary K Hoard; Lara Nugent; Jeffrey N Rouder
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  2015-08-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.