Literature DB >> 21854945

Genomic breeding value estimation using genetic markers, inferred ancestral haplotypes, and the genomic relationship matrix.

A P W de Roos1, C Schrooten, T Druet.   

Abstract

With the introduction of new single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) chips of various densities, more and more genotype data sets will include animals genotyped for only a subset of the SNP. Imputation techniques based on unobserved ancestral haplotypes may be used to infer missing genotypes. These ancestral haplotypes may also be used in the genomic prediction model, instead of using the SNP. This may increase the reliability of predictions because the ancestral haplotype may capture more linkage disequilibrium with quantitative trait loci than SNP. The aim of this paper was to study whether using unobserved ancestral haplotypes in a genomic prediction model would provide more reliable genomic predictions than using SNP, and to determine how many loci in the genomic prediction model would be redundant. Genotypes of 8,960 bulls and cows for 39,557 SNP were analyzed with a hidden Markov model to associate each individual at each locus to 2 ancestral haplotypes. The number of ancestral haplotypes per locus was fixed at 10, 15, or 20. Subsequently, a validation study was performed in which the phenotypes of 3,251 progeny-tested bulls for 16 traits were used in a genomic prediction model to predict the estimated breeding values of at least 753 validation bulls. The squared correlation between genomic prediction and deregressed daughter performance estimated breeding value, when averaged across traits, was slightly higher when 15 or 20 ancestral haplotypes per locus were used in the prediction model instead of the SNP genotypes, whereas the prediction model using a genomic relationship matrix gave the lowest squared correlations. The number of redundant loci [i.e., loci that had less than 18 jumps (0.1%) from one ancestral haplotype to another ancestral haplotype at the next locus], was 18,793 (48%), which means that only 20,764 loci would need to be included in the genomic prediction model. This provides opportunities for greatly decreasing computer requirements of genomic evaluations with very large numbers of markers.
Copyright © 2011 American Dairy Science Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21854945     DOI: 10.3168/jds.2010-3905

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dairy Sci        ISSN: 0022-0302            Impact factor:   4.034


  12 in total

Review 1.  Whole-genome regression and prediction methods applied to plant and animal breeding.

Authors:  Gustavo de Los Campos; John M Hickey; Ricardo Pong-Wong; Hans D Daetwyler; Mario P L Calus
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2012-06-28       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Genomic prediction of genetic merit using LD-based haplotypes in the Nordic Holstein population.

Authors:  Beatriz C D Cuyabano; Guosheng Su; Mogens S Lund
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2014-12-23       Impact factor: 3.969

3.  On the distance of genetic relationships and the accuracy of genomic prediction in pig breeding.

Authors:  Theo H E Meuwissen; Jorgen Odegard; Ina Andersen-Ranberg; Eli Grindflek
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 4.297

4.  Genomic Prediction of Complex Phenotypes Using Genic Similarity Based Relatedness Matrix.

Authors:  Ning Gao; Jinyan Teng; Shaopan Ye; Xiaolong Yuan; Shuwen Huang; Hao Zhang; Xiquan Zhang; Jiaqi Li; Zhe Zhang
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2018-08-31       Impact factor: 4.599

5.  Phylogenetic Origin of Primary and Secondary Metabolic Pathway Genes Revealed by C. maxima and C. reticulata Diagnostic SNPs.

Authors:  Milena do Amaral; Marcia Fabiana Barbosa de Paula; Frederique Ollitrault; Ronan Rivallan; Edson Mario de Andrade Silva; Abelmon da Silva Gesteira; François Luro; Dominique Garcia; Patrick Ollitrault; Fabienne Micheli
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2019-09-24       Impact factor: 5.753

6.  The effect of using genealogy-based haplotypes for genomic prediction.

Authors:  Vahid Edriss; Rohan L Fernando; Guosheng Su; Mogens S Lund; Bernt Guldbrandtsen
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2013-03-06       Impact factor: 4.297

7.  Including α s1 casein gene information in genomic evaluations of French dairy goats.

Authors:  Céline Carillier-Jacquin; Hélène Larroque; Christèle Robert-Granié
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2016-08-04       Impact factor: 4.297

8.  Fixed-length haplotypes can improve genomic prediction accuracy in an admixed dairy cattle population.

Authors:  Melanie Hess; Tom Druet; Andrew Hess; Dorian Garrick
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2017-07-03       Impact factor: 4.297

9.  A strategy to improve phasing of whole-genome sequenced individuals through integration of familial information from dense genotype panels.

Authors:  Pierre Faux; Tom Druet
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2017-05-16       Impact factor: 4.297

10.  SNP and Haplotype-Based Genomic Selection of Quantitative Traits in Eucalyptus globulus.

Authors:  Paulina Ballesta; Carlos Maldonado; Paulino Pérez-Rodríguez; Freddy Mora
Journal:  Plants (Basel)       Date:  2019-09-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.