Literature DB >> 21854917

The selective treatment of clinical mastitis based on on-farm culture results: I. Effects on antibiotic use, milk withholding time, and short-term clinical and bacteriological outcomes.

A Lago1, S M Godden, R Bey, P L Ruegg, K Leslie.   

Abstract

The objective of this multi-state, multi-herd clinical trial was to evaluate the efficacy of using an on-farm culture system to guide strategic treatment decisions in cows with clinical mastitis. The study was conducted in 8 commercial dairy farms ranging in size from 144 to 1,795 cows from Minnesota, Wisconsin, and Ontario, Canada. A total of 422 cows affected with mild or moderate clinical mastitis in 449 quarters were randomly assigned to either (1) a positive-control treatment program or (2) an on-farm, culture-based treatment program. Quarter cases assigned to the positive-control group received immediate on-label intramammary treatment with cephapirin sodium. Quarters assigned to the culture-based treatment program were cultured on-farm and treated with cephapirin sodium after 18 to 24h of incubation if they had gram-positive growth or a mixed infection. Quarters with gram-negative or no growth did not receive intramammary therapy. The proportion of quarter cases assigned to positive-control and culture-based treatments that received intramammary antibiotic therapy because of study assignment was 100 and 44%, respectively; the proportion of cases that received secondary antibiotic therapy was 36 and 19%, respectively; and the proportion of cases that received intramammary antibiotic therapy because of study assignment or secondary therapy was 100 and 51%, respectively. A tendency existed for a decrease in the number of days in which milk was discarded from cows assigned to the culture-based treatment program versus cows assigned to the positive-control group (5.9 vs. 5.2 d). No statistically significant differences existed between cases assigned to the positive-control and cases assigned to the culture-based treatment program in days to clinical cure (2.7 vs. 3.2 d), bacteriological cure risk within 21 d of enrollment (71 vs. 60%), new intramammary infection risk within 21 d of enrollment (50 vs. 50%), and treatment failure risk (presence of infection, secondary treatment, clinical mastitis recurrence, or removal from herd within 21 d after enrollment; 81 vs. 78%). In summary, the use of an on-farm culture system to guide the strategic treatment of clinical mastitis reduced intramammary antibiotic use by half and tended to decrease milk withholding time by 1 d, without significant differences in days to clinical cure, bacteriological cure risk, new intramammary infection risk, and treatment failure risk within 21 d after the clinical mastitis event.
Copyright © 2011 American Dairy Science Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21854917     DOI: 10.3168/jds.2010-4046

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dairy Sci        ISSN: 0022-0302            Impact factor:   4.034


  21 in total

Review 1.  Mastitis therapy and antimicrobial susceptibility: a multispecies review with a focus on antibiotic treatment of mastitis in dairy cattle.

Authors:  John Barlow
Journal:  J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia       Date:  2011-10-09       Impact factor: 2.673

2.  Molecular detection and sensitivity to antibiotics and bacteriocins of pathogens isolated from bovine mastitis in family dairy herds of central Mexico.

Authors:  Ma Fabiola León-Galván; José E Barboza-Corona; A Arianna Lechuga-Arana; Mauricio Valencia-Posadas; Daniel D Aguayo; Carlos Cedillo-Pelaez; Erika A Martínez-Ortega; Abner J Gutierrez-Chavez
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-03-01       Impact factor: 3.411

3.  Episodes of clinical mastitis and its relationship with duration of treatment and seasonality in crossbred cows maintained in organized dairy farm.

Authors:  Narender Kumar; A Manimaran; A Kumaresan; L Sreela; Tapas Kumar Patbandha; Shiwani Tiwari; Subhash Chandra
Journal:  Vet World       Date:  2016-01-21

4.  Evaluation of an On-Farm Culture System (Accumast) for Fast Identification of Milk Pathogens Associated with Clinical Mastitis in Dairy Cows.

Authors:  Erika Korzune Ganda; Rafael Sisconeto Bisinotto; Dean Harrison Decter; Rodrigo Carvalho Bicalho
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-05-13       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Mastitomics, the integrated omics of bovine milk in an experimental model of Streptococcus uberis mastitis: 1. High abundance proteins, acute phase proteins and peptidomics.

Authors:  Funmilola Clara Thomas; William Mullen; Riccardo Tassi; Adela Ramírez-Torres; Manikhandan Mudaliar; Tom N McNeilly; Ruth N Zadoks; Richard Burchmore; P David Eckersall
Journal:  Mol Biosyst       Date:  2016-08-16

6.  Longitudinal metagenomic profiling of bovine milk to assess the impact of intramammary treatment using a third-generation cephalosporin.

Authors:  Erika K Ganda; Rafael S Bisinotto; Svetlana F Lima; Kristina Kronauer; Dean H Decter; Georgios Oikonomou; Ynte H Schukken; Rodrigo C Bicalho
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-11-22       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Influence of clinical mastitis and its treatment outcome on reproductive performance in crossbred cows: A retrospective study.

Authors:  Narender Kumar; A Manimaran; M Sivaram; A Kumaresan; S Jeyakumar; L Sreela; P Mooventhan; D Rajendran
Journal:  Vet World       Date:  2017-05-07

8.  Bacteriological etiology and treatment of mastitis in Finnish dairy herds.

Authors:  Johanna Vakkamäki; Suvi Taponen; Anna-Maija Heikkilä; Satu Pyörälä
Journal:  Acta Vet Scand       Date:  2017-05-25       Impact factor: 1.695

9.  A Metataxonomic Approach Could Be Considered for Cattle Clinical Mastitis Diagnostics.

Authors:  Joanne W H Oultram; Erika K Ganda; Sarah C Boulding; Rodrigo C Bicalho; Georgios Oikonomou
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2017-03-10

10.  Factors affecting the cost-effectiveness of on-farm culture prior to the treatment of clinical mastitis in dairy cows.

Authors:  P M Down; A J Bradley; J E Breen; M J Green
Journal:  Prev Vet Med       Date:  2017-07-10       Impact factor: 2.670

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.