Literature DB >> 21854913

The effects of increased milking frequency during early lactation on milk yield and milk composition on commercial dairy farms.

F Soberon1, C M Ryan, D V Nydam, D M Galton, T R Overton.   

Abstract

Increased milking frequency (IMF) during early lactation has the potential for carryover responses following the return to normal herd milking frequency. The objective was to determine the consistency of response of cows in commercial dairy farms to IMF during early lactation. Cows (n=398) were assigned randomly at calving within each of the 4 participating farms to 1 of 2 treatments. The control group was milked twice-daily (2×) during the entire lactation. The IMF group was milked 4-times daily (4×) starting on d 1 to 7, depending on farm, until d 21 postcalving and 2× thereafter. Cows in the IMF group were milked at the beginning and again at the end of the normal milking routine. Milking intervals differed across the farms for the 4× cows with a minimum interval of 3.5, 4.0, 5.0, and 6h for each of the 4 farms, respectively. The milk yield of cows subjected to IMF increased by 2.2±0.4 kg/d during the first 7 mo of lactation. Interactions of treatment with lactation group (primiparous vs. multiparous) were not significant. Although percentages of fat and protein in milk were decreased by early lactation IMF (3.69%±0.03 fat and 3.05%±0.02 true protein for control vs. 3.57%±0.03 fat and 2.99% ± 0.02 true protein for IMF), overall yields of protein were increased by IMF (1.02±0.01 vs. 0.98±0.01 kg/d). Early lactation IMF did not affect udder health as assessed by somatic cell count linear score. Cows subjected to IMF were 1.4 times more likely classified as subclinically ketotic than the control cows. Early lactation IMF has the potential to increase milk yield on commercial dairy farms. Although the direction of response was the same on all farms, the magnitude of the response was different among farms and appears influenced by management practices specific to each farm, which included, but were not limited to, housing system, stocking density, nutrition, genetics, and other covariates differing among farms.
Copyright © 2011 American Dairy Science Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21854913     DOI: 10.3168/jds.2010-3640

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dairy Sci        ISSN: 0022-0302            Impact factor:   4.034


  4 in total

Review 1.  Triennial Lactation Symposium: A local affair: How the mammary gland adapts to changes in milking frequency.

Authors:  E H Wall; T B McFadden
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2011-12-28       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  The effects of incomplete milking and increased milking frequency on milk production rate and milk composition1.

Authors:  Jordan M Kuehnl; Meghan K Connelly; Alen Dzidic; Megan Lauber; Hannah P Fricker; Marisa Klister; Emma Olstad; Maria Balbach; Emily Timlin; Virginia Pszczolkowski; Peter M Crump; Doug J Reinemann; Laura L Hernandez
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-05-30       Impact factor: 3.159

Review 3.  Metabolic Disorders in the Transition Period Indicate that the Dairy Cows' Ability to Adapt is Overstressed.

Authors:  Albert Sundrum
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2015-10-09       Impact factor: 2.752

4.  The Effect of Compositional Changes Due to Seasonal Variation on Milk Density and the Determination of Season-Based Density Conversion Factors for Use in the Dairy Industry.

Authors:  Puneet Parmar; Nicolas Lopez-Villalobos; John T Tobin; Eoin Murphy; Arleen McDonagh; Shane V Crowley; Alan L Kelly; Laurence Shalloo
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2020-07-27
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.