OBJECTIVES: We examined the in vitro cellular effects of the multi-targeted receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) sunitinib and pazopanib on a series of human renal cell carcinoma (RCC) cell lines. METHODS: The human RCC cell lines 769-P, 786-O, HRC-24, HRC-31, HRC-45, HRC-78, SK-26B, and SK-45 were treated with varying concentrations of sunitinib and pazopanib. Cellular proliferation and cellular death were assessed using the CellTiter-Blue Cell Viability Assay and the TUNEL assay, respectively. Effective doses (ED) for inhibition of cellular proliferation or induction of apoptosis were calculated for sunitinib and pazopanib in each RCC cell line. RESULTS: Both sunitinib and pazopanib exhibited anti-proliferative activity to varying degree against all human RCC cell lines; however, sunitinib's effects were achieved at significantly lower concentrations. Moreover, sunitinib had a direct pro-apoptotic effect on all tested cell lines, while pazopanib failed to induce apoptosis in any of the examined human RCC cell lines even at maximal concentrations. CONCLUSIONS: Although sunitinib and pazopanib are often used interchangeably in the clinical setting, our results suggest that in-vitro biological activity of the two agents differs. Sunitinib exhibits a cytotoxic effect on RCC cell lines, while pazopanib's activity is solely cytostatic. These data may be clinically relevant given the current lack of comparative in-vivo studies between the two agents.
OBJECTIVES: We examined the in vitro cellular effects of the multi-targeted receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) sunitinib and pazopanib on a series of humanrenal cell carcinoma (RCC) cell lines. METHODS: The humanRCC cell lines 769-P, 786-O, HRC-24, HRC-31, HRC-45, HRC-78, SK-26B, and SK-45 were treated with varying concentrations of sunitinib and pazopanib. Cellular proliferation and cellular death were assessed using the CellTiter-Blue Cell Viability Assay and the TUNEL assay, respectively. Effective doses (ED) for inhibition of cellular proliferation or induction of apoptosis were calculated for sunitinib and pazopanib in each RCC cell line. RESULTS: Both sunitinib and pazopanib exhibited anti-proliferative activity to varying degree against all humanRCC cell lines; however, sunitinib's effects were achieved at significantly lower concentrations. Moreover, sunitinib had a direct pro-apoptotic effect on all tested cell lines, while pazopanib failed to induce apoptosis in any of the examined humanRCC cell lines even at maximal concentrations. CONCLUSIONS: Although sunitinib and pazopanib are often used interchangeably in the clinical setting, our results suggest that in-vitro biological activity of the two agents differs. Sunitinib exhibits a cytotoxic effect on RCC cell lines, while pazopanib's activity is solely cytostatic. These data may be clinically relevant given the current lack of comparative in-vivo studies between the two agents.
Authors: Robert J Motzer; Thomas E Hutson; Piotr Tomczak; M Dror Michaelson; Ronald M Bukowski; Olivier Rixe; Stéphane Oudard; Sylvie Negrier; Cezary Szczylik; Sindy T Kim; Isan Chen; Paul W Bycott; Charles M Baum; Robert A Figlin Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2007-01-11 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: John M Hollingsworth; David C Miller; Stephanie Daignault; Brent K Hollenbeck Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2006-09-20 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Thomas E Hutson; Ian D Davis; Jean-Pascal H Machiels; Paul L De Souza; Sylvie Rottey; Bao-Fa Hong; Richard J Epstein; Katherine L Baker; Lauren McCann; Theresa Crofts; Lini Pandite; Robert A Figlin Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2009-12-14 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: K K H Aben; T K Luth; M L G Janssen-Heijnen; P F Mulders; L A Kiemeney; D J van Spronsen Journal: Eur J Cancer Date: 2008-05-22 Impact factor: 9.162
Authors: Dan Huang; Yan Ding; Yan Li; Wang-Mei Luo; Zhong-Fa Zhang; John Snider; Kristin Vandenbeldt; Chao-Nan Qian; Bin Tean Teh Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2010-01-26 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Cora N Sternberg; Ian D Davis; Jozef Mardiak; Cezary Szczylik; Eunsik Lee; John Wagstaff; Carlos H Barrios; Pamela Salman; Oleg A Gladkov; Alexander Kavina; Juan J Zarbá; Mei Chen; Lauren McCann; Lini Pandite; Debasish F Roychowdhury; Robert E Hawkins Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2010-01-25 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Yaroslava Karpova; Chao Wu; Ali Divan; Mark E McDonnell; Elizabeth Hewlett; Peter Makhov; John Gordon; Min Ye; Allen B Reitz; Wayne E Childers; Tomasz Skorski; Vladimir Kolenko; Alexei V Tulin Journal: Biochem Pharmacol Date: 2019-03-15 Impact factor: 5.858
Authors: Sei Naito; Peter Makhov; Igor Astsaturov; Konstantin Golovine; Alexei Tulin; Alexander Kutikov; Robert G Uzzo; Vladimir M Kolenko Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2017-03-28 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Filipa Amaro; Carolina Pisoeiro; Maria João Valente; Maria de Lourdes Bastos; Paula Guedes de Pinho; Márcia Carvalho; Joana Pinto Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2022-08-31 Impact factor: 6.208
Authors: Peter Makhov; Ji A Sohn; Ilya G Serebriiskii; Rushaniya Fazliyeva; Vladimir Khazak; Yanis Boumber; Robert G Uzzo; Vladimir M Kolenko Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2020-09-24 Impact factor: 7.640