BACKGROUND: Candidate gene studies have been a key approach to the genetics of schizophrenia (SCZ). However, the results of these studies are confusing and no genes have been unequivocally implicated. The hypothesis-driven candidate gene literature can be appraised by comparison with the results of genome-wide association studies (GWAS). METHOD: We describe the characteristics of hypothesis-driven candidate gene studies from the SZGene database, and use pathway analysis to compare hypothesis-driven candidate genes with GWAS results from the International Schizophrenia Consortium (ISC). RESULTS: SZGene contained 732 autosomal genes evaluated in 1374 studies. These genes had poor statistical power to detect genetic effects typical for human diseases, assessed only 3.7% of genes in the genome, and had low marker densities per gene. Most genes were assessed once or twice (76.9%), providing minimal ability to evaluate consensus across studies. The ISC studies had 89% power to detect a genetic effect typical for common human diseases and assessed 79% of known autosomal common genetic variation. Pathway analyses did not reveal enrichment of smaller ISC p values in hypothesis-driven candidate genes, nor did a comprehensive evaluation of meta-hypotheses driving candidate gene selection (SCZ as a disease of the synapse or neurodevelopment). The most studied hypothesis-driven candidate genes (COMT, DRD3, DRD2, HTR2A, NRG1, BDNF, DTNBP1 and SLC6A4) had no notable ISC results. CONCLUSIONS: We did not find support for the idea that the hypothesis-driven candidate genes studied in the literature are enriched for the common genetic variation involved in the etiology of SCZ. Larger samples are required to evaluate this conclusion definitively.
BACKGROUND: Candidate gene studies have been a key approach to the genetics of schizophrenia (SCZ). However, the results of these studies are confusing and no genes have been unequivocally implicated. The hypothesis-driven candidate gene literature can be appraised by comparison with the results of genome-wide association studies (GWAS). METHOD: We describe the characteristics of hypothesis-driven candidate gene studies from the SZGene database, and use pathway analysis to compare hypothesis-driven candidate genes with GWAS results from the International Schizophrenia Consortium (ISC). RESULTS: SZGene contained 732 autosomal genes evaluated in 1374 studies. These genes had poor statistical power to detect genetic effects typical for human diseases, assessed only 3.7% of genes in the genome, and had low marker densities per gene. Most genes were assessed once or twice (76.9%), providing minimal ability to evaluate consensus across studies. The ISC studies had 89% power to detect a genetic effect typical for common human diseases and assessed 79% of known autosomal common genetic variation. Pathway analyses did not reveal enrichment of smaller ISC p values in hypothesis-driven candidate genes, nor did a comprehensive evaluation of meta-hypotheses driving candidate gene selection (SCZ as a disease of the synapse or neurodevelopment). The most studied hypothesis-driven candidate genes (COMT, DRD3, DRD2, HTR2A, NRG1, BDNF, DTNBP1 and SLC6A4) had no notable ISC results. CONCLUSIONS: We did not find support for the idea that the hypothesis-driven candidate genes studied in the literature are enriched for the common genetic variation involved in the etiology of SCZ. Larger samples are required to evaluate this conclusion definitively.
Authors: Thomas I Konneker; James J Crowley; Corey R Quackenbush; Richard S E Keefe; Diana O Perkins; T Scott Stroup; Jeffrey A Lieberman; Edwin van den Oord; Patrick F Sullivan Journal: Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet Date: 2010-07 Impact factor: 3.568
Authors: P F Sullivan; D Lin; J-Y Tzeng; E van den Oord; D Perkins; T S Stroup; M Wagner; S Lee; F A Wright; F Zou; W Liu; A M Downing; J Lieberman; S L Close Journal: Mol Psychiatry Date: 2008-03-18 Impact factor: 15.992
Authors: Lavinia Athanasiu; Morten Mattingsdal; Anna K Kähler; Andrew Brown; Omar Gustafsson; Ingrid Agartz; Ina Giegling; Pierandrea Muglia; Sven Cichon; Marcella Rietschel; Olli P H Pietiläinen; Leena Peltonen; Elvira Bramon; David Collier; David St Clair; Engilbert Sigurdsson; Hannes Petursson; Dan Rujescu; Ingrid Melle; Vidar M Steen; Srdjan Djurovic; Ole A Andreassen Journal: J Psychiatr Res Date: 2010-02-24 Impact factor: 4.791
Authors: Hreinn Stefansson; Roel A Ophoff; Stacy Steinberg; Ole A Andreassen; Sven Cichon; Dan Rujescu; Thomas Werge; Olli P H Pietiläinen; Ole Mors; Preben B Mortensen; Engilbert Sigurdsson; Omar Gustafsson; Mette Nyegaard; Annamari Tuulio-Henriksson; Andres Ingason; Thomas Hansen; Jaana Suvisaari; Jouko Lonnqvist; Tiina Paunio; Anders D Børglum; Annette Hartmann; Anders Fink-Jensen; Merete Nordentoft; David Hougaard; Bent Norgaard-Pedersen; Yvonne Böttcher; Jes Olesen; René Breuer; Hans-Jürgen Möller; Ina Giegling; Henrik B Rasmussen; Sally Timm; Manuel Mattheisen; István Bitter; János M Réthelyi; Brynja B Magnusdottir; Thordur Sigmundsson; Pall Olason; Gisli Masson; Jeffrey R Gulcher; Magnus Haraldsson; Ragnheidur Fossdal; Thorgeir E Thorgeirsson; Unnur Thorsteinsdottir; Mirella Ruggeri; Sarah Tosato; Barbara Franke; Eric Strengman; Lambertus A Kiemeney; Ingrid Melle; Srdjan Djurovic; Lilia Abramova; Vasily Kaleda; Julio Sanjuan; Rosa de Frutos; Elvira Bramon; Evangelos Vassos; Gillian Fraser; Ulrich Ettinger; Marco Picchioni; Nicholas Walker; Timi Toulopoulou; Anna C Need; Dongliang Ge; Joeng Lim Yoon; Kevin V Shianna; Nelson B Freimer; Rita M Cantor; Robin Murray; Augustine Kong; Vera Golimbet; Angel Carracedo; Celso Arango; Javier Costas; Erik G Jönsson; Lars Terenius; Ingrid Agartz; Hannes Petursson; Markus M Nöthen; Marcella Rietschel; Paul M Matthews; Pierandrea Muglia; Leena Peltonen; David St Clair; David B Goldstein; Kari Stefansson; David A Collier Journal: Nature Date: 2009-07-01 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Sagiv Shifman; Martina Johannesson; Michal Bronstein; Sam X Chen; David A Collier; Nicholas J Craddock; Kenneth S Kendler; Tao Li; Michael O'Donovan; F Anthony O'Neill; Michael J Owen; Dermot Walsh; Daniel R Weinberger; Cuie Sun; Jonathan Flint; Ariel Darvasi Journal: PLoS Genet Date: 2008-02 Impact factor: 5.917
Authors: Enda M Byrne; Andrew C Heath; Pamela A F Madden; Michele L Pergadia; Ian B Hickie; Grant W Montgomery; Nicholas G Martin; Naomi R Wray Journal: Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet Date: 2014-03-29 Impact factor: 3.568