Literature DB >> 21854486

Evidence-based community consultation for traumatic brain injury.

Catherine A Lynch1, Debra E Houry, Dajun Dai, David W Wright.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The objective was to determine if geospatial techniques can be used to inform targeted community consultation (CC) and public disclosure (PD) for a clinical trial requiring emergency exception from informed consent (EFIC).
METHODS: Data from January 2007 to December 2009 were extracted from a Level I trauma center's trauma database using the National Trauma Registry of the American College of Surgeon (NTRACS). Injury details, demographics, geographic codes, and clinical data necessary to match core elements of the clinical trial inclusion criteria (Glasgow Coma Scale [GCS] 3-12 and blunt head injury) were collected on all patients. Patients' home zip codes were geocoded to compare with population density and clustering analysis.
RESULTS: Over a 2-year period, 179 patients presented with moderate to severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). Mapping the rate and frequency of TBI patients presenting to the trauma center delineated at-risk populations for moderate to severe head injury. Four zip codes had higher incidences of TBI than the rest, with one zip code having a very high rate of 80 per 100,000 population.
CONCLUSIONS: Geospatial techniques and hospital data records can be used to characterize potential subjects and delineate a high-risk population to inform directed CC and public disclosure strategies.
© 2011 by the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21854486     DOI: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2011.01153.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Emerg Med        ISSN: 1069-6563            Impact factor:   3.451


  5 in total

1.  Variation of community consultation and public disclosure for a pediatric multi-centered "Exception from Informed Consent" trial.

Authors:  Maija Holsti; Roger Zemek; Jill Baren; Rachel M Stanley; Prashant Mahajan; Cheryl Vance; Kathleen M Brown; Victor Gonzalez; Denise King; Kammy Jacobsen; Kate Shreve; Katrina van de Bruinhorst; Anne Marie Jones; James M Chamberlain
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2014-11-04       Impact factor: 2.486

2.  Exception from informed consent for emergency research: consulting the trauma community.

Authors:  Carrie A Sims; Joshua A Isserman; Daniel Holena; Latha Mary Sundaram; Nikolai Tolstoy; Sarah Greer; Seema Sonnad; Jose Pascual; Patrick Reilly
Journal:  J Trauma Acute Care Surg       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 3.313

3.  Impact of individual clinical outcomes on trial participants' perspectives on enrollment in emergency research without consent.

Authors:  Louisa W Whitesides; Jill M Baren; Michelle H Biros; Ross J Fleischman; Prasanthi R Govindarajan; Elizabeth B Jones; Arthur M Pancioli; Rebecca D Pentz; Victoria M Scicluna; David W Wright; Neal W Dickert
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2016-11-15       Impact factor: 2.486

Review 4.  Meeting unique requirements: Community consultation and public disclosure for research in emergency setting using exception from informed consent.

Authors:  Neal W Dickert; Kathleen Metz; Michael D Fetters; Adrianne N Haggins; Deneil K Harney; Candace D Speight; Robert Silbergleit
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 5.221

Review 5.  Exceptions to the rule of informed consent for research with an intervention.

Authors:  Susanne Rebers; Neil K Aaronson; Flora E van Leeuwen; Marjanka K Schmidt
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2016-02-06       Impact factor: 2.652

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.