Literature DB >> 21854439

Prevalence of abnormal echocardiographic findings in cancer patients: a retrospective evaluation of echocardiography for identifying cardiac abnormalities in cancer patients.

Iyad N Daher1, Christopher Kim, Ramy R Saleh, Juan Carlos Plana, Syed Wamique Yusuf, Jose Banchs.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) is commonly used to assess cardiac morphology and function in cancer patients. The nature, distribution, and prevalence of significant echocardiographic abnormalities are unknown. We hypothesized that TTEs performed for cancer or cancer treatment indications, have a high prevalence of significant abnormalities (SA), including a large proportion of findings that may be overlooked by other imaging modalities.
METHODS: All TTE studies performed in a tertiary cancer center over a six-month period, from January to June 2007, were reviewed. The TTEs were divided into studies performed for a cardiovascular indication (CV) and those done for a cancer-related indication (CA). Reports were classified as normal, mildly abnormal, and significantly abnormal (SA) based on findings. Abnormal findings' distributions were compared between indication groups.
RESULTS: Three thousand nine hundred and twenty-four TTEs were performed and divided into either group CV (61.2%) or group CA (38.7%). The most common indication in the CV group was valvular diseases (29.9%). In the CA group, the majority of TTE were requested for evaluation during or after chemotherapy or radiation (94.7%). Around 41.9% of studies in group CV were classified as SA whereas 19.9% (P < 0.001) in the CA group were classified as such. The relative distributions of individual SA findings were compared between the indication groups and were not statistically different.
CONCLUSIONS: One in five patients who had TTE studies for CA were found to have SA, and 81.5% of these may not have been found with other modalities. The TTE allows safe diagnosis of a wide range of abnormal findings that may be overlooked if alternative but less versatile modalities are used.
© 2011, Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21854439     DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8175.2011.01490.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Echocardiography        ISSN: 0742-2822            Impact factor:   1.724


  3 in total

1.  Expert consensus for multimodality imaging evaluation of adult patients during and after cancer therapy: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging.

Authors:  Juan Carlos Plana; Maurizio Galderisi; Ana Barac; Michael S Ewer; Bonnie Ky; Marielle Scherrer-Crosbie; Javier Ganame; Igal A Sebag; Deborah A Agler; Luigi P Badano; Jose Banchs; Daniela Cardinale; Joseph Carver; Manuel Cerqueira; Jeanne M DeCara; Thor Edvardsen; Scott D Flamm; Thomas Force; Brian P Griffin; Guy Jerusalem; Jennifer E Liu; Andreia Magalhães; Thomas Marwick; Liza Y Sanchez; Rosa Sicari; Hector R Villarraga; Patrizio Lancellotti
Journal:  Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 6.875

2.  Basic cardiovascular risk assessment in naïve patients with colon cancer.

Authors:  Liliana Radulescu; Lucretia Avram; Elena Buzdugan; Dana Crisan; Alin Grosu; Cristiana Grapa; Laurentiu Stoicescu; Valer Donca; Sorin Crisan; Valentin Militaru; Anca Buzoianu; Dan Radulescu
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2022-03-09       Impact factor: 2.447

Review 3.  Practical guidance for echocardiography for cancer therapeutics-related cardiac dysfunction.

Authors:  Tetsuari Onishi; Yuko Fukuda; Sakiko Miyazaki; Hirotsugu Yamada; Hidekazu Tanaka; Jiro Sakamoto; Masao Daimon; Chisato Izumi; Akiko Nonaka; Satoshi Nakatani; Makoto Akaishi
Journal:  J Echocardiogr       Date:  2020-11-07
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.