Literature DB >> 21854271

Is monogamy or committed relationship status a marker for low sexual risk among men in substance abuse treatment? Clinical and methodological considerations.

Donald A Calsyn1, Aimee N Campbell, Susan Tross, Mary A Hatch-Maillette.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: HIV prevention interventions often promote monogamy to reduce sexual risk. However, there is little consensus about how to define monogamy.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the extent to which recent monogamy and/or being in a committed relationship serve as markers for low sexual risk among men in substance abuse treatment.
METHODS: Participants were 360 men enrolled in the National Institute on Drug Abuse Clinical Trials Network "Real Men Are Safe" protocol who completed all assessments (baseline, 3 months, and 6 months). Self-reported behaviors included number of sexual partners, type of relationships, frequency of vaginal/anal intercourse, and percentage of condom use.
RESULTS: The rate of self-reported monogamy in the prior 90 days was stable across assessments (54.2%, 53.1%, 58.3%). However, at each assessment 7.5-10% of monogamous men identified their partner as a casual partner, and only 123 (34.2%) reported being monogamous at every assessment. Of these, 20 (5.6%) reported being monogamous with different partners across assessments. Men with both committed relationship and casual partners reported more condom use with their committed relationship partners than men with only a committed relationship partner.
CONCLUSION: Clinicians and researchers should consider individual relationship context and behavior and avoid assuming that recent monogamy or being in a committed relationship denotes low risk. SCIENTIFIC SIGNIFICANCE: This study provides evidence that, in male drug users, monogamy does not necessarily reflect low sexual risk. Rather, "monogamous" men actually encompass various combinations of partner types and levels of risk behavior that are unstable, even over brief time periods. Clinicians and researchers must take these variations into account.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21854271      PMCID: PMC3238678          DOI: 10.3109/00952990.2011.596874

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse        ISSN: 0095-2990            Impact factor:   3.829


  42 in total

1.  Predictors of increased condom use following HIV intervention with heterosexually active drug users.

Authors:  C F Kwiatkowski; D R Stober; R E Booth; Y Zhang
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  1999-03-01       Impact factor: 4.492

2.  Sexual risk behavior changes among HIV+ and HIV-female injecting drug users over 4 years.

Authors:  C Dolezal; A A Ehrhardt; H F Meyer-Bahlburg; X Liu; T M Exner; J G Rabkin; J M Gorman; K Marder; Y Stern
Journal:  Women Health       Date:  1998

3.  HIV knowledge, beliefs and sexual behavior of male heterosexual drug users and non-drug users attending an HIV testing clinic in Israel.

Authors:  V Soskolne; S Maayan
Journal:  Isr J Psychiatry Relat Sci       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 0.481

4.  Sex, drugs and HIV counseling and testing: a prospective study of behavior-change among methadone-maintenance clients in New England.

Authors:  R J MacGowan; R M Brackbill; D L Rugg; N M Swanson; B Weinstein; A Couchon; J Scibak; S Molde; P McLaughlin; T Barker; R Voigt
Journal:  AIDS       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 4.177

5.  Longitudinal changes in sexual risk behavior among HIV+ and HIV- male injecting drug users.

Authors:  C Dolezal; H F Meyer-Bahlburg; X Liu; A A Ehrhardt; T M Exner; J G Rabkin; J M Gorman; K Marder; Y Stern
Journal:  Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 3.829

6.  Behavioral risk for HIV infection among adults with a severe and persistent mental illness: patterns and psychological antecedents.

Authors:  M P Carey; K B Carey; L S Weinhardt; C M Gordon
Journal:  Community Ment Health J       Date:  1997-04

7.  A bridge too near? Injecting drug users' sexual behaviour.

Authors:  C McDonald; W Loxley; A Marsh
Journal:  AIDS Care       Date:  1994

8.  What is the significance of black-white differences in risky sexual behavior?

Authors:  E H Johnson; L A Jackson; Y Hinkle; D Gilbert; T Hoopwood; C M Lollis; C Willis; L Gant
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 1.798

9.  Condom use rates for specific sexual behaviors among opioid abusers entering treatment.

Authors:  V L King; R K Brooner; G E Bigelow; C W Schmidt; L J Felch; P M Gazaway
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 4.492

10.  Prevalence and detection of HIV risk behavior in primary care: implications for clinical preventive services.

Authors:  J Ward; R Sanson-Fisher
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  1995 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.043

View more
  4 in total

1.  Differential risk factors for HIV drug and sex risk-taking among non-treatment-seeking hospitalized injection drug users.

Authors:  Denise Crooks; Judith Tsui; Bradley Anderson; Shernaz Dossabhoy; Debra Herman; Jane M Liebschutz; Michael D Stein
Journal:  AIDS Behav       Date:  2015-03

2.  The design and analysis of multisite effectiveness trials: a decade of progress in the National Drug Abuse Clinical Trials Network.

Authors:  Edward V Nunes
Journal:  Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 3.829

3.  Attachment orientation and sexual risk behaviour among young Black gay and bisexual men.

Authors:  Stephanie H Cook; Daphne C Watkins; Benjamin Calebs; Patrick A Wilson
Journal:  Psychol Sex       Date:  2016-04-04

4.  Examining the correspondence between relationship identity and actual sexual risk behavior among HIV-positive men who have sex with men.

Authors:  Aaron J Blashill; Johannes M Wilson; Conall M O'Cleirigh; Kenneth H Mayer; Steven A Safren
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2014-01
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.