BACKGROUND: Self-reported commitment to change (CTC) could be a potentially valuable method to address the need for continuing medical education (CME) to demonstrate clinical outcomes. AIM: This study determines: (1) are clinicians who make CTCs more likely to report changes in their medical practices and (2) do these changes persist over time? METHODS: Intervention participants (N = 80) selected up to three commitments from a predefined list following the lecture, while control participants (N = 64) generated up to three commitments at 7 days post-lecture. At 7 and 30 days post-lecture, participants were queried if any practice change occurred as a result of attending the lecture. RESULTS: About 91% of the intervention group reported practice changes consistent with their commitments at 7 days. Only 32% in the control group reported changes (z = 7.32, p < 0.001). At 30 days, more participants in the intervention group relative to the control group reported change (58% vs. 22%, z = 3.74, p < 0.01). Once a participant from either group made a commitment, there were no differences in reported changes (63% vs. 67%, z = <0.00, p = 0.38). CONCLUSION: Integration of CTC is an effective method of reinforcing learning and measuring outcomes.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Self-reported commitment to change (CTC) could be a potentially valuable method to address the need for continuing medical education (CME) to demonstrate clinical outcomes. AIM: This study determines: (1) are clinicians who make CTCs more likely to report changes in their medical practices and (2) do these changes persist over time? METHODS: Intervention participants (N = 80) selected up to three commitments from a predefined list following the lecture, while control participants (N = 64) generated up to three commitments at 7 days post-lecture. At 7 and 30 days post-lecture, participants were queried if any practice change occurred as a result of attending the lecture. RESULTS: About 91% of the intervention group reported practice changes consistent with their commitments at 7 days. Only 32% in the control group reported changes (z = 7.32, p < 0.001). At 30 days, more participants in the intervention group relative to the control group reported change (58% vs. 22%, z = 3.74, p < 0.01). Once a participant from either group made a commitment, there were no differences in reported changes (63% vs. 67%, z = <0.00, p = 0.38). CONCLUSION: Integration of CTC is an effective method of reinforcing learning and measuring outcomes.
Authors: Linda H A Bos-Bonnie; Jan E A M van Bergen; Ellen Te Pas; Michael A Kijser; Nynke van Dijk Journal: BMC Fam Pract Date: 2017-04-24 Impact factor: 2.497
Authors: Jennita G Meinema; Joke A Haafkens; Debbie A D C Jaarsma; Henk C P M van Weert; Nynke van Dijk Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-06-08 Impact factor: 3.240