Literature DB >> 21854130

Congenital atlantoaxial dislocation: a dynamic process and role of facets in irreducibility.

Pravin Salunke1, Manish Sharma, Harsimrat Bir Singh Sodhi, Kanchan K Mukherjee, Niranjan K Khandelwal.   

Abstract

OBJECT: Patient age at presentation with congenital atlantoaxial dislocation (CAAD) is variable. In addition, the factors determining irreducibility or reducibility in these patients remain unclear. The facets appear to contribute to the stability of the joint, albeit to an unknown extent. The objective of this paper was to study the characteristics of C1-2 facets in these patients and their bearing on the clinicoradiological presentation and management.
METHODS: Twenty-four patients with CAAD were studied. Fifteen patients had irreducible CAAD (IrAAD); 3 of these patients experienced incomplete reduction after traction, and 9 had reducible CAAD (RAAD). The images (CT scans of the craniovertebral junction in a neutral position) obtained in the parasagittal, axial, and coronal planes were studied with respect to the C1-2 facets and were compared with 32 control scans. The inferior sagittal and coronal C-1 facet angles were measured. The lordosis of the cervical spine (cervical spine angle calculated on radiographs of the cervical spine, neutral view) in these patients was compared with normal. The management of these patients is described.
RESULTS: The inferior sagittal C-1 facet angle and at least one coronal angle in patients with IrAAD were significantly acute compared with those in patients with RAAD and the control population. A significant correlation was found between age and the acuteness of the inferior sagittal C-1 facet angle (that is, the more acute the angle, the earlier the presentation). The lordosis of the cervical spine was exaggerated in patients with IrAAD. Three patients with IrAAD who had smaller acute angles experienced a partial reduction after traction and a complete reduction after intraoperative distraction of the facets, thereby avoiding a transoral procedure. An inferior sagittal C-1 facet angle of more than 150° in the sagittal plane predicted reducibility. Drilling a wedge off the facet in the sagittal plane to make the inferior sagittal C-1 facet angle 150° can reduce the C1-2 joint intraoperatively by posterior approach alone.
CONCLUSIONS: The acuteness of the inferior C-1 sagittal facet angles possibly determines the age at presentation and reducibility. The coronal angles determine the telescoping of C-2 within C-1. Patients with IrAAD can be treated using a posterior approach alone with the exception of those with extremely acute angles or a retroflexed dens. The exaggerated lordosis of the cervical spine in these patients is a compensatory phenomenon.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21854130     DOI: 10.3171/2011.7.SPINE1152

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine        ISSN: 1547-5646


  22 in total

Review 1.  Videoassisted anterior surgical approaches to the craniocervical junction: rationale and clinical results.

Authors:  Massimiliano Visocchi; Alberto Di Martino; Rosario Maugeri; Ivón González Valcárcel; Vincenzo Grasso; Gaetano Paludetti
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-03-24       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  'Atlas shrugged': congenital lateral angular irreducible atlantoaxial dislocation: a case series of complex variant and its management.

Authors:  Pravin Salunke; Sushanta K Sahoo; Sameer Futane; A N Deepak; N K Khandelwal
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-01-13       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  The changes of syrinx volume after posterior reduction and fixation of basilar invagination and atlantoaxial dislocation with syringomyelia.

Authors:  Zuowei Wang; Xingwen Wang; Fengzeng Jian; Can Zhang; Hao Wu; Zan Chen
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-08-23       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Classification of the facets of lateral atlantoaxial joints in patients with congenital atlantoaxial dislocation.

Authors:  Fei Ma; Hongchun He; Yehui Liao; Qiang Tang; Chao Tang; Sheng Yang; Qing Wang; Dejun Zhong
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2020-07-30       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Is anterior release and cervical traction necessary for the treatment of irreducible atlantoaxial dislocation? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jian Guan; Zan Chen; Hao Wu; Qingyu Yao; Can Zhang; Tengfei Qi; Kai Wang; Wanru Duan; Jun Gao; Yongning Li; Fengzeng Jian
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  C1 lateral mass reduction screws for treating atlantoaxial dislocations: Bringing ease by modification.

Authors:  Deepak Kumar Singh; Vipul Pathak; Neha Singh; Rakesh Kumar Singh; Mohammad Kaif; Kuldeep Yadav
Journal:  J Craniovertebr Junction Spine       Date:  2022-06-13

7.  'Pseudofacets' or 'supernumerary facets' in congenital atlanto-axial dislocation: boon or bane?

Authors:  Pravin Salunke; Sameer Futane; Manish Sharma; Sushant Sahoo; Udaybhanu Kovilapu; N K Khandelwal
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-07-30       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 8.  Atlantoaxial dislocation due to os odontoideum in patients with Down's syndrome: literature review and case reports.

Authors:  Olga M Sergeenko; Konstantin A Dyachkov; Sergey O Ryabykh; Alexander V Burtsev; Alexander V Gubin
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2019-11-03       Impact factor: 1.475

9.  Bilateral inverted vertebral arteries (V3 segment) in a case of congenital atlantoaxial dislocation: Distinct entity or a lateral variant of persistent first intersegmental artery?

Authors:  Pravin Salunke; Sushanta K Sahoo; Mandeep S Ghuman
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2014-05-31

10.  Redundant anomalous vertebral artery in a case of congenital irreducible atlantoaxial dislocation: Emphasizing on the differences from the first intersegemental artery and operative steps to prevent injury while performing C1-2 joint manipulation.

Authors:  Devi P Patra; Pravin S Salunke; Sushanta K Sahoo; Mandeep S Ghuman
Journal:  Ann Neurosci       Date:  2015-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.