Literature DB >> 21853542

Cancer epidemiology in Central, South and Eastern European countries.

Eduard Vrdoljak1, Marek Z Wojtukiewicz, Tadeusz Pienkowski, Gyorgy Bodoky, Peter Berzinec, Jindrich Finek, Vladimir Todorović, Nenad Borojević, Adina Croitoru.   

Abstract

AIM: To collect cancer epidemiology data in South Eastern European countries as a basis for potential comparison of their performance in cancer care.
METHODS: The South Eastern European Research Oncology Group (SEEROG) collected and analyzed epidemiological data on incidence and mortality that reflect cancer management in 8 countries - Croatia, Czech Republic, Hungary, Romania, Poland, Slovakia, and Serbia and Montenegro in the last 20-40 years.
RESULTS: The most common cancer type in men in all countries was lung cancer, followed by colorectal and prostate cancer, with the exception of the Czech Republic, where prostate cancer and colorectal cancer were more common. The most frequent cancer in women was breast cancer followed by colorectal cancer, with the exceptions of Romania and Central Serbia where cervical cancer was the second most common. Cancer mortality data from the last 20-40 years revealed two different patterns in men. In Romania and in Serbia and Montenegro, there was a trend toward an increase, while in the other countries mortality was declining, after increasing for a number of years. In women, a steady decline was observed over many years in the Czech Republic, Hungary, and Slovakia, while in the other countries it remained unchanged.
CONCLUSIONS: There are striking variations in the risk of different cancers by geographic area. Most of the international variation is due to exposure to known or suspected risk factors which provides a clear challenge to prevention. There are some differences in incidence and mortality that cannot be explained by exposure to known risk factors or treatment availabilities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21853542      PMCID: PMC3160694          DOI: 10.3325/cmj.2011.52.478

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Croat Med J        ISSN: 0353-9504            Impact factor:   1.351


On a global scale, cancer has become a major public health problem and an increasingly important contributor to the burden of disease. Based on the most recent available international data, there were an estimated 12.7 million new cancer cases, 7.6 million deaths from cancer, and 28 million persons alive with cancer within five years from the initial diagnosis (1-3). The most common cancers in the world were lung (1.61 million cases), breast (1.38 million), and colorectal cancer (1.24 million) (3). Because of its poor prognosis, lung cancer was also the most common cause of death (1.38 million), followed by gastric (737 000 deaths), and liver cancer (695 000 deaths) (1-4). Priority setting for cancer control and cancer services in any region needs to be based on knowledge of the cancer burden and the local mix of predominant cancer types (5). According to estimates of global cancer burden made by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), the incidence and mortality rates from many specific types of cancer and all cancers combined vary widely by geographic locality (6). Moreover, the IARC also estimated that over half of newly diagnosed cases and two-thirds of cancer deaths occur in low and medium-income countries (6). There are striking variations in the pattern of cancer by site from region to region (7). The large differences in incidence and mortality in different countries may reflect a combination of differences in prevalence of underlying risk factors, differences in host susceptibility, and/or variations in cancer detection, reporting, classification systems, treatment, and follow-up. Among European countries, wide differences in the quality of cancer care are observed, especially when comparison is made between “old” and “new” EU members or between developed and developing countries (8). Cancer survival is significantly lower in Eastern European countries, including the new Member States, than in the EU 15 (9-12). Transitional countries and middle income countries are frequently left forgotten “in between” and the cancer problem in these countries is among the worst and fastest growing (8). In this report, we provide an analysis, which we propose as a foundation for detailed evaluation of cancer care in selected Central, Southern and Eastern European countries, represented by members of the South Eastern European Research Oncology Group (SEEROG). Our epidemiological analysis indicates the scale of the problem of oncological care in individual countries and shows current trends in the incidence of particular cancers. Comparison of status of oncology between countries in Eastern, Southern, and Central European region has never been undertaken before and key barriers to deliver appropriate quality of care have not previously been identified.

Material and methods

The methods used to compute the estimates for major cancers are described in detail in GLOBOCAN (1). The basic data used are the best available information on incidence and mortality in selected SEEROG countries. We estimated the incidence and mortality rates for selected Southern and Eastern European countries by sex and cancer site, for four age groups (0-19, 20-44, 45-64, 65+ years) using the most recent data. The countries included in the analysis were Croatia, Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, Romania, Slovakia, and Serbia and Montenegro. Estimates of the resident population of individual countries for the years 2002 to 2006, generally based on official censuses, were obtained from the World Health Organization (WHO) database. Age-standardized incidence and mortality rates per 100 000 populations were calculated. From the matrices of certified deaths and resident population numbers, incidence and mortality rates were calculated for specific age groups (0-19, 20-44, 45-64, 65+ years) and time periods. The world standard population was used for calculations (13). Historical data on cancer mortality rates covered the period from the early 1960s to the first decade of the 21st century. The time frame for the individual countries was: Croatia 1985-2006; Czech Republic 1970-2005; Hungary 1965-2005; Poland 1965-2006; Romania 1969-2004; Serbia and Montenegro 1997-2002 (although Serbia and Montenegro are now two independent countries, we present results for both countries together as over this period they were one state); and Slovakia 1971-2005. The data for specific tumor sites were abstracted from WHO database, including the number of deaths by sex and 5-year age groups according to cancer site in the relevant years (14). Mortality data were collected for all cancers and for selected cancer sites by searching for the following International Classification of Diseases version 10 (ICD-10) codes: cancer general (C00-C97), stomach (C16), colorectal (C18-C21), lung (C33-C34), breast (C50), uterine cervix (C53), ovary (C56), prostate (C61), kidney (C64), and urinary bladder (C67). For long-term observations, the source data were re-coded into ICD-10 according to the recommendations of the ICD and WHO committee (15). Sources of data on incidence are much more disparate. Attempts were made to collect data for the whole of each country. The sources of data and time frames were as follows: 1. Croatia: Croatian National Cancer Registry, Croatian National Institute of Public Health, Zagreb; 1993-2006 (16); 2. The Czech Republic: Czech National Cancer Registry; 1977-2005 (17); 3. Hungary: Globocan 2002 (process of creating national cancer register has been started but it ended with project phase) (1); 4. Poland: National Cancer Register; 1980-2006 (18); 5. Romania: Globocan 2002 (there are some local registers; however, these registers significantly underestimated incidence; until 2007, registration was at the hospital and clinic level and there were no national institution collecting data) (1). 6. Serbia: Cancer Registry of Central Serbia, Institute of Public Health of the Republic of Serbia (75% of Serbian population) 2002-2004 (19). 7. Montenegro: there is no reliable source of data on cancer incidence in Montenegro as a whole, but the data were derived from cancer registries covering a part of the country (19). 8. Slovakia: National Cancer Registry, Cancer Research Institute SAS, Bratislava; 1978-2003 (20).

Results

The analysis covered a total population of 98 million people in all the participating countries. The population sizes of the chosen countries ranged from 4.5 million in Croatia to 38 million in Poland (Table 1).
Table 1

Population characteristics of the selected countries: Croatia, Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, Romania, Serbia and Montenegro, and Slovakia

CountryYear of data collectionPopulation (in thousands)
malefemaletotal
Croatia
2005
2138.6
2303.3
4441.9
Czech Republic
2005
4991.4
5242.7
10 234.1
Hungary
2005
4788.8
5298.2
10 087.1
Poland
2006
18 436.1
19 696.2
38 132.3
Romania
2004
10 571.6
11 101.7
21 673.3
Serbia and Montenegro
2002
3947.1
4161.5
8108.7
Slovakia20052615.92773.35389.2
Population characteristics of the selected countries: Croatia, Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, Romania, Serbia and Montenegro, and Slovakia

Incidence

There were almost 360 000 newly diagnosed cancer patients per year in the study region. The greatest number based on the size of populations was found in Poland (n=126 019) and Croatia (n=20 186) (Table 2).
Table 2

Age-standardized incidence rates for all cancers by sex and country – Croatia, Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, Romania, Central Serbia, and Slovakia (last available year)

CountryYear of data collectionMale
Female
n0-1920-4445-6465+all agesn0-1920-4445-6465+all ages
Croatia
2005
11 030
19.1
71.1
655.4
2255.2
314.2
9156
16.3
94.2
506.4
1078.8
210.3
Czech Republic
2005
28 147
12.7
64.4
761.5
2676.7
359.0
26 627
12.0
170.4
647.0
1439.1
286.4
Hungary
2002
26 278
11.5
78.7
916.1
2504.9
386.8
22 924
9.1
93.8
582.9
1381.7
250.6
Poland
2006
64 092
13.8
46.0
553.3
1818.5
253.6
61 927
12.1
76.6
506.5
923.1
191.8
Romania
2002
32 244
12.3
53.9
544.9
1226.1
216.4
27 655
9.9
84.0
397.3
696.2
163.4
Central Serbia
2004
12 801
21.7
84.3
692.8
1674.7
286.2
11 954
17.1
134.4
640.4
1036.5
246.7
Slovakia200312 15916.973.2807.42662.5371.411 84112.595.9627.51443.4257.9
Age-standardized incidence rates for all cancers by sex and country – Croatia, Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, Romania, Central Serbia, and Slovakia (last available year) Detailed analysis by age showed that in children (0-19 years) the highest cancer incidence was observed in Central Serbia (21.7/100 000 for boys and 17.1/100 000 for girls) and Croatia (19.1/100 000 and 16.3/100 000, respectively). The lowest incidences were recorded in Hungary (11.5/100 000 and 9.1/100 000, respectively) and Romania (12.3/100 000 and 9.9/100 000, respectively). In this age group, cancer was diagnosed more frequently in boys than in girls, by approximately 20% (Table 2). Cancer incidence in young adults (20-44 years) was significantly higher in women than in men in most countries. Incidence rates in women were between 76.6/100 000 in Poland and 170.4/100 000 in Czech Republic, which is a much greater difference than between the rates in men in that age group. The incidence in men was highest in Central Serbia (84.3/100 000) and lowest in Poland (46.0/100 000) (Table 2). In the middle-aged population (45-64 years), cancer incidence was about 30% higher in men than in women. The highest incidence in men was found in Hungary (916.1/100 000) and the lowest in Poland (553.3/100 000) and Romania (544.9/100 000). The highest cancer incidence in women in this age group was in the Czech Republic, Central Serbia, and Slovakia (≥627.5/100 000). The lowest incidence was estimated for Romania (397.3/100 000) (Table 2). In the elderly population (≥65 years), cancer was diagnosed almost twice as often in men as in women. The highest incidence in older men was found in the Czech Republic (2676.7/100 000) and Slovakia (2662.5/100 000) and the lowest in Romania (1226.1/100 000). The pattern of cancer incidence in older women was the same as in older men: the highest in Slovakia (1443.4/100 000) and the Czech Republic (1439.1/100 000), and the lowest in Poland (923.1/100 000) and Romania (696.2/100 000) (Table 2). Table 3 shows age-standardized incidence rates for the selected most common cancer sites.
Table 3

Age-standardized incidence rates for selected cancers (available year) by country Croatia, Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, Romania, Serbia and Montenegro, and Slovakia

CountryYear of data collectionMale
Female
lungstomachlarge bowelprostatekidneyurinary bladderlungstomachlarge bowelbreastcervixovarykidneyurinary bladder
Croatia
2005
63.7
17.7
43.5
38.7
11.1
18.4
13.6
6.9
23.4
55.8
9.2
11.7
4.7
4.1
Czech Republic
2005
58.2
11.2
58.7
59.5
22.6
22.3
15.5
5.8
28.8
61.7
13.3
12.4
9.8
6.0
Hungary
2002
94.6
20.5
56.6
34.0
14.7
19.6
24.9
9.5
33.7
63.0
15.7
11.1
6.6
5.1
Poland
2006
60.2
12.8
29.3
27.3
9.1
15.9
14.5
4.9
17.2
44.5
11.5
11.1
4.7
3.0
Romania
2002
50.0
17.6
22.0
16.8
5.5
15.4
8.5
6.8
14.4
44.3
23.9
9.4
2.8
3.3
Central Serbia
2004
64.2
12.9
33.7
20.1
6.5
17.4
18.4
7.2
20.9
57.9
24.3
10.9
3.8
4.2
Slovakia200455.816.155.533.914.915.910.47.027.749.715.211.56.64.1
Age-standardized incidence rates for selected cancers (available year) by country Croatia, Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, Romania, Serbia and Montenegro, and Slovakia Lung cancer was the most common cancer in men in all studied countries, with the exception of the Czech Republic, where prostate cancer and colorectal cancer were more common. The second most frequent cause of cancer morbidity was colorectal cancer followed by prostate cancer, which was ranked third in most countries, with the highest proportion in the Czech Republic and the lowest proportion in Central Serbia. The incidence of kidney cancer ranged from ~ 2% in most countries to 6.3% in the Czech Republic. The latter is a special case, with a kidney cancer incidence 2-4 times higher than other countries in the region. The most frequent cancer in women was breast cancer, with the highest incidence in Romania and the lowest in Slovakia. The second most common tumor was colorectal cancer. An exception was Romania, where cervical cancer was the second most common cancer in women. In the third place, there was lung cancer (Croatia, Hungary, Poland, and Central Serbia), uterine cancer (Czech Republic, Slovakia), or colorectal cancer (Romania). Kidney cancer was responsible for 2-4% of the cancer incidence (highest in the Czech Republic). Figure 1 gives an overview of cancer incidence by site, sex, and country.
Figure 1

Overview of cancer incidence by site and sex for selected countries – Croatia, Hungary, Romania, Central Serbia, Poland, and Slovakia.

Overview of cancer incidence by site and sex for selected countries – Croatia, Hungary, Romania, Central Serbia, Poland, and Slovakia.

Mortality

The greatest number of cancer deaths was observed in Poland (91 632), which had the biggest population of the studied countries and the fewest cancer deaths occurred in Slovakia (n=11 794) and Croatia (n=12 639), attributed to the smaller size of the populations (Table 4).
Table 4

Cancer mortality compared to total mortality by country – Croatia, Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, Romania, Serbia and Montenegro, and Slovakia

CountryYear of data collectionPopulation (in thousands)
Number of total deaths
All cancer deaths
Frequency of cancer deaths (%)
malefemaletotalmalefemaletotalmalefemaletotalmalefemaletotal
Croatia
2005
2138.6
2303.3
4441.9
26 058
25 720
51 778
7430
5209
12 639
29
20
24
Czech Republic
2005
4991.4
5242.7
10 234.1
54 072
53 866
107 938
15 567
12 466
28 033
29
23
26
Hungary
2005
4788.8
5298.2
10 087.1
69 773
65 950
135 723
17 134
13 481
30 615
25
20
23
Poland
2006
18 436.1
19 696.2
38 132.3
198 298
171 388
369 686
51 777
39 855
91 632
26
23
25
Romania
2004
10 571.6
11 101.7
21 673.3
138 440
120 450
258 890
25 641
18 037
43 678
19
15
17
Serbia and Montenegro
2002
3947.1
4161.5
8108.7
111 108
105 350
216 458
11 216
8330
19 546
10
8
9
Slovakia20052615.92773.35 389.228 15125 32453 4756906488811 794251922
Cancer mortality compared to total mortality by country – Croatia, Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, Romania, Serbia and Montenegro, and Slovakia The proportion of deaths attributable to cancer was highest for men in Croatia and the Czech Republic (29%), while in Poland and Hungary about a quarter of deaths were caused by cancer. The highest proportion of cancer deaths in women was found in Poland and the Czech Republic (23%), while in other countries (except Romania, and Serbia and Montenegro) cancer deaths constituted a fifth of all deaths (Table 4). Table 5 presents cancer mortality data by age group. In the 0-19 years age group, the highest cancer mortality in boys was found in Romania (6.5/100 000) and Serbia and Montenegro (5.6/100 000) and in girls in Romania (4.8/100 000). The lowest cancer mortality in this age group was recorded in the Czech Republic and Hungary (2.2-3.4/100 000). In the 20-44 years age group, the highest cancer mortality in men was observed in Hungary (30.8/100 000) and Romania (28.1/100 000). Women had the highest cancer mortality in Romania (30.9/100 000), Serbia and Montenegro (29.2/100000), and Hungary (28.9/100000). In the other countries, the cancer mortality rates were similar and about 50% lower. In this age group, cancer mortality rates in women were equal to or higher than rates in men. Significantly higher cancer mortality rates in men aged 45-64 years were observed in Hungary, with the rate of 563.8/100 000 being 30%-50% higher than in other countries. Similarly in the female population, mortality was highest in Hungary (275.0/100 000) and lowest in Romania (210.7/100 000) and Croatia (197.6/100 000). Cancer mortality in elderly men (≥65 years) was similar in Croatia, the Czech Republic, Poland, and Slovakia (1550-1675/100 000). Cancer mortality was about 30%-35% lower ( ~ 1100/100 000) in Romania and Serbia and Montenegro. In women, a similar pattern was observed, with the lowest mortality in Serbia and Montenegro and Romania.
Table 5

Standardized mortality rates from all cancers in selected countries – Croatia, Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, Romania, Serbia and Montenegro, and Slovakia by age group and sex

CountryMale
Female
0-1920-4445-6465+all ages0-1920-4445-6465+all ages
Croatia
3.9
22.5
410.6
1674.7
204.4
3.8
19.6
197.6
746.4
98.0
Czech Republic
2.6
17.7
375.1
1643.5
193.4
2.2
19.3
223.3
856.4
109.8
Hungary
3.4
30.8
563.8
1530.3
226.1
2.7
28.9
275.0
785.7
118.1
Poland
4.3
19.3
396.1
1602.9
195.7
3.5
20.2
243.8
725.9
105.4
Romania
6.5
28.1
404.6
1082.7
164.8
4.8
30.9
210.7
560.1
91.6
Serbia and Montenegro
5.6
25.9
388.3
1148.3
165.2
4.0
29.2
249.9
624.0
102.7
Slovakia4.120.7428.11594.1201.64.018.9218.3707.999.1
Standardized mortality rates from all cancers in selected countries – Croatia, Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, Romania, Serbia and Montenegro, and Slovakia by age group and sex In women, the highest cancer mortality was found in Hungary (118.1/100 000) and the Czech Republic (109.8/100 000) and the lowest in Romania (91.6/100 000) and Croatia (98/100 000) (Table 5). Table 6 presents cancer mortality data by selected, the most common cancer sites. In most countries, the highest proportion of cancer mortality in men was attributed to lung cancer, followed by colorectal cancer and prostate cancer. In Romania, the ranking was different, with stomach cancer in the second place. Similarly, in Serbia and Montenegro, stomach cancer was the third cause of cancer mortality, followed by prostate cancer. The next positions among the ten most frequent cancers are occupied by pancreatic cancer, bladder cancer, liver cancer, laryngeal cancer, leukemia, esophageal cancer, and kidney cancer. Esophageal cancer was in the first ten in the Czech Republic, Slovakia, and Hungary, while kidney cancer was in the first ten in Croatia, Czech Republic, Poland, and Slovakia. In women, breast cancer had a dominant position in most countries. The proportion of cancer deaths due to breast cancer was between 13.1% (Poland) and 17.7% (Croatia). However, in two countries other cancer types caused more deaths in women: lung cancer and colorectal cancer in Hungary and colorectal cancer in Slovakia. Colorectal cancer and lung cancer were in second place, causing a similar proportion in cancer mortality. The next positions were taken by pancreatic cancer, ovarian cancer, and stomach cancer. In Romania, cervical cancer was the third most common cause of cancer deaths. This phenomenon was not observed in other countries.
Table 6

Age-standardized selected cancers mortality rates in selected countries (Croatia, Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, Romania, Slovakia in 2005, and Serbia and Montenegro in 2002)

CountryMale
Female
lungstomachlarge bowelprostatekidneyurinary bladderlungstomachlarge bowelbreastcervixovarykidneyurinary bladder
Croatia
55.3
14.3
25.0
15.3
4.9
6.3
10.7
5.9
12.0
17.4
2.5
5.7
1.8
1.2
Czech Republic
52.4
9.3
30.0
16.3
9.2
5.9
12.8
4.6
14.2
17.7
3.9
7.4
3.5
1.5
Hungary
72.5
12.4
31.9
13.0
5.4
6.9
22.3
5.8
16.4
19.2
4.9
5.6
2.2
1.6
Poland
64.6
13.6
18.8
12.9
5.8
8.0
14.3
4.9
10.8
14.9
5.7
7.0
2.2
1.3
Romania
48.2
15.4
15.6
9.0
2.8
5.7
8.5
5.3
9.1
16.6
10.7
5.4
1.1
1.1
Serbia and Montenegro
51.9
11.5
18.4
9.5
2.9
6.2
12.3
4.7
10.1
19.3
6.9
4.4
1.6
1.1
Slovakia50.512.030.614.95.95.47.85.713.315.35.15.92.71.2
Age-standardized selected cancers mortality rates in selected countries (Croatia, Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, Romania, Slovakia in 2005, and Serbia and Montenegro in 2002) The distribution of cancer deaths in men and women by site of tumor is presented in Figure 2.
Figure 2

Cancer deaths for 10 cancer sites by sex for selected countries – Croatia, Czech Republic, Hungary, Romania, Central Serbia, Poland, and Slovakia.

Cancer deaths for 10 cancer sites by sex for selected countries – Croatia, Czech Republic, Hungary, Romania, Central Serbia, Poland, and Slovakia. Mortality trends from all cancers in the last 20-40 years (depending on data available) are shown in Figure 3.
Figure 3

Mortality from all cancers over time in selected countries by sex; black triangle – Hungary, black square – Czech Republic, black circle – Poland, black cross – Slovakia, black rhomb – Croatia, white circle – Serbia and Montenegro, gray cross – Romania.

Mortality from all cancers over time in selected countries by sex; black triangle – Hungary, black square – Czech Republic, black circle – Poland, black cross – Slovakia, black rhomb – Croatia, white circle – Serbia and Montenegro, gray cross – Romania. Cancer mortality trends in the last 20-40 years show that there are two conflicting patterns in men. In Romania and Serbia and Montenegro, an increasing trend was observed while in other countries, after many years of increasing cancer mortality, rates were decreasing. The most significant decrease in cancer mortality was recorded in the Czech Republic and Slovakia. In the female population, an improving trend was observed in the Czech Republic, Hungary, and Slovakia, with a constant decrease in cancer mortality over many years in these countries. In other countries, cancer mortality in women remained unchanged.

Discussion

There are striking variations in cancer epidemiology and in quality of cancer care in different regions of the world (7). Differences in quality of cancer care have been observed between European countries, especially when “old” and “new” EU member states are compared (11,21,22). This study provides updated estimates of cancer epidemiology in eight selected Central, South and East European countries. Several sources of information and different methods have been used to generate these statistics. In general, the cancer problem is worst and fastest growing among developing countries and hence prompt action is needed using all known anticancer strategies, from primary prevention to early detection and adoption of the best available anticancer treatments (21). As mentioned, this article describes the cancer epidemiology situations in selected Central, South and Eastern European countries in order to address the specific problems and needs of different countries. The highest cancer incidence in men was found in Hungary (386.8/100,000), while the rates in Poland, Central Serbia, and Croatia were lower by a third and in Romania by half (Table 2). In women, the highest incidence rates were found in the Czech Republic (286.4/100 000) and Slovakia (257.9/100 000). The lowest incidence, below 200/100 000, was noted in Poland and Romania. Unfortunately, the observed age-standardized incidence rates are among the highest in the world, underlining the urgent need to invest more in the fight against cancer (1,3). Detailed analysis by age showing differences in the incidence of cancer in the age group 0-19 years of almost 50% in such a small region and between relatively similarly developed countries implies possible differences in the prevalence of underlying risk factors and differences in host susceptibility. However variations in cancer detection, reporting, classification, treatment, and follow-up may be even more important. For example, Romania has one of lowest incidence rates but the highest mortality rates, implying either inadequate reporting of cancer cases (lack of cancer register in Romania) or challenges in cancer treatment in patients in this age group. The observation that cancer incidence in young adults (20-44 years) is significantly higher in women than in men in most countries is in line with similar observation from Western Europe (1). But, in some countries such as the Czech Republic differences are three times higher, which warrants further investigations. Nevertheless, despite huge differences in incidence between the sexes, the mortality rates are similar, indicating the fact that women have more treatable tumors and better survival rates. In the middle-aged population (45-64 years), cancer incidence was about 30% higher in men than in women. Such difference in incidence rates results in even greater difference in mortality, meaning that men have double chance of dying of cancer than women. In the elderly population (≥65 years), cancer was diagnosed almost twice as often in men as in women. Cancer mortality in elderly men (≥65 years) was similar in Croatia, the Czech Republic, Poland, and Slovakia (1550-1675/100 000). It was about 20% lower ( ~ 1100/100 000) in Romania and Serbia and Montenegro. In women, a similar pattern was observed, with the lowest mortality in Serbia and Montenegro and Romania. In the former 15 EU countries, mortality trends for all cancer sites were more favorable than in Central and Eastern European accession countries that entered the EU in 2004 and 2007, including Hungary, Czech Republic, Poland, Slovakia, and Romania (10,11). In particular, these countries had the highest rates not only for lung cancer and other tobacco-related cancers, but also for gastric and cervical cancers and leukemias (10-12). Moreover, for all cancer sites, trends were more favorable in the former 15 EU countries than in these countries. According to Boyle et al, maintenance and potential improvement of favorable trends in cancer mortality would require a strategy focusing on the control of tobacco and alcohol consumption, nutrition and diet, and avoiding excessive sun exposure (23). Unfortunately, the highest tobacco consumption in Europe is in its Eastern part and highest alcohol consumption in the central part, particularly in the Czech Republic in which the average daily consumption was 56.9 g/L in men and 14.6g/L in women (24). For selected cancer sites, early diagnosis can also have a relevant impact, and this together with the universal adoption of recent therapeutic advances in countries from Central, South, and Eastern Europe may contribute to reducing the cancer mortality burden, as was most probably the case with cervical cancer mortality in Romania and Central Serbia (10,11). In 2000, total cancer mortality for men in the EU was 165.6/100 000, whereas total cancer mortality rates in the eight Central and Eastern European accession countries ranged from 194.5/100 000 in Lithuania to 269.3/100 000 in Hungary (10). The median cancer mortality rate in men for all countries in this SEEROG analysis was 193.02/100 000 (from 164.8/100 000 in Romania to 226.1/100 000 in Hungary). This cancer mortality rate was significantly higher than in five Western European countries (median 146.9/100 000 in 2005); the rates by country are: 152.4/100 000 in Spain, 163.6/100 000 in France, 138.7/100 000 in the UK, 136.4/100 000 in Ireland, and 143.2/100 000 in Germany (10). The cancer mortality rates for women in the SEEROG countries ranged from 91.6/100 000 in Romania to 118.1/100 000 in Hungary, while in the five Western European countries the rates ranged from 69.4/100 000 in Spain to 105.8/100 000 in Ireland. The median cancer mortality rate in the SEEROG countries was 103.52/100 000, compared with 89.72/100 000 in five Western European countries. The most important factors that influence cancer mortality rates are adequate cancer screening, diagnosis, and treatment (10,25). Also, and no less important, is the distribution of different types of cancer. Namely, while prostatic cancer is becoming the most common type of cancer in developed countries, lung cancer, a significantly more deadly tumor type, is the most prevalent cancer in the developing world. The excess mortality from these neoplasms in Eastern European countries could therefore be reduced if adequate resources, training, and logistics to deliver adequate diagnosis and treatment were implemented (26-29).
  14 in total

1.  Inequalities in health in Europe.

Authors:  F Levi; F Lucchini; S Franceschi; E Negri; C La Vecchia
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-03-31

2.  Estimating the world cancer burden: Globocan 2000.

Authors:  D M Parkin; F Bray; J Ferlay; P Pisani
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2001-10-15       Impact factor: 7.396

3.  Testicular cancer mortality in Eastern Europe.

Authors:  Fabio Levi; Franca Lucchini; Peter Boyle; Eva Negri; Carlo La Vecchia
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2003-07-01       Impact factor: 7.396

4.  The European Community expansion and cancer burden.

Authors:  Jaak Ph Janssens; Attilio Giacosa; Reinhold Stockbrügger
Journal:  Eur J Cancer Prev       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 2.497

5.  Trends and patterns of cancer mortality in European countries.

Authors:  J L F Antunes; T N Toporcov; F P de Andrade
Journal:  Eur J Cancer Prev       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 2.497

6.  European Code Against Cancer and scientific justification: third version (2003).

Authors:  P Boyle; P Autier; H Bartelink; J Baselga; P Boffetta; J Burn; H J G Burns; L Christensen; L Denis; M Dicato; V Diehl; R Doll; S Franceschi; C R Gillis; N Gray; L Griciute; A Hackshaw; M Kasler; M Kogevinas; S Kvinnsland; C La Vecchia; F Levi; J G McVie; P Maisonneuve; J M Martin-Moreno; J Newton Bishop; F Oleari; P Perrin; M Quinn; M Richards; U Ringborg; C Scully; E Siracka; H Storm; M Tubiana; T Tursz; U Veronesi; N Wald; W Weber; D G Zaridze; W Zatonski; H zur Hausen
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 32.976

7.  Trends in cancer mortality in the European Union and accession countries, 1980-2000.

Authors:  F Levi; F Lucchini; E Negri; W Zatonski; P Boyle; C La Vecchia
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 32.976

Review 8.  Testicular cancer: the challenge for cancer control.

Authors:  Peter Boyle
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 41.316

9.  Cancer mortality in Europe, 1995-1999, and an overview of trends since 1960.

Authors:  Fabio Levi; Franca Lucchini; Eva Negri; Peter Boyle; Carlo La Vecchia
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2004-06-10       Impact factor: 7.396

Review 10.  International comparators and poverty and health in Europe.

Authors:  M Marmot; M Bobak
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-11-04
View more
  18 in total

1.  Endothelial nitric oxide synthase gene polymorphisms and prostate cancer risk in Serbian population.

Authors:  Ana Branković; Goran Brajušković; Zorana Nikolić; Vinka Vukotić; Snežana Cerović; Dušanka Savić-Pavićević; Stanka Romac
Journal:  Int J Exp Pathol       Date:  2013-09-02       Impact factor: 1.925

2.  Expenditures on Oncology Drugs and Cancer Mortality-to-Incidence Ratio in Central and Eastern Europe.

Authors:  Eduard Vrdoljak; Gyorgy Bodoky; Jacek Jassem; Razvan Popescu; Robert Pirker; Tanja Čufer; Semir Bešlija; Alexandru Eniu; Vladimir Todorović; Katerina Kopečková; Galia Kurteva; Zorica Tomašević; Agim Sallaku; Snezhana Smichkoska; Žarko Bajić; Branimir Sikic
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2018-09-04

3.  Common variants at 8q24 are associated with prostate cancer risk in Serbian population.

Authors:  Ana S Branković; Goran N Brajušković; Jovan D Mirčetić; Zorana Z Nikolić; Predrag B Kalaba; Vinka D Vukotić; Saša M Tomović; Snežana J Cerović; Zoran A Radojičić; Dušanka L J Savić-Pavićević; Stanka P Romac
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2013-03-28       Impact factor: 3.201

4.  Assessment of association between common variants at 17q12 and prostate cancer risk-evidence from Serbian population and meta--analysis.

Authors:  Zorana Z Nikolić; Ana S Branković; Dušanka L J Savić-Pavićević; Stefan M Preković; Vinka D Vukotić; Snežana J Cerović; Nataša N Filipović; Saša M Tomović; Stanka P Romac; Goran N Brajušković
Journal:  Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2014-01-14       Impact factor: 4.689

5.  Central and Eastern European experience with sunitinib in metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a sub-analysis of the global expanded-access trial.

Authors:  Eduard Vrdoljak; Lajos Géczi; Jozef Mardiak; Tudor-Eliade Ciuleanu; Sophie Leyman; Ke Zhang; Peter Sajben; Laszlo Torday
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2015-01-04       Impact factor: 3.201

6.  The association between estrogen receptor alpha polymorphisms and the risk of prostate cancer in Slovak population.

Authors:  Jana Jurečeková; Monika Kmetová Sivoňová; Andrea Evinová; Ján Kliment; Dušan Dobrota
Journal:  Mol Cell Biochem       Date:  2013-06-05       Impact factor: 3.396

7.  Prostate cancer incidence and survival in immigrants to Sweden.

Authors:  Kari Hemminki; Donna P Ankerst; Jan Sundquist; Seyed Mohsen Mousavi
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2013-01-11       Impact factor: 4.226

8.  Pancreatoduodenectomy En Bloc With Vascular Resections in Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer.

Authors:  Nicolae Bacalbasa; Adina Croitoru; Irina Balescu; Simona Dima; Vladislav Brasoveanu; Mihaela Vilcu; Iulian Brezean
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2019 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.155

9.  Temporal trends in the surgical outcomes of patients with breast cancer.

Authors:  Takeshi Hanagiri; Yoshika Nagata; Shoko Monji; Shinji Shinohara; Masaru Takenaka; Yoshiki Shigematsu; Hidehiko Shimokawa; Makoto Nakagawa; Hidetaka Uramoto; Tomoko So; Fumihiro Tanaka
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2012-06-14       Impact factor: 2.754

10.  Detection of premalignant bronchial lesions can be significantly improved by combination of advanced bronchoscopic imaging techniques.

Authors:  Bojan Zaric; Branislav Perin; Vladimir Stojsic; Vladimir Carapic; Jovan Matijasevic; Ilija Andrijevic; Zivka Eri
Journal:  Ann Thorac Med       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 2.219

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.