Literature DB >> 21853393

Safety of open technique for first-trocar placement in laparoscopic surgery: a series of 6,000 cases.

Pawanindra Lal1, Anubhav Vindal, Rajeev Sharma, Jagdish Chander, Vinod Kumar Ramteke.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The open technique for the placement of the first trocar in laparoscopic surgery has become the preferred method due to the reduced number of complications associated with it. In 2002 we reported our technique, which has been widely accepted at many centers, including all the units of our hospital. We now report on a series of 6,000 cases in which this technique was used.
METHOD: The method is the same as that reported by us previously (Surg Endosc 16:1366-1370, [10]) except for the minor modification of using a Mayo towel clip instead of the Allis forceps for holding the cicatrix pillar, as the pillar tends not to slip out of the former. During closure, Allis forceps is used to lift the divided rectus sheath on each side to take the suture bite and ensure complete secure closure. A total of 6,000 consecutive cases have been performed using this technique in two tertiary care hospitals over the last 11 years.
RESULTS: A total of 6,000 cases (5,350 females and 650 males) were operated on over an 11-year period. There were no visceral or vascular complications. Four hundred seventy-five patients (7.9%) had had previous abdominal surgery. The supraumbilical route was used in 348 patients and lateral entry in 90 patients. Port-site hernias were seen in 25 cases (0.4%) and wound infections in 56 cases (0.9%). The average time for trocar placement was 2 min (range = 1-12 min) and the average port size was 15 mm (range = 12-22 mm). The average time for port closure at the end of the procedure was 3 min (range = 1-7 min).
CONCLUSIONS: The technique of open-trocar placement in laparoscopic surgery has now become standardized, with its safety having been well established. Our experience has shown that this technique is safe, effective, reproducible, easy to learn, can be performed quickly, and has excellent results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21853393     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-011-1852-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  29 in total

1.  A technique for open trocar placement in laparoscopic surgery using the umbilical cicatrix tube.

Authors:  Pawanindra Lal; R Sharma; R Chander; V K Ramteke
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  A multi-center study of a modified open trocar first-puncture approach in 17 350 patients for laparoscopic entry.

Authors:  Hai-fang Liu; Xu Chen; Yan Liu
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2009-11-20       Impact factor: 2.628

3.  Pneumoperitoneum needle and trocar injuries in laparoscopy. A survey on possible contributing factors and prevention.

Authors:  A A Yuzpe
Journal:  J Reprod Med       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 0.142

4.  [Laparoscopic surgery: injuries caused by trocars. (French Survey 1994) in reference to 103,852 interventions].

Authors:  G Champault; F Cazacu
Journal:  J Chir (Paris)       Date:  1995-03

5.  Survey of laparoscopic entry injuries provoking litigation.

Authors:  S L Corson; J G Chandler; L W Way
Journal:  J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc       Date:  2001-08

6.  Open laparoscopic access using a radially dilating trocar: experience and indications in 50 consecutive cases.

Authors:  D C Cuellar; P K Kavoussi; L A Baker; S G Docimo
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 2.942

7.  Major vascular injury during gynecologic laparoscopy. Report of a case and review of published cases.

Authors:  S E Baadsgaard; S Bille; K Egeblad
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 3.636

Review 8.  Injuries caused by Veress needle insertion for creation of pneumoperitoneum: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  João Luiz Moreira Coutinho Azevedo; Otavio Cansanção Azevedo; Susana Abe Miyahira; Gustavo Peixoto Soares Miguel; Otávio Monteiro Becker; Octávio Henrique Mendes Hypólito; Afonso Cesar Cabral Guedes Machado; Wellington Cardia; Gilmara Aguiar Yamaguchi; Lola Godinho; Dalmer Freire; Carlos Eduardo Saldanha Almeida; Camila Hobi Moreira; Dalmer Faria Freire
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-03-05       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Risks of blind versus open approach to celiotomy for laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  H H Sigman; G M Fried; J Garzon; E J Hinchey; M J Wexler; J L Meakins; J S Barkun
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc       Date:  1993-08

10.  A modified laparoscopic entry technique using a finger and rubber catheter.

Authors:  L Campos; M Espinosa
Journal:  J Laparoendosc Surg       Date:  1991-06
View more
  3 in total

1.  Risk Factors for Transumbilical Wound Complications in Laparoscopic Gastric and Colorectal Surgery.

Authors:  Kodai Tomioka; Masahiko Murakami; Akira Fujimori; Makoto Watanabe; Tomotake Koizumi; Satoru Goto; Koji Otsuka; Takeshi Aoki
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2017 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.155

2.  Comparison of two entry methods for laparoscopic port entry: technical point of view.

Authors:  Adriana Toro; Maurizio Mannino; Giovanni Cappello; Andrea Di Stefano; Isidoro Di Carlo
Journal:  Diagn Ther Endosc       Date:  2012-06-13

3.  Optimal Initial Trocar Placement for Morbidly Obese Patients.

Authors:  Benjamin Clapp
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2018 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.172

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.