PURPOSE: To investigate relationship between second virial coefficient B (2) and viscosity and aggregation propensity of highly concentrated monoclonal antibody (MAbs) solutions. METHODS: Intermolecular interactions of 3 MAbs solutions with varying pH were characterized according to B (2) estimated by analytical ultracentrifugation sedimentation equilibrium with initial loading concentrations <10 mg/mL. Viscosity measurements and stability assessments of MAb solutions at concentrations higher than 100 mg/mL were conducted. RESULTS: B (2) of all MAb solutions depended on solution pH and have qualitative correlation with viscosity and aggregation propensity. The more negative the B (2) values, the more viscous the solution, acquiring increased propensity to aggregate. Solutions with B (2) values of ~2 × 10(-5) mL·mol/g(2) acquire similar viscosity and aggregation propensity regardless of amino acid sequences; for solutions with negative B (2) values, viscosity and aggregation propensity differed depending on sequences. Results suggest attractive intermolecular interactions represented by negative B (2) values are influenced by surface properties of individual MAbs. CONCLUSIONS: B (2) can be used, within certain limitations, as an effective indicator of viscosity and aggregation propensity of highly concentrated MAb solutions.
PURPOSE: To investigate relationship between second virial coefficient B (2) and viscosity and aggregation propensity of highly concentrated monoclonal antibody (MAbs) solutions. METHODS: Intermolecular interactions of 3 MAbs solutions with varying pH were characterized according to B (2) estimated by analytical ultracentrifugation sedimentation equilibrium with initial loading concentrations <10 mg/mL. Viscosity measurements and stability assessments of MAb solutions at concentrations higher than 100 mg/mL were conducted. RESULTS: B (2) of all MAb solutions depended on solution pH and have qualitative correlation with viscosity and aggregation propensity. The more negative the B (2) values, the more viscous the solution, acquiring increased propensity to aggregate. Solutions with B (2) values of ~2 × 10(-5) mL·mol/g(2) acquire similar viscosity and aggregation propensity regardless of amino acid sequences; for solutions with negative B (2) values, viscosity and aggregation propensity differed depending on sequences. Results suggest attractive intermolecular interactions represented by negative B (2) values are influenced by surface properties of individual MAbs. CONCLUSIONS: B (2) can be used, within certain limitations, as an effective indicator of viscosity and aggregation propensity of highly concentrated MAb solutions.
Authors: Eva Y Chi; Sampathkumar Krishnan; Brent S Kendrick; Byeong S Chang; John F Carpenter; Theodore W Randolph Journal: Protein Sci Date: 2003-05 Impact factor: 6.725
Authors: Sheng-Jiun Wu; Jinquan Luo; Karyn T O'Neil; James Kang; Eilyn R Lacy; Gabriela Canziani; Audrey Baker; Maggie Huang; Qing Mike Tang; T Shantha Raju; Steven A Jacobs; Alexey Teplyakov; Gary L Gilliland; Yiqing Feng Journal: Protein Eng Des Sel Date: 2010-06-11 Impact factor: 1.650
Authors: Yatin R Gokarn; R Matthew Fesinmeyer; Atul Saluja; Shawn Cao; Jane Dankberg; Andrew Goetze; Richard L Remmele; Linda O Narhi; David N Brems Journal: Protein Sci Date: 2009-01 Impact factor: 6.725
Authors: Branden A Salinas; Hasige A Sathish; Steven M Bishop; Nick Harn; John F Carpenter; Theodore W Randolph Journal: J Pharm Sci Date: 2010-01 Impact factor: 3.534
Authors: Pilarin Nichols; Li Li; Sandeep Kumar; Patrick M Buck; Satish K Singh; Sumit Goswami; Bryan Balthazor; Tami R Conley; David Sek; Martin J Allen Journal: MAbs Date: 2015 Impact factor: 5.857
Authors: Douglas D Banks; Jon F Cordia; Vladimir Spasojevic; Jeonghoon Sun; Sarah Franc; Younhee Cho Journal: Protein Sci Date: 2018-12 Impact factor: 6.725
Authors: Brian D Connolly; Chris Petry; Sandeep Yadav; Barthélemy Demeule; Natalie Ciaccio; Jamie M R Moore; Steven J Shire; Yatin R Gokarn Journal: Biophys J Date: 2012-07-03 Impact factor: 4.033