Literature DB >> 21852697

Universal antenatal screening for group B streptococcus in Emilia-Romagna.

Alberto Berardi1, Giorgia Di Fazzio, Sara Gavioli, Ezio Di Grande, Alessandra Groppi, Irene Papa, Giancarlo Piccinini, Angela Simoni, Elisabetta Tridapalli, Alessandro Volta, Fabio Facchinetti, Fabrizio Ferrari.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Group B streptococcus (GBS) is a leading cause of severe infections in newborns. Intrapartum antibiotic chemoprophylaxis (IAP) reduces the rate of early-onset disease. The aim of this study is to determine the degree of clinicians' compliance with the suggested protocol for GBS prevention in Emilia-Romagna (Italy).
METHODS: Characteristics of each delivery were prospectively recorded in the period between October 2005 to December 2005. Standardized pro-forma were used to collect data.
RESULTS: Among 5118 babies, 7.2% (369) were preterm and 92.3% were born at term (4749). Antenatal screening was performed in 86.6% of women who delivered at term, of which 18.1% were GBS culture-positive. Information regarding culture site was available in 93.2% of women screened and recto-vaginal cultures were documented in 42.7%. IAP was administered to 28.7% of 3937 women at term who had either spontaneous delivery or emergency caesarean section. In this cohort, 15.9% were diagnosed GBS culture-positive, of which 92.6% received IAP. Prophylaxis was also administered to 8.4% (331) of women for no apparent reason. Compared with tertiary level hospitals, women delivering in primary/secondary hospitals were more likely to be both GBS screened (P < 0.0001; OR 3.04; CI 2.33-3.97) and to receive prophylaxis ≥4 hours before delivery (P = 0.0025; OR 1.57; CI 1.17-2.12).
CONCLUSIONS: GBS screening was performed in >85% of women and >90% of culture-positive women received prophylaxis. However, there is a need to educate clinicians about protocol adherence, as most cultures were suboptimal and cases of unnecessary IAP were administered. The screening was more effective in hospitals with fewer deliveries.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21852697     DOI: 10.1258/jms.2011.011023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Screen        ISSN: 0969-1413            Impact factor:   2.136


  8 in total

Review 1.  Prevention of group B streptococcal neonatal disease revisited. The DEVANI European project.

Authors:  J Rodriguez-Granger; J C Alvargonzalez; A Berardi; R Berner; M Kunze; M Hufnagel; P Melin; A Decheva; G Orefici; C Poyart; J Telford; A Efstratiou; M Killian; P Krizova; L Baldassarri; B Spellerberg; A Puertas; M Rosa-Fraile
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 3.267

2.  Screening of group B Streptococcus infection in pregnancy and neonatal outcomes in the province of Trento, Italy.

Authors:  Silvano Piffer; Roberto Rizzello; Mariangela Pedron; Laura Dellanna; Anna Lina Lauriola
Journal:  Infez Med       Date:  2022-06-01

3.  Appropriateness of Intrapartum Antibiotic Prophylaxis to Prevent Neonatal Group B Streptococcus Disease.

Authors:  Aida Bianco; Elisabetta Larosa; Claudia Pileggi; Maria Pavia
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-11-18       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Factors associated with choice of approach for Group B streptococcus screening.

Authors:  H Sefty; A Klivitsky; M Bromberg; R Dichtiar; M Ben Ami; T Shohat; A Glatman-Freedman
Journal:  Isr J Health Policy Res       Date:  2016-11-15

5.  Secondary prevention of early-onset sepsis: a less invasive Italian approach for managing neonates at risk.

Authors:  Alberto Berardi; Chryssoula Tzialla; Laura Travan; Jenny Bua; Daniele Santori; Milena Azzalli; Caterina Spada; Laura Lucaccioni
Journal:  Ital J Pediatr       Date:  2018-06-28       Impact factor: 2.638

6.  Should we give antibiotics to neonates with mild non-progressive symptoms? A comparison of serial clinical observation and the neonatal sepsis risk calculator.

Authors:  Alberto Berardi; Isotta Zinani; Luca Bedetti; Eleonora Vaccina; Alessandra Toschi; Greta Toni; Marco Lecis; Federica Leone; Francesca Monari; Michela Cozzolino; Tommaso Zini; Alessandra Boncompagni; Lorenzo Iughetti; Francesca Miselli; Licia Lugli
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2022-07-22       Impact factor: 3.569

Review 7.  Neonatal septic shock, a focus on first line interventions.

Authors:  Valentina Spaggiari; Erica Passini; Sara Crestani; Maria Federica Roversi; Luca Bedetti; Katia Rossi; Laura Lucaccioni; Cecilia Baraldi; Elisa Della Casa Muttini; Licia Lugli; Lorenzo Iughetti; Alberto Berardi
Journal:  Acta Biomed       Date:  2022-07-01

8.  Epidemiology and complications of late-onset sepsis: an Italian area-based study.

Authors:  Alberto Berardi; Francesca Sforza; Lorenza Baroni; Caterina Spada; Simone Ambretti; Giacomo Biasucci; Serenella Bolognesi; Mariagrazia Capretti; Edoardo Carretto; Matilde Ciccia; Marcello Lanari; Maria Federica Pedna; Vittoria Rizzo; Claudia Venturelli; Crisoula Tzialla; Laura Lucaccioni; Maria Letizia Bacchi Reggiani
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-11-22       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.