Literature DB >> 21852653

The wrong tool for the job: diabetes public health programs and practice guidelines.

Urmimala Sarkar1, Andrea López, Karen Black, Dean Schillinger.   

Abstract

We surveyed state diabetes programs to determine whether they develop and disseminate diabetes guidelines. We found they largely disseminate clinical practice guidelines developed from subspecialty organizations, do not prioritize among the many recommendations contained in diabetes guidelines, and have not adapted guidelines to focus on population rather than individual health. An opportunity exists for state diabetes control programs to better align guidelines with public health goals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21852653      PMCID: PMC3222377          DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2011.300148

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN: 0090-0036            Impact factor:   9.308


  28 in total

1.  A systematic review of randomized trials of disease management programs in heart failure.

Authors:  F A McAlister; F M Lawson; K K Teo; P W Armstrong
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2001-04-01       Impact factor: 4.965

2.  Relationships between authors of clinical practice guidelines and the pharmaceutical industry.

Authors:  Niteesh K Choudhry; Henry Thomas Stelfox; Allan S Detsky
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2002-02-06       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Optimal blood pressure for a patient with type 2 diabetes mellitus: insight from the ACCORD study.

Authors:  Matthew R Weir; George L Bakris
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 5.369

4.  Reassessment of clinical practice guidelines: go gently into that good night.

Authors:  Terrence M Shaneyfelt; Robert M Centor
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2009-02-25       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Inside guidelines: comparative analysis of recommendations and evidence in diabetes guidelines from 13 countries.

Authors:  Jako S Burgers; Julia V Bailey; Niek S Klazinga; Akke K Van Der Bij; Richard Grol; Gene Feder
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 19.112

6.  Hypoglycemia is more common among type 2 diabetes patients with limited health literacy: the Diabetes Study of Northern California (DISTANCE).

Authors:  Urmimala Sarkar; Andrew J Karter; Jennifer Y Liu; Howard H Moffet; Nancy E Adler; Dean Schillinger
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2010-05-18       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  Effects of intensive blood-pressure control in type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  William C Cushman; Gregory W Evans; Robert P Byington; David C Goff; Richard H Grimm; Jeffrey A Cutler; Denise G Simons-Morton; Jan N Basile; Marshall A Corson; Jeffrey L Probstfield; Lois Katz; Kevin A Peterson; William T Friedewald; John B Buse; J Thomas Bigger; Hertzel C Gerstein; Faramarz Ismail-Beigi
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-03-14       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Predicted quality-adjusted life years as a composite measure of the clinical value of diabetes risk factor control.

Authors:  Julie Schmittdiel; Sandeep Vijan; Bruce Fireman; Jennifer Elston Lafata; Nina Oestreicher; Joe V Selby
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 2.983

9.  Implementing program evaluation and accountability for population health: progress of a national diabetes control effort.

Authors:  Marc A Safran; Qaiser Mukhtar; Dara L Murphy
Journal:  J Public Health Manag Pract       Date:  2003 Jan-Feb

10.  Cost-effectiveness of detecting and treating diabetic retinopathy.

Authors:  J C Javitt; L P Aiello
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1996-01-01       Impact factor: 25.391

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.