BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Data on the predictive value of carotid intima-media thickness (IMT) for stroke recurrence are scarce. We sought to analyze outcome differences in stroke patients with high IMT values compared with patients with significant carotid stenosis (SCS). METHODS: The multicenter observational ARTICO study included 620 independent patients older than 60 years with a first-ever noncardioembolic stroke. Patients were followed-up for 1 year. The primary end point was a composite of cardiovascular events and death. The IMT-ARTICO substudy analyzed ultrasonographic data from 599 patients. After Doppler carotid echography, patients were classified into the SCS group (carotid stenosis ≥50%; 117 cases), high IMT group (patients with the common carotid IMT in the highest quartile ≥1.11 mm and without SCS; 110 cases), and control group (stroke patients with an IMT <1.11 mm and without SCS; 372 cases). We analyzed the impact of both conditions on the primary end point. RESULTS: During follow-up, 88 patients (14.7%) had an end point event. Univariate analysis showed that male gender, diabetes, symptomatic peripheral arterial disease, ankle brachial index ≤0.9, SCS, and high IMT were related to the primary end point. Cox regression showed that peripheral arterial disease (hazard ratio [HR], 2.06; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.18-3.59; P=0.011), SCS (HR, 3.02; 95% CI, 1.78-5.13; P=0.0001), and high IMT (HR, 1.86; 95% CI, 1.05-3.29; P=0.032) were related to the primary end point. If patients with scheduled revascularization procedures were excluded from the Cox regression, then ultrasonographic markers were SCS (HR, 1.84; 95% CI, 1.03-3.28; P<0.039) and high IMT (HR, 1.86; 95% CI, 1.06-3.27; P=0.030). CONCLUSIONS: Both SCS and high IMT have an independent impact as markers of major cardiovascular events or death after a first-ever noncardioembolic stroke.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Data on the predictive value of carotid intima-media thickness (IMT) for stroke recurrence are scarce. We sought to analyze outcome differences in strokepatients with high IMT values compared with patients with significant carotid stenosis (SCS). METHODS: The multicenter observational ARTICO study included 620 independent patients older than 60 years with a first-ever noncardioembolic stroke. Patients were followed-up for 1 year. The primary end point was a composite of cardiovascular events and death. The IMT-ARTICO substudy analyzed ultrasonographic data from 599 patients. After Doppler carotid echography, patients were classified into the SCS group (carotid stenosis ≥50%; 117 cases), high IMT group (patients with the common carotid IMT in the highest quartile ≥1.11 mm and without SCS; 110 cases), and control group (strokepatients with an IMT <1.11 mm and without SCS; 372 cases). We analyzed the impact of both conditions on the primary end point. RESULTS: During follow-up, 88 patients (14.7%) had an end point event. Univariate analysis showed that male gender, diabetes, symptomatic peripheral arterial disease, ankle brachial index ≤0.9, SCS, and high IMT were related to the primary end point. Cox regression showed that peripheral arterial disease (hazard ratio [HR], 2.06; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.18-3.59; P=0.011), SCS (HR, 3.02; 95% CI, 1.78-5.13; P=0.0001), and high IMT (HR, 1.86; 95% CI, 1.05-3.29; P=0.032) were related to the primary end point. If patients with scheduled revascularization procedures were excluded from the Cox regression, then ultrasonographic markers were SCS (HR, 1.84; 95% CI, 1.03-3.28; P<0.039) and high IMT (HR, 1.86; 95% CI, 1.06-3.27; P=0.030). CONCLUSIONS: Both SCS and high IMT have an independent impact as markers of major cardiovascular events or death after a first-ever noncardioembolic stroke.
Authors: Claudia K Suemoto; Lea T Grinberg; Renata E P Leite; Renata E L Ferretti-Rebustini; Wilson Jacob-Filho; Kristine Yaffe; Ricardo Nitrini; Carlos A Pasqualucci Journal: Atherosclerosis Date: 2017-12-09 Impact factor: 5.162
Authors: David Della-Morte; Chuanhui Dong; Matthew S Markert; Mitchell S V Elkind; Ralph L Sacco; Clinton B Wright; Tatjana Rundek Journal: Stroke Date: 2017-12-28 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Hyun Ju Yoon; Kye Hun Kim; Hyukjin Park; Jae Yeong Cho; Young Joon Hong; Hyung Wook Park; Ju Han Kim; Youngkeun Ahn; Myung Ho Jeong; Jeong Gwan Cho; Jong Chun Park Journal: Cardiovasc Ultrasound Date: 2017-07-24 Impact factor: 2.062
Authors: Elisa Cuadrado-Godia; Ander Regueiro; Julio Núñez; Maribel Díaz-Ricard; Susana Novella; Anna Oliveras; Miguel A Valverde; Jaume Marrugat; Angel Ois; Eva Giralt-Steinhauer; Juan Sanchís; Ginès Escolar; Carlos Hermenegildo; Magda Heras; Jaume Roquer Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-09-02 Impact factor: 3.240