Literature DB >> 21851149

Variation in working memory capacity and cognitive control: goal maintenance and microadjustments of control.

Nash Unsworth1, Thomas S Redick, Gregory J Spillers, Gene A Brewer.   

Abstract

Variation in working memory capacity (WMC) and cognitive control was examined in four experiments. In the experiments high- and low-WMC individuals performed a choice reaction time task (Experiment 1), a version of the antisaccade task (Experiment 2), a version of the Stroop task (Experiment 3), and an arrow version of the flanker task (Experiment 4). An examination of response time distributions suggested that high- and low-WMC individuals primarily differed in the slowest responses in each experiment, consistent with the notion that WMC is related to active maintenance abilities. Examination of two indicators of microadjustments of control (posterror slowing and conflict adaptation effects) suggested no differences between high- and low-WMC individuals. Collectively these results suggest that variation in WMC is related to some, but not all, cognitive control operations. The results are interpreted within the executive attention theory of WMC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21851149     DOI: 10.1080/17470218.2011.597865

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)        ISSN: 1747-0218            Impact factor:   2.143


  15 in total

Review 1.  A locus coeruleus-norepinephrine account of individual differences in working memory capacity and attention control.

Authors:  Nash Unsworth; Matthew K Robison
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-08

2.  Working memory capacity and intra-individual variability of proactive control.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Wiemers; Thomas S Redick
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2017-11-08

3.  Carving executive control at its joints: Working memory capacity predicts stimulus-stimulus, but not stimulus-response, conflict.

Authors:  Matt E Meier; Michael J Kane
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2015-06-29       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  Interactive effects of working memory and trial history on Stroop interference in cognitively healthy aging.

Authors:  Andrew J Aschenbrenner; David A Balota
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2015-01-19

5.  Assessing anxiety-linked impairment in attentional control without eye-tracking: The masked-target antisaccade task.

Authors:  Julian Basanovic; Jemma Todd; Bram van Bockstaele; Lies Notebaert; Frances Meeten; Patrick J F Clarke
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2022-03-15

6.  Distinct but correlated latent factors support the regulation of learned conflict-control and task-switching.

Authors:  Christina Bejjani; Rick H Hoyle; Tobias Egner
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2022-04-08       Impact factor: 3.746

7.  Cognitive Control Moderates the Health Benefits of Trait Self-Regulation in Young Adults.

Authors:  Jonathan G Hakun; Margaret A Findeison
Journal:  Pers Individ Dif       Date:  2019-08-30

8.  Individual differences in the executive control of attention, memory, and thought, and their associations with schizotypy.

Authors:  Michael J Kane; Matt E Meier; Bridget A Smeekens; Georgina M Gross; Charlotte A Chun; Paul J Silvia; Thomas R Kwapil
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2016-06-16

Review 9.  Training cognition in ADHD: current findings, borrowed concepts, and future directions.

Authors:  Kyle J Rutledge; Wouter van den Bos; Samuel M McClure; Julie B Schweitzer
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 7.620

10.  The role of affective interference and mnemonic load in the dynamic adjustment in working memory.

Authors:  Jonathan B Banks; Anum Mallick; Alexandra C Nieto; Anthony P Zanesco; Amishi P Jha
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2022-03-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.