| Literature DB >> 21850198 |
Yasuko Aida1, Yoko Shibata, Daisuke Osaka, Shuichi Abe, Sumito Inoue, Koji Fukuzaki, Yoshikane Tokairin, Akira Igarashi, Keiko Yamauchi, Takako Nemoto, Keiko Nunomiya, Hiroyuki Kishi, Masamichi Sato, Tetsu Watanabe, Tsuneo Konta, Sumio Kawata, Takeo Kato, Isao Kubota.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Tissue hypoxia induces the degradation of adenosine triphosphate, resulting in the production of uric acid (UA). Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) have been reported to have high serum levels of UA (sUA), compared with control subjects. However, the relationship between sUA levels and spirometric measures has not been investigated in detail in a general population.Entities:
Keywords: epidemiology; pulmonary function; spirometry; uric acid
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21850198 PMCID: PMC3156995 DOI: 10.7150/ijms.8.470
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Med Sci ISSN: 1449-1907 Impact factor: 3.738
Differences in the characteristics of male and female subjects
| All subjects (n=2917) | Males (n=1325) | Females (n=1592) |
|---|---|---|
| Age, years | 63.2 ± 10.3 | 62.5 ± 10.1* |
| BMI, kg/m2 | 23.5 ± 3.0 | 23.6 ± 3.4 |
| Smoking index | 279.4 ± 406.0 | 13.6 ± 77.5** |
| Ethanol intake, g/day | 23.2 ± 22.5 | 2.5 ± 8.0** |
| Mean BP, mm Hg | 99.8 ± 11.0 | 95.6 ± 10.9** |
| HbA1C, % | 5.2 ± 0.8 | 5.2 ± 0.6 |
| sCr, mg/dL | 0.78 ± 0.27 | 0.59 ± 0.11** |
| Uric acid, mg/dL | 5.8 ± 1.3 | 4.5 ± 1.1** |
| FVC %predicted | 97.6 ± 14.7 | 100.2 ± 14.4** |
| FEV1 %predicted | 95.7 ± 17.5 | 99.9 ± 15.6** |
Differences in smoking index and ethanol intake between males and females were assessed for statistical significance using the Mann-Whitney U test.
Data are mean ± SD. *P <0.05 compared with male subjects, **P <0.001 compared with male subjects.
Smoking index = daily consumption of cigarettes x years of smoking
Ethanol intake = grams of ethanol consumed per day
Mean BP = diastolic BP + (average systolic BP - average diastolic BP)/3
BMI, body mass index; BP, blood pressure; HbA1c, hemoglobin A1c; sCr, serum creatinine; FVC %predicted, percent predicted forced vital capacity; FEV1 %predicted, percent predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 s
Figure 1Correlations between spirometric parameters and serum uric acid levels in males and females. Graphs show the relationships of FVC %predicted (A & B) and FEV1 %predicted (C & D) with serum uric acid in males (A & C) and females (B & D). In males, FVC %predicted and FEV1 %predicted were not significantly associated with serum uric acid levels (A & C). However, in females, there were inverse relationships between these spirometric parameters and serum uric acid levels (B & D).
Univariate and multivariate regression analyses to identify factors that were predictive for serum uric acid levels
| Males | Females | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coefficient | SE | Coefficient | SE | ||||
| Age, years | -0.019 | 0.003 | <.0001 | 0.014 | 0.003 | <.0001 | |
| BMI, kg/m2 | 0.090 | 0.012 | <.0001 | 0.079 | 0.008 | <.0001 | |
| Smoking index | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.082 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.779 | |
| Ethanol intake, g/day | 0.006 | 0.002 | <.0001 | 0.000 | 0.003 | 0.974 | |
| Mean BP, mmHg | 0.013 | 0.003 | <.0001 | 0.016 | 0.002 | <.0001 | |
| HbA1c, % | -0.053 | 0.047 | 0.261 | 0.243 | 0.045 | <.0001 | |
| sCr, mg/dL | 1.237 | 0.125 | <.0001 | 3.080 | 0.225 | <.0001 | |
| FVC %predicted | -0.004 | 0.002 | 0.064 | -0.010 | 0.002 | <.0001 | |
| FEV1 %predicted | -0.002 | 0.002 | 0.305 | -0.008 | 0.002 | <.0001 | |
| Age, years | -0.016 | 0.003 | <.0001 | 0.006 | 0.003 | 0.019 | |
| BMI, kg/m2 | 0.076 | 0.012 | <.0001 | 0.061 | 0.008 | <.0001 | |
| Smoking index | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.111 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.640 | |
| Ethanol intake, g/day | 0.005 | 0.002 | 0.000 | 0.007 | 0.003 | 0.027 | |
| Mean BP, mmHg | 0.007 | 0.003 | 0.018 | 0.008 | 0.002 | 0.001 | |
| HbA1c, % | -0.077 | 0.045 | 0.086 | 0.142 | 0.042 | 0.001 | |
| sCr, mg/dL | 1.297 | 0.121 | <.0001 | 2.947 | 0.217 | <.0001 | |
| FVC %predicted | -0.006 | 0.002 | 0.009 | -0.007 | 0.002 | <.0001 | |
| Age, years | -0.016 | 0.003 | <.0001 | 0.006 | 0.003 | 0.021 | |
| BMI, kg/m2 | 0.076 | 0.012 | <.0001 | 0.062 | 0.008 | <.0001 | |
| Smoking index | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.136 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.674 | |
| Ethanol intake, g/day | 0.005 | 0.002 | 0.001 | 0.007 | 0.003 | 0.035 | |
| Mean BP, mmHg | 0.007 | 0.003 | 0.020 | 0.008 | 0.002 | 0.001 | |
| HbA1c, % | -0.070 | 0.045 | 0.119 | 0.143 | 0.042 | 0.001 | |
| sCr, mg/dL | 1.297 | 0.121 | <.0001 | 2.963 | 0.216 | <.0001 | |
| FEV1 %predicted | -0.004 | 0.002 | 0.030 | -0.007 | 0.002 | <.0001 | |
BMI, body mass index; BP, blood pressure; HbA1c, hemoglobin A1c; sCr, serum creatinine; FVC %predicted, percent predicted forced vital capacity; FEV1 %predicted, percent predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 s
Multiple logistic analyses to identify factors that were predictive for hyperuricemia (serum uric acid >7.0 mg/dL)
| Males | Females | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR | 95% CI | OR | 95% CI | ||||||
| Age (per 1 year increase) | 0.975 | (0.962, | 0.988) | 0.000 | 1.039 | (1.008, | 1.072) | 0.014 | |
| BMI (per 1 kg/m2 increase) | 1.117 | (1.066, | 1.172) | <.0001 | 1.128 | (1.042, | 1.223) | 0.003 | |
| Smoking index (per 1 cig/y increase) | 1.000 | (1.000, | 1.000) | 0.750 | - | - | |||
| Ethanol intake (per 1 g/day increase) | 1.011 | (1.005, | 1.017) | 0.000 | 1.014 | (0.966, | 1.046) | 0.494 | |
| mean BP (per 1 mmHg increase) | 1.018 | (1.006, | 1.031) | 0.004 | 1.012 | (0.985, | 1.039) | 0.384 | |
| HbA1C (per 1 % increase) | 0.930 | (0.760, | 1.123) | 0.461 | 1.306 | (0.863, | 1.838) | 0.198 | |
| sCr (per 0.1 mg/dL increase) | 6.139 | (2.324, | 16.851) | <.0001 | 20.703 | (3.167, | 165.303) | <.0001 | |
| FVC % predicted (per 1% increase) | 0.991 | (0.982, | 1.001) | 0.075 | 0.970 | (0.952, | 0.989) | 0.002 | |
| Age (per 1 year increase) | 0.973 | (0.960, | 0.987) | <.0001 | 1.039 | (1.007, | 1.073) | 0.016 | |
| BMI (per 1 kg/m2 increase) | 1.120 | (1.068, | 1.175) | <.0001 | 1.131 | (1.045, | 1.226) | 0.002 | |
| Smoking index (per 1 cig*y increase) | 1.000 | (1.000, | 1.000) | 0.881 | - | - | |||
| Ethanol intake (per 1 g/day increase) | 1.011 | (1.005, | 1.017) | 0.000 | 1.013 | (0.966, | 1.045) | 0.518 | |
| mean BP (per 1 mmHg increase) | 1.019 | (1.006, | 1.032) | 0.004 | 1.014 | (0.987, | 1.041) | 0.316 | |
| HbA1C (per 1 % increase) | 0.937 | (0.766, | 1.130) | 0.506 | 1.329 | (0.880, | 1.864) | 0.169 | |
| sCr (per 0.1 mg/dL increase) | 6.374 | (2.411, | 17.515) | <.0001 | 23.081 | (3.464, | 185.534) | <.0001 | |
| FEV1 % predicted (per 1% increase) | 0.991 | (0.983, | 1.000) | 0.038 | 0.970 | (0.954, | 0.986) | <.001 | |
In females, OR and 95% CI for smoking index could not be obtained by the analyses using the computer software.
BMI, body mass index; BP, blood pressure; HbA1c, hemoglobin A1c; sCr, serum creatinine; FVC %predicted, percent predicted forced vital capacity; FEV1 %predicted, percent predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 s; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval
Figure 2Serum uric acid levels according to degree of lung restriction and airflow limitation. Subjects were categorized into three groups according to degree of lung restriction: FVC %predicted ≥80, 70≤ FVC %predicted <80, and FVC %predicted <70. Subjects were categorized as having airflow limitation if FEV1/FVC was <0.7, according to the Global Initiative for Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) criteria. Airflow limitation was classified as mild if FEV1 %predicted was ≥80, moderate if 50≤ FEV1 %predicted was <80 and severe if FEV1 %predicted was <50. To avoid using data for subjects with airflow limitation and lung restriction from the referent group, those subjects were excluded from the analyses shown in (A) and (B). Subjects with lung restriction [FVC %predicted <70, and 70≤ FVC %predicted <80] had higher serum uric acid levels than subjects without lung restriction [FVC %predicted ≥80] (A). Subjects with moderate or severe airflow limitation had higher serum uric acid levels than subjects without airflow limitation or those with mild airflow limitation (B). Statistical comparisons were performed by ANOVA followed by the Student-Newman-Keuls test. *P < 0.05 compared with FVC %predicted ≥ 80, ***P < 0.001 compared with no airflow limitation, #P < 0.05 compared with mild airflow limitation, ##P < 0.01 compared with mild airflow limitation.