Literature DB >> 21849719

The effect of skin thermistor fixation method on weighted mean skin temperature.

Christopher James Tyler1.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of three different skin thermistor attachment methods on weighted mean skin temperature (WMT(sk)) at three different ambient temperatures (approximately 24 °C (TEMP); approximately 30 °C (WARM); approximately 35 °C (HOT)) compared to uncovered thermistors. Eleven, non-acclimated, volunteers completed three 5 min bouts of submaximal cycling (approximately 70 W mechanical work)-one at each environmental condition in sequential order (TEMP, WARM, HOT). One thermistor was fixed to the sternal notch whilst four skin thermistors were spaced at 3 cm intervals on each of the sites on the limbs as per the formula of Ramanathan (1964 J. Appl. Physiol. 19 531-3). Each thermistor was either held against the skin uncovered (UC) or attached with surgical acrylic film dressing (T); surgical acrylic film dressing and hypoallergenic surgical tape (TT) or surgical acrylic film dressing, hypoallergenic surgical tape and surgical bandage (TTC). The WMT(sk) calculated was significantly lower in UC compared to T, TT and TTC (p < 0.001, d = 0.46), in T compared to TT and TTC (p < 0.001, d = 0.33) and in TT compared to TTC (p < 0.001; d = 0.25). The mean differences (across the three temperatures) were + 0.27 ± 0.34 °C, + 0.52 ± 0.35 °C and + 0.82 ± 0.34 °C for T, TT and TTC, respectively. The results demonstrate that the method of skin thermistor attachment can result in the significant over-estimation of weighted mean skin temperature.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21849719     DOI: 10.1088/0967-3334/32/10/003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiol Meas        ISSN: 0967-3334            Impact factor:   2.833


  6 in total

1.  Effect of ambient temperature and attachment method on surface temperature measurements.

Authors:  Agnes Psikuta; Reto Niedermann; René M Rossi
Journal:  Int J Biometeorol       Date:  2013-05-19       Impact factor: 3.787

2.  Validation of the thermophysiological model by Fiala for prediction of local skin temperatures.

Authors:  Natividad Martínez; Agnes Psikuta; Kalev Kuklane; José Ignacio Priego Quesada; Rosa María Cibrián Ortiz de Anda; Pedro Pérez Soriano; Rosario Salvador Palmer; José Miguel Corberán; René Michel Rossi; Simon Annaheim
Journal:  Int J Biometeorol       Date:  2016-05-25       Impact factor: 3.787

3.  A comparison between conductive and infrared devices for measuring mean skin temperature at rest, during exercise in the heat, and recovery.

Authors:  Aaron J E Bach; Ian B Stewart; Alice E Disher; Joseph T Costello
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-02-06       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  Skin Temperature Measurement Using Contact Thermometry: A Systematic Review of Setup Variables and Their Effects on Measured Values.

Authors:  Braid A MacRae; Simon Annaheim; Christina M Spengler; René M Rossi
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2018-01-30       Impact factor: 4.566

5.  Expected accuracy of proximal and distal temperature estimated by wireless sensors, in relation to their number and position on the skin.

Authors:  Enrico Longato; Maria Garrido; Desy Saccardo; Camila Montesinos Guevara; Ali R Mani; Massimo Bolognesi; Piero Amodio; Andrea Facchinetti; Giovanni Sparacino; Sara Montagnese
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-06-30       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  A Thermal Skin Model for Comparing Contact Skin Temperature Sensors and Assessing Measurement Errors.

Authors:  Braid A MacRae; Christina M Spengler; Agnes Psikuta; René M Rossi; Simon Annaheim
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-07-19       Impact factor: 3.576

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.