Literature DB >> 21849426

Normative database for corneal backscatter analysis by in vivo confocal microscopy.

Toine Hillenaar1, Roger H H Cals, Paul H C Eilers, René J Wubbels, Hugo van Cleynenbreugel, Lies Remeijer.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To ascertain the sex and age relatedness, diurnal variation, and repeatability of backscatter measurement in the normal human cornea.
METHODS: Seven corneal backscatter variants were measured by in vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM) in both normal eyes (n = 314) of 157 healthy subjects. These subjects were assigned to one or more of three groups. The sex and age relatedness of corneal backscatter were assessed in group 1 (n = 300), which comprised 75 men and 75 women evenly distributed over five age categories. To assess diurnal variation, eyes in group 2 (n = 40) were measured four times a day, at 3-hour intervals. The eyes in group 3 (n = 50) were examined four times a year to determine intersession repeatability. Intrasession repeatability was determined by performing all IVCM examinations in duplicate. Linear mixed models were used to assess the effects of sex, age, and time of measurement on corneal backscatter.
RESULTS: Mean corneal backscatter was 3.5% higher in men (P = 0.003). From the age of 50 years, backscatter increased significantly in the anterior stroma (P = 0.0003). A small but statistically significant diurnal variation was found in all seven backscatter variants (P < 0.01). The test-retest coefficient of variation of mean corneal backscatter was 5.3%, comprising intra- and intersession repeatability.
CONCLUSIONS: Sex and time of measurement significantly affect corneal backscatter measured by IVCM, whereas age affects only backscatter in the anterior stroma. All three factors should be taken into account when conducting scientific research. For ophthalmic practice, the authors suggest ignoring these factors and propose a generalized normal range and minimum detectable change for each backscatter variant.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21849426     DOI: 10.1167/iovs.11-7747

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci        ISSN: 0146-0404            Impact factor:   4.799


  14 in total

1.  Corneal abnormalities early in the course of Fuchs' endothelial dystrophy.

Authors:  Sejal R Amin; Keith H Baratz; Jay W McLaren; Sanjay V Patel
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2014-08-22       Impact factor: 12.079

2.  Assessment of corneal backward light scattering in the healthy cornea and factors affecting corneal transparency.

Authors:  Ali Bulent Cankaya; Kemal Tekin; Hasan Kiziltoprak; Sevilay Karahan; Pelin Yilmazbas
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-03-16       Impact factor: 2.447

Review 3.  [Corneal densitometry : Value for keratoconus diagnostics].

Authors:  M Alnawaiseh; N Eter
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 1.059

4.  Corneal High-Order Aberrations and Backscatter in Fuchs' Endothelial Corneal Dystrophy.

Authors:  Katrin Wacker; Jay W McLaren; Sejal R Amin; Keith H Baratz; Sanjay V Patel
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2015-06-06       Impact factor: 12.079

5.  Corneal densitometry and its correlation with age, pachymetry, corneal curvature, and refraction.

Authors:  Nuria Garzón; Francisco Poyales; Igor Illarramendi; Javier Mendicute; Óscar Jáñez; Pedro Caro; Alfredo López; Francisco Argüeso
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-11-11       Impact factor: 2.031

6.  Corneal densitometry after allogeneic small-incision intrastromal lenticule implantation for hyperopia correction.

Authors:  Jie Hou; Yan Wang; Jing Zhang; Yulin Lei; Zhixing Ma; Ying Zhang; Xiuyun Zheng
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-06-29       Impact factor: 2.086

7.  New algorithm for corneal densitometry assessment based on anterior segment optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Xiao Yu Wang; Jorge Peraza-Nieves; Tian Qiao Zhang; Anil Rahul Rachwani; Irene Blanco-Domínguez; Carlos Rocha de Lossada; Afredo Manuel Adán-Civiera
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2021-08-02       Impact factor: 4.456

8.  Corneal backscatter analysis by in vivo confocal microscopy: fellow eye comparison of small incision lenticule extraction and femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK.

Authors:  Alper Agca; Engin Bilge Ozgurhan; Yusuf Yildirim; Kadir Ilker Cankaya; Nimet Burcu Guleryuz; Zeynep Alkin; Abdullah Ozkaya; Ahmet Demirok; Omer Faruk Yilmaz
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-03-05       Impact factor: 1.909

9.  Results of a phase I/II clinical trial: standardized, non-xenogenic, cultivated limbal stem cell transplantation.

Authors:  Nadia Zakaria; Tine Possemiers; Sorcha Ní Dhubhghaill; Inge Leysen; Jos Rozema; Carina Koppen; Jean-Pierre Timmermans; Zwi Berneman; Marie-Jose Tassignon
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2014-03-03       Impact factor: 5.531

10.  Measuring Corneal Haze by Using Scheimpflug Photography and Confocal Microscopy.

Authors:  Jay W McLaren; Katrin Wacker; Katrina M Kane; Sanjay V Patel
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2016-01-01       Impact factor: 4.799

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.