S J Stocks1, R McNamee, S Turner, M Carder, R M Agius. 1. Centre for Occupational and Environmental Health, Health Sciences Group, School of Community-Based Medicine, Faculty of Medical and Human Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK. jill.stocks@manchester.ac.uk
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Hexavalent chromate (chromate) in cement is a well-recognised cause of allergic contact dermatitis (ACD). Consequently in January 2005, following European Union legislation (EU Directive 2003/53/EC), the use or supply of cement containing >2 ppm of chromate was prohibited in the UK (COSHH 2004). This analysis of work-related ill-health surveillance aims to evaluate the effectiveness of this legislation. METHOD: Changes in the incidence of work-related ACD cases returned to The Health and Occupation Reporting network by dermatologists were analysed taking in to account attribution to chromate and occupation. RESULTS: There was a significant decline in the incidence of both ACD attributed to chromate (incidence rate ratio 0.48, 95% CI 0.36 to 0.64) and ACD not-attributed chromate (0.76, 95% CI 0.69 to 0.85) between the time period preceding the EU legislation (2002-2004) and the postlegislation period (2005-2009). However, the decline in ACD attributed to chromate was significantly greater (p=0.006). This decline was further increased in workers potentially exposed to cement (incidence rate ratio 0.37, p=0.001). The majority of the decline in incidence occurred during 2005. CONCLUSION: The timing of this significant decline in the UK incidence of chromate attributed ACD, and the greater decline in workers potentially exposed to cement strongly suggests that the EU Directive2003/53/EC was successful in reducing exposure to chromate in cement in the UK.
OBJECTIVE: Hexavalent chromate (chromate) in cement is a well-recognised cause of allergic contact dermatitis (ACD). Consequently in January 2005, following European Union legislation (EU Directive 2003/53/EC), the use or supply of cement containing >2 ppm of chromate was prohibited in the UK (COSHH 2004). This analysis of work-related ill-health surveillance aims to evaluate the effectiveness of this legislation. METHOD: Changes in the incidence of work-related ACD cases returned to The Health and Occupation Reporting network by dermatologists were analysed taking in to account attribution to chromate and occupation. RESULTS: There was a significant decline in the incidence of both ACD attributed to chromate (incidence rate ratio 0.48, 95% CI 0.36 to 0.64) and ACD not-attributed chromate (0.76, 95% CI 0.69 to 0.85) between the time period preceding the EU legislation (2002-2004) and the postlegislation period (2005-2009). However, the decline in ACD attributed to chromate was significantly greater (p=0.006). This decline was further increased in workers potentially exposed to cement (incidence rate ratio 0.37, p=0.001). The majority of the decline in incidence occurred during 2005. CONCLUSION: The timing of this significant decline in the UK incidence of chromate attributed ACD, and the greater decline in workers potentially exposed to cement strongly suggests that the EU Directive2003/53/EC was successful in reducing exposure to chromate in cement in the UK.
Authors: Melanie Carder; Louise Hussey; Annemarie Money; Matthew Gittins; Roseanne McNamee; Susan Jill Stocks; Dil Sen; Raymond M Agius Journal: Saf Health Work Date: 2017-01-13
Authors: Eleni Zorba; Antony Karpouzis; Alexandros Zorbas; Theodore Bazas; Sam Zorbas; Elias Alexopoulos; Ilias Zorbas; Konstantinos Kouskoukis; Theodoros Konstandinidis Journal: Saf Health Work Date: 2013-07-20
Authors: Begoña Martínez-Jarreta; Nicole Majery; Petar Bulat; Soile Jungewelter; Elena-Ana Păuncu; Dieter Weigel; Marija Bubas; Alenka Škerjanc; Ivars Vanadzins; Maija Eglite; Marcos Larrosa; Susan Jill Stocks; Lode Godderis Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-03-28 Impact factor: 3.390