Literature DB >> 21849313

A micro-geography of fear: learning to eavesdrop on alarm calls of neighbouring heterospecifics.

Robert D Magrath1, Thomas H Bennett.   

Abstract

Many vertebrates eavesdrop on alarm calls of other species, which is a remarkable ability, given geographical variation in community composition and call diversity within and among species. We used micro-geographical variation in community composition to test whether individuals recognize heterospecific alarm calls by: (i) responding to acoustic features shared among alarm calls; (ii) having innate responses to particular heterospecific calls; or (iii) learning specific alarm calls. We found that superb fairy-wrens (Malurus cyaneus) fled to cover to playback of noisy miner (Manorina melanocephala) aerial predator alarm calls only in locations where miners were present, suggesting that learning rather than acoustic structure determines response. Sites with and without miners were well within the dispersal distance of fairy-wrens, and philopatric males and dispersing females showed the same pattern, so that local genetic adaptation is extremely unlikely. Furthermore, where miners were present, fairy-wrens responded appropriately to different miner calls, implying eavesdropping on their signalling system rather than fleeing from miners themselves. Learned eavesdropping on alarm calls enables individuals to harvest ecologically relevant information from heterospecifics on an astonishingly fine spatial scale. Such phenotypic plasticity is valuable in a changing world, where individuals can be exposed to new species.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21849313      PMCID: PMC3259928          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2011.1362

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  29 in total

1.  Dispersal, philopatry, and infidelity: dissecting local genetic structure in superb fairy-wrens (Malurus cyaneus).

Authors:  M C Double; R Peakall; N R Beck; A Cockburn
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.694

2.  Flexibility in assessment of prey cues: frog-eating bats and frog calls.

Authors:  Rachel A Page; Michael J Ryan
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2005-04-22       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Recognition of other species' aerial alarm calls: speaking the same language or learning another?

Authors:  Robert D Magrath; Benjamin J Pitcher; Janet L Gardner
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-02-22       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Vigilance against predators induced by eavesdropping on heterospecific alarm calls in a non-vocal lizard Oplurus cuvieri cuvieri (Reptilia: Iguania).

Authors:  Ryo Ito; Akira Mori
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-12-23       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Yellow-bellied marmot and golden-mantled ground squirrel responses to heterospecific alarm calls

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 2.844

6.  A host-race of the cuckoo Cuculus canorus with nestlings attuned to the parental alarm calls of the host species.

Authors:  N B Davies; J R Madden; S H M Butchart; J Rutila
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-03-22       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Evolution driven by differential dispersal within a wild bird population.

Authors:  Dany Garant; Loeske E B Kruuk; Teddy A Wilkin; Robin H McCleery; Ben C Sheldon
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-01-06       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Strategic variation in mobbing as a front line of defense against brood parasitism.

Authors:  Justin A Welbergen; Nicholas B Davies
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2009-01-29       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 9.  Production, usage, and comprehension in animal vocalizations.

Authors:  Robert M Seyfarth; Dorothy L Cheney
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2009-11-26       Impact factor: 2.381

10.  Can we measure the benefits of help in cooperatively breeding birds: the case of superb fairy-wrens Malurus cyaneus?

Authors:  Andrew Cockburn; Rachel A Sims; Helen L Osmond; David J Green; Michael C Double; Raoul A Mulder
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2008-02-25       Impact factor: 5.091

View more
  18 in total

1.  Bright birds are cautious: seasonally conspicuous plumage prompts risk avoidance by male superb fairy-wrens.

Authors:  Alexandra McQueen; Annalise C Naimo; Niki Teunissen; Robert D Magrath; Kaspar Delhey; Anne Peters
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Learning and signal copying facilitate communication among bird species.

Authors:  David Wheatcroft; Trevor D Price
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-02-27       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Heterospecific eavesdropping in ant-following birds of the Neotropics is a learned behaviour.

Authors:  Henry S Pollock; Ari E Martínez; J Patrick Kelley; Janeene M Touchton; Corey E Tarwater
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-10-25       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Interspecific signalling between mutualists: food-thieving drongos use a cooperative sentinel call to manipulate foraging partners.

Authors:  Bruce D Baigrie; Alex M Thompson; Tom P Flower
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-09-22       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Receivers matter: the meaning of alarm calls and competition for nest sites in a bird community.

Authors:  Deseada Parejo; Jesús M Avilés; Mónica Expósito-Granados
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2018-04-11       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Alarming features: birds use specific acoustic properties to identify heterospecific alarm calls.

Authors:  Pamela M Fallow; Benjamin J Pitcher; Robert D Magrath
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-01-08       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 7.  Linking social complexity and vocal complexity: a parid perspective.

Authors:  Indrikis Krams; Tatjana Krama; Todd M Freeberg; Cecilia Kullberg; Jeffrey R Lucas
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-07-05       Impact factor: 6.237

8.  The African cichlid fish Astatotilapia burtoni uses acoustic communication for reproduction: sound production, hearing, and behavioral significance.

Authors:  Karen P Maruska; Uyhun S Ung; Russell D Fernald
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-18       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Host response to cuckoo song is predicted by the future risk of brood parasitism.

Authors:  Sonia Kleindorfer; Christine Evans; Diane Colombelli-Négrel; Jeremy Robertson; Matteo Griggio; Herbert Hoi
Journal:  Front Zool       Date:  2013-05-22       Impact factor: 3.172

10.  Human perception of fear in dogs varies according to experience with dogs.

Authors:  Michele Wan; Niall Bolger; Frances A Champagne
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-12-19       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.