Literature DB >> 21848578

Temporal changes in hospital costs for left ventricular assist device implantation.

Mark S Slaughter1, Robin Bostic, Kuo Tong, Mark Russo, Joseph G Rogers.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A recent prospective, randomized controlled trial demonstrated that a continuous-flow (CF) left ventricular assist device (LVAD) resulted in improved survival at 12 and 24 months compared to a pulsatile-flow (PF) device. The current study examines the hospitalization costs associated with treatment of New York Heart Failure Class IV patients when implanted with a CF LVAD and compares them to previously reported costs of a PF LVAD in the same population.
METHODS: Hospital billing data were analyzed for CF LVAD patients in the HeartMate II Destination Therapy trial to determine costs associated with the implantation admission. Hospital charges were converted to costs using hospital specific cost-to-charge ratios. Hospital costs were evaluated based on patient outcomes and compared to previously reported results from patients who received a pulsatile flow LVAD in Randomized Evaluation of Mechanical Assistance for the Treatment of Congestive Heart Failure. Multivariate models were created to determine the primary determinates of cost.
RESULTS: Hospital bills were available for 83 CF and 52 PF LVAD patients. Hospital length of stay and in-hospital mortality were lower in the CF cohort. Inflation-adjusted hospital costs were significantly lower for CF patients compared to PF patients (mean: $193,812 vs. $384,260, p < 0.001). Clinical factors that strongly influenced hospitalization costs included bleeding, respiratory failure, and infection.
CONCLUSIONS: There has been a 50% reduction in the hospitalization cost associated with LVAD implantation since 2001. Improvements in operative technique and postoperative management appear to play critical roles in the observed cost reduction.
© 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21848578     DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8191.2011.01292.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Card Surg        ISSN: 0886-0440            Impact factor:   1.620


  20 in total

1.  Mesenchymal precursor cells as adjunctive therapy in recipients of contemporary left ventricular assist devices.

Authors:  Deborah D Ascheim; Annetine C Gelijns; Daniel Goldstein; Lemuel A Moye; Nicholas Smedira; Sangjin Lee; Charles T Klodell; Anita Szady; Michael K Parides; Neal O Jeffries; Donna Skerrett; Doris A Taylor; J Eduardo Rame; Carmelo Milano; Joseph G Rogers; Janine Lynch; Todd Dewey; Eric Eichhorn; Benjamin Sun; David Feldman; Robert Simari; Patrick T O'Gara; Wendy C Taddei-Peters; Marissa A Miller; Yoshifumi Naka; Emilia Bagiella; Eric A Rose; Y Joseph Woo
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2014-03-28       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  The Effect of Total Cost Information on Consumer Treatment Decisions: An Experimental Survey.

Authors:  Regina Kwon; Larry A Allen; Laura D Scherer; Jocelyn S Thompson; Madiha F Abdel-Maksoud; Colleen K McIlvennan; Daniel D Matlock
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 2.583

3.  General and acute care surgical procedures in patients with left ventricular assist devices.

Authors:  George J Arnaoutakis; Gregory J Bittle; Jeremiah G Allen; Eric S Weiss; Jennifer Alejo; William A Baumgartner; Ashish S Shah; Christopher L Wolfgang; David T Efron; John V Conte
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Postoperative atrial fibrillation is associated with increased morbidity and resource utilization after left ventricular assist device placement.

Authors:  Robert B Hawkins; J Hunter Mehaffey; Abra Guo; Eric J Charles; Alan M Speir; Jeffrey B Rich; Mohammed A Quader; Gorav Ailawadi; Leora T Yarboro
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2018-04-18       Impact factor: 5.209

5.  Center Variation in Medicare Spending for Durable Left Ventricular Assist Device Implant Hospitalizations.

Authors:  Michael P Thompson; Francis D Pagani; Qixing Liang; Lynze R Franko; Min Zhang; Jeffrey S McCullough; Raymond J Strobel; Keith D Aaronson; Robert L Kormos; Donald S Likosky
Journal:  JAMA Cardiol       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 14.676

6.  Mechanical circulatory support devices as destination therapy-current evidence.

Authors:  Thomas Puehler; Stephan Ensminger; Michael Schoenbrodt; Jochen Börgermann; Erik Rehn; Kavous Hakim-Meibodi; Michiel Morshuis; Jan Gummert
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2014-09

Review 7.  Hospital to Home with Mechanical Circulatory Support.

Authors:  Lavanya Bellumkonda; Daniel Jacoby
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2013-09

8.  Predictors of hospital length of stay after implantation of a left ventricular assist device: an analysis of the INTERMACS registry.

Authors:  William G Cotts; Edwin C McGee; Susan L Myers; David C Naftel; James B Young; James K Kirklin; Kathleen L Grady
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2014-03-01       Impact factor: 10.247

9.  The impact of insurance and socioeconomic status on outcomes for patients with left ventricular assist devices.

Authors:  Sakima A Smith; Ayesha K Hasan; Philip F Binkley; Randi E Foraker
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2014-05-09       Impact factor: 2.192

10.  Orthotopic heart transplant versus left ventricular assist device: a national comparison of cost and survival.

Authors:  Daniel P Mulloy; Castigliano M Bhamidipati; Matthew L Stone; Gorav Ailawadi; Irving L Kron; John A Kern
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2012-12-13       Impact factor: 5.209

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.