Literature DB >> 2184833

Genetic approaches to studying drug abuse: correlates of drug self-administration.

F R George1.   

Abstract

Some important issues in substance abuse are the relationship between propensity to self-administer a drug and neurosensitivity to that drug; similarities and differences between various models of drug-seeking behavior; and the commonality of drug-seeking behavior across drugs and genotypes. Findings related to these issues are now emerging from the areas of pharmacogenetics and operant drug self-administration. Ethanol has been readily established as a positive reinforcer in AA (Alcohol Accepting), P (Preferring) and LEWIS rats, as well as C57BL/6J and LS/Ibg mice. In low ethanol preferring F344 and NP (Non-Preferring) rats, ethanol maintains significant but low levels of responding. Ethanol does not maintain lever-pressing behavior in BALB/cJ or SS/Ibg mice, and is avoided in DBA/2J mice. This pattern of reinforcement from ethanol is only moderately correlated with ethanol preference, and is not correlated with neurosensitivity to ethanol, at least as measured by duration of loss of the righting reflex (LORR). However, these genotypic patterns of reinforcement from ethanol do appear to correlate highly with patterns of reinforcement from cocaine and opiates. From these findings it is concluded that: 1) there exist important genetic determinants of drug reinforced behavior; 2) ethanol preference is not a highly accurate measure of reinforcement from ethanol; 3) sensitivity to ethanol as measured by LORR and self-administration of this drug are not highly genetically correlated; and 4) drug-seeking behaviors maintained by ethanol, cocaine and opiates may have at least some common biological determinants.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2184833     DOI: 10.1016/0741-8329(90)90006-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Alcohol        ISSN: 0741-8329            Impact factor:   2.405


  6 in total

1.  Differences in response to the aversive properties and activity effects of low dose ethanol in LAS and HAS selectively bred rats.

Authors:  M D Schechter; E C Krimmer
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 4.530

2.  Oral etonitazene and cocaine consumption by AA, ANA and Wistar rats.

Authors:  P Hyyatiä; J D Sinclair
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.530

3.  Predicting extinction and reinstatement of alcohol and sucrose self-administration in outbred rats.

Authors:  Therese A Kosten; Richard A Meisch
Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2013-02-18       Impact factor: 3.157

4.  Genetic differences in the rewarding and activating effects of morphine and ethanol.

Authors:  C L Cunningham; D R Niehus; D H Malott; L K Prather
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 4.530

5.  Inhibition of nitric oxide formation reduces voluntary ethanol consumption in the rat.

Authors:  G Calapai; G Mazzaglia; L Sautebin; G Costantino; M C Marciano; S Cuzzocrea; M Di Rosa; A P Caputi
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 6.  Alcoholism: the role of different motivational systems.

Authors:  R O Pihl; J B Peterson
Journal:  J Psychiatry Neurosci       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 6.186

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.