| Literature DB >> 21848280 |
Bahareh Asadishad1, Subhasis Ghoshal, Nathalie Tufenkji.
Abstract
The risk of groundwater contamination by microbial pathogens is linked to their survival in the subsurface. Although there is a large body of literature on the inactivation behavior of suspended (planktonic) microorganisms, little is known about the inactivation of bacteria when attached to sand grain surfaces in groundwater aquifers. The main goal of this study was to develop a fluorescence-based experimental technique for evaluating the extent of inactivation over time of bacteria adhered onto a surface in an aqueous environment. Key features of the developed technique are as follows: (i) attached cells do not need to be removed from the surface of interest for quantification, (ii) bacterial inactivation can be examined in real-time for prolonged time periods, and (iii) the system remains undisturbed (i.e., the aqueous environment is unchanged) during the assay. A negatively or positively charged substrate (i.e., bare or coated glass slide) was mounted in a parallel-plate flow cell, bacteria were allowed to attach onto the substrate, and the loss of bacterial membrane integrity and respiratory activity were investigated as a function of time by fluorescence microscopy using Live/Dead BacLight and BacLight RedoxSensor CTC (5-cyano-2,3-ditolyl tetrazolium chloride) viability assays. These two different measures of bacterial inactivation result in comparable trends in bacterial inactivation, confirming the validity of the experimental technique. The results of this work show that the developed technique is sensitive enough to distinguish between the inactivation kinetics of different representative bacteria attached to either a negatively charged (bare glass) surface or a positively charged (coated glass) surface. Hence, the technique can be used to characterize bacterial inactivation kinetics when attached to environmentally relevant surfaces over a broad range of groundwater chemistries.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21848280 DOI: 10.1021/es201496q
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Environ Sci Technol ISSN: 0013-936X Impact factor: 9.028